Equivalences between SELFIE indicators and DigCompEdu framework based on Delphi technique
PDF (Español/English) (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Métricas alternativas

Keywords

digital competence
expert judgement
SELFIE
DigCompEdu
teacher's professional development competencia digital
juicio de expertos
SELFIE
DigCompEdu
desarrollo profesional docente

How to Cite

Munar Garau, J., Oceja, J., & Salinas Ibáñez, J. (2024). Equivalences between SELFIE indicators and DigCompEdu framework based on Delphi technique. Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal, (69), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.101775

Abstract

SELFIE is one of the most popular tools for assesing the digital competence of schools based on information provided by principals, students and teachers. However, there is no information on how instrument and their reports provide specific information on the digital competence of teachers according to the areas and indicators established in DigCompEdu. Through a modified two-round Delphi with 19 experts, this works tries to find out which indicators of SELFIE (and to what extent) correspond to the DigCompEdu items and what relationship exists between the eight areas established in SELFIE and the six areas of the DigCompEdu framework. The results reveal numerous correspondences between items, especially in areas such as teaching and assessment. Furthermore, it shows that the areas of both models are interrelated, suggesting that the data generated through SELFIE could provide information on the specific digital competences of teachers in a particular school. The text suggests to keep identifying and designing instruments that can measure the digital competence of schools and teachers in a valid and rigorous manner.

https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.101775
PDF (Español/English) (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Álvarez, J., & Gisbert, M. (2015). Information literacy grade of Secondary School teachers in Spain. Beliefs and self-perceptions. [Grado de alfabetización informacional del profesorado de Secundaria en España: Creencias y autopercepciones]. Comunicar, 45, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-20

Bocconi, S., Panesi, S., & Kampylis, P. (2020). Fostering the digital competence of schools: piloting SELFIE in the Italian education context. IEEE - Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(4). http://doi.org10.1109/RITA.2020.3033228

Cabero, J., & Barroso, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de tic: el coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón. Revista De Pedagogía, 65(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202

Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Barroso-Osuna, J. M., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Digital teaching compentence according to the DigComEdu framework. Comparative study in differente latin american universities. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1452

Cabero, J., & Infante, A. (2014). Empleo del método Delphi y su empleo en la investigación en comunicación y educación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (48), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2014.48.18

Cabero J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Marco Europeo de Competencia Digital Docente «DigCompEdu» y cuestionario «DigCompEdu Check-In». EDMETIC. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 9(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v9i1.12462

Castaño-Muñoz, J., Costa, P., Hippe, R., & Kampylis, P. (2018). “Within-school differences in the views on the use of digital technologies in Europe: evidence from the SELFIE tool,” in EDULEARN18 Proceedings, eds L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, and I. Candel Torres, (Valencia: IATED Academy), 10417–10426. http://doi.org.10.21125/edulearn.2018.2528

Comisión Europea. (2007). Competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Un marco de referencia Europeo. http://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/ministerio/educacion/mecu/movilidad-europa/competenciasclave.pdf?documentId=0901e72b80685fb1

Comisión Europea. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Digital Education Action Plan (COM(2018) 22 final). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0624

Comisión Europea. (2018). Recomendación del Consejo de 22 de mayo de 2018 relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=SV

Comisión Europea. (2004). Recomendación del Parlamento europeo y del Consejo sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/com/com_com(2005)0548_/com_com(2005)0548_es.pdf

Costa, P., Castaño-Muñoz, J., & Kampylis, P. (2021). Capturing schools' digital capacity: Psychometric analyses of the SELFIE self-reflection tool. Computers & Education, 162, 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104080

Creemers, B. P. M., Kyriakides, L., & Antoniou, P. (2013). A dynamic approach to school improvement: Main features and impact. School Leadership and Management, 33(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.773883

Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2021). Importancia de la retroalimentación formativa en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 13(4), 389-397.

Fernández, J. T., & Pérez, K. V. P. (2018). Nuevos escenarios y competencias digitales docentes: hacia la profesionalización docente con TIC. Profesorado, revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 22(1), 25-5. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i1.9917

Franc, J. (2021, Febrero 14). Delphi Studies. Medstatsstudies. Logistic Solutions in Medical Research. http://www.medstatstudio.com

García-Ruiz, R., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. (2023). Evaluación de la Competencia Digital Docente: instrumentos, resultados y propuestas. Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Educación XXI, 26(1), 273-301. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33520

Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Trujillo-Torres, J.M., & Rodríguez García, A.M.(2021). Competencia digital docente en educación de adultos: un estudio en un contexto español [Digital competence in adult education: a study in a Spanish context]. Pixel-Bit.Revista de Medios y Educación,62, 209-234. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.89510

Gisbert, M., González, J. & Esteve, F. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. RIITE. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 0, 74-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/riite/2016/257631

Hippe, R. and Jakubowski, Μ. (2022). Is student digital competence shaped by schools or individual factors? Insights from SELFIE using multilevel models. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Cedefop working paper, No 14. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/00684

Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H., & Gray, J. M. (2010). Institutional contexts and international performances in schooling: Comparing patterns and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 153–173.

Jeladze, E., & Pata, K. (2018). The model of self-organization in digitally enhanced schools. IxD A 39, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-039-003

Jiménez Hernández, D., Muñoz Sánchez, P., & Sánchez Giménez, F. S. (2021). La Competencia Digital Docente, una revisión sistemática de los modelos más utilizados. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (10), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.472351

Kampylis, P., Devine, J., Punie, Y., & Newman, T. (2016). “Supporting schools to go digital: from conceptual model towards the design of a self-assessment tool for digital-age learning,” in ICERI Proceedings, eds L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, and I. Candel Torres, (València: IATED Digital Library), 816–825. http://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.1185

Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning. A European framework for digitally-competent educational organizations. Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC98209

Kampylis, P., Hodsno, D., Petkova, S., Hippe, R., Cachia, R., Sala, A., Wikert, L., Castano Munoz, y J., Punie, Y. (2019) SELFIE Forum. Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. (No. JRC 117482). Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC117482

Keeney, S., McKenna, H. A., & Hasson, F. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. John Wiley & Sons. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781444392029

Lázaro Cantabrana, J. L., & Gisbert, M. (2015). El desarrollo de la competencia digital docente a partir de una experiencia piloto de formación en alternancia en el Grado de Educación. Educar, 51 (2), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.725

Linstone, H. A. & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing. http://doi.irg/10.2307/3150755

Munar-Garau, J., Salinas Ibáñez, J. & Perez-Garcías, A. (2023). Indicadores para un mapa de la competencia digital docente a partir de SELFIE en las Islas Baleares en Ortega, D. (Ed), Educación y Sociedad: claves interdisciplinares, 1341-1351. Octaedro.

O’Leary, R. (2018). Digital Schools of distinction Feasibility Report. Digital Schools of Europe. http://www.digitalschoolseurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Feasibility-Report.pdf

Pablos Pons, J. de, Colás Bravo, M. P., & González Ramírez, T. (2010). Factores facilitadores de la innovación con TIC en los centros escolares: Un análisis comparativo entre diferentes políticas educativas autonómicas. Revista de educación, 352, 23-51. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/79366

Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J. (2023). Teacher Digital Competence in the education levels of Compulsory Education according to DigCompEdu: The impact of demographic predictors on its development. Interaction Design & Architecture(s) Journal, 57, 115-132. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-057-007

Panesi S, Bocconi S, & Ferlino L. (2020). Promoting Students' Well-Being and Inclusion in Schools Through Digital Technologies: Perceptions of Students, Teachers, and School Leaders in Italy Expressed Through SELFIE Piloting Activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01563

Powell, C. (2003), The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

Redecker, C. (2020). Marco europeo para la competencia digital de los educadores: DigCompEdu. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Rodríguez, D. M., de Jubera, M. M. S., Campión, R. S., & de Luis, E. C. (2016). Diseño de un instrumento para evaluación diagnóstica de la competencia digital docente: formación flipped classroom. DIM: Didáctica, Innovación y Multimedia, (33), 1-15. https://raco.cat/index.php/DIM/article/view/306791

Rodríguez-García, A. M., Raso, A. & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2019). Competencia digital, educación superior y formación del profesorado: un estudio de meta-análisis en la web of science. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 54, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i54.04

San Fabián Maroto, J. L. (2006). La coordinación docente: condiciones organizativas y compromiso profesional.https://redined.educacion.gob.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11162/94422/00820123015454.pdf?sequence=1

Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T. & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21. Informing Science Institute. https://www.jite.org/documents/Vol6/JITEv6p001-021Skulmoski212.pdf

Szûcs, A. (2019). Digital education: from hype and disappointment to change. Opus et Educatio. 5(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.3311/ope.280

Tanhua-Piiroinen, E., & Viteli, J. (2017). “Opeka and Ropeka, the self-assessing services for teachers and principals,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10474. Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education, eds E. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, and M. Pérez-Sanagustín, (Cham: Springer), 602–605. http://10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_72

Tejada Fernández, J., & Pozos Pérez, K. V. (2018). Nuevos escenarios y competencias digitales docentes: Hacia la profesionalización docente con TIC. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 22(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i1.9917

Tourón, J., Martín, D., Asencio, N., Pradas, A., & Íñigo, C. (2018). Validación de constructo de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital docente de los profesores (CDD) / Construct validation of a questionnaire to measure teachers’ digital competence (TDC). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(269), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.