Métricas alternativas
Metrics
Keywords
aprendizaje permanente
personas mayores
jóvenes adultos
competencias digitales y mediáticas digital inclusion
lifelong learning
older people
young adults
digital competence
media literacy
How to Cite
Abstract
Digital exclusion is a challenging phenomenon in many countries. The low level of digital and media competences among senior citizens raises many questions about the effectiveness of existing digital inclusion activities. This article fills a gap related to the development of digital competences from an intergenerational perspective. The paper answers the questions of 1) how to promote digital inclusion among seniors citizens, and 2) what role in the effective promotion of the development of digital competences could be played by young people. The paper used a standardised interview technique involving 22 young adults in Poland (20-35 years old) who reported on eleven ways to promote digital inclusion activities among seniors, and eight techniques that relate to the intergenerational development of digital and media competence.
References
Adamec, P. (2019). Vztah a motivace učitelů odborných předmětů k dalšímu vzdělávání. Pedagogika, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2018.862
Allman, D. (2013). The sociology of social Inclusion. SAGE Open, 3 (1). January-March, 1– 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012471957
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bernard, M. (2006). Keynote 1. Research, policy, practice, and theory: Interrelated dimensions of a developing field. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J194v04n01_03
Bonifacio, L. S., Portugal, L. C., & Eliseo, M. A. (2022). Accessibility Assessment in an Inclusive Course for Hearing Impaired Develop from SELI Platform. In 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J., MacLachlan, M. (2018). Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(10), 900–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12532
Boz, H., & Karatas, S. E. (2015). A review on internet use and quality of life of the elderly. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 10(3), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v1i1.64
Bradbrook, G.M., & Fisher, J. (2004). Digital Equality Reviewing Digital Inclusion Activity and Mapping the Way Forwards. London: Citizens Online.
Breytspraak, L. M., Arnold, L., & Hogan, K. (2008). Dimensions of an intergenerational relationship between medical students and mentors-on-aging. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770801955040
Bryant, A. (2017). The Grounded Theory Method. Grounded Theory and Grounded Theorizing, 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199922604.003.0004
Burgman, C., & Mulvaney, E. (2016). An intergenerational program connecting children and older adults with emotional, behavioral, cognitive or physical challenges: Gift of mutual understanding. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 14(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2016.1229536
Caprani, N., Doyle, J., O'Grady, M., Gurrin, C., O'Connor, N. E., Caulfield, B., & O'Hare, G. M. P. (2012). Technology use in everyday life: Implications for designing for older users. iHCI 2012: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Irish Human-Computer Interaction Conference: Poetics of Design, Narratives of Use, Ireland.
Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W., Gilbert, J. (2012). Internet Use and Perceived Impact on Quality of Life among Older Adults: A Phenomenological Investigation. International Journal of Health, Wellness & Society, 2(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18848/2156-8960/CGP/v02i03/41021
Dickinson, A., Eisma, R., Gregor, P. Syme, A., & Milne, S. (2005). Strategies for teaching older people to use the World Wide Web. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0082-6
Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening Divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
Van Dijk, J. A. (1999) The Network Society, Social Aspects of New Media. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
Eger, L., Tomczyk, Ł., Klement, M., Pisoňová, M. ., & Petrová, G. (2020). HOW DO FIRST YEAR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS USE ICT IN THEIR LEISURE TIME AND FOR LEARNING PURPOSES?. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE2002035 E
Elliot, A. J., Mooney, C. J., Douthit, K. Z., & Lynch, M. F. (2014). Predictors of older adults’ technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(5), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt10
Eurostat (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_SK_DSKL_I21__custom_2397093/bookmark/map?lang=en&bookmarkId=dc481686-c938-4e07-b03c-8e039f532857
Fleming, A., Mason, C., Paxton, G. (2018), Discourses of technology, ageing and participation, Palgrave Communications, 4 (54) https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0107-7
Findsen, B., & Formosa, M. (2011). Lifelong learning in later life: Ahandbook on older adult learning. Rotterdam, NL: Sens
Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Gadomska-Lila, K. (2020), Effectiveness of reverse mentoring in creating intergenerational relationships, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 33 No. 7, 1313-1328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2019-0326
Gamliel, T., & Gabay, N. (2014). Knowledge exchange, social interactions, and empowerment in an intergenerational technology program at school. Educational Gerontology, 40(8), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.863097
Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data. Sage.
Grasso, M., Pagola, L., & Zanotti, A. (2016). DIGITAL INCLUSION POLICIES IN ARGENTINA. USES AND APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE SCHOOL. Pixel-Bit. Media and Education Journal, (50), 95–107. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/61769
Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M., & Álvarez-García, F. J. (2020). A study on the actual use of digital competence in the practicum of education degree. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 667-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9390-z
Hanson, J., Trolian, T., Paulsen, M., & Pascarella, E. (2016). Evaluating the Influence of Peer Learning on Psychological Well-Being. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1136274
Helsper, E. J. (2012). A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion, Communication Theory, Vol. 22, Issue 4, 403–426, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
Hurme H. Westerback S., & Quadrello T. (2010). Traditional and new forms of contact between grandparents and grandchildren. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 8(3), 264- 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2010.498739
Lee, H. Y., Kanthawala, S., Choi, E. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2021), Rural and non-rural digital divide persists in older adults: Internet access, usage, and attitudes toward technology. Gerontechnology, 20(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.32-472.12
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Loipha, Smarn. (2014). Thai Elderly Behavior of Internet Use. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 147, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.125
Longoria, I. A. I., Bustamante-Bello, R., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Molina, A. (2022). Systematic Mapping of Digital Gap and Gender, Age, Ethnicity, or Disability. Sustainability, 14(3), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031297
Martins, V. F., Tomczyk, Ł., Amato, C., Eliseo, M. A., Oyelere, S. S., Akyar, Ö. Y., ... & Silveira, I. F. (2020). A Smart Ecosystem for Learning and Inclusion: An Architectural Overview. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 601-616). Springer, Cham.
Newman, S. (2006). Research and Intergenerational Studies, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 111-114, https://doi.org/10.1300/J194v04n02_10
Naumanen, M., & Tukiainen, M. (2007). Guiding the elderly into the use of computers and Internet – Lessons taught and learnt. In Kinshuk, D. G. Sampson, M. J. Spector, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 19-27). IADIS.
Newman, S. Newman, S., & Hatton‐Yeo, A. (2008). Intergenerational Learning and the Contributions of Older People. Ageing Horizons, Issue 8, 31-39.
Orłowska, M., & Błeszyńska, K. M. (2020). Edukacja a kompetencje cyfrowe seniora. Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja, 18(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2020.18.6.1
Pelka, B. (2015). Digitale Inklusion – digitale Exklusion: Teilhabe in einer digitalen Gesellschaft. https://www.bpb.de/lernen/digitale-bildung/werkstatt/217272/digitale-inklusiondigitale-exklusion-teilhabe-in-einer-digitalen-gesellschaft
Pelka, B. (2018). Digitale Teilhabe: Aufgaben der Verbände und Einrichtungen in der Wohlfahrtspflege. In H. Kreidenweis (Hrsg.). Digitaler Wandel in der Sozialwirtschaft. Grundlagen, Strategien, Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Pentzaropoulos G. C., Tsiougou D. (2014). E-Inclusion policies for contemporary knowledge economies and societies: An examination of the main issues. J. Soc. Res. Policy, 5 (1), 77–89.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Raport (2021). Wykluczenie społeczno-cyfrowe w Polsce. Stan zjawiska, trendy, rekomendacje. Fundacja Orange, Orange Polska.
Raport EU DESI, The Digital Economy and Society Index (2022). file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/DESI_2022__Poland__pl_UlopUwudTrPnJggMTs0l9cAo_88756.pdf
Rees, E. L., Quinn, P. J., Davies, B., & Fotheringham, V. (2016). How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical teacher, 38(8), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112888
Rice, R. E., Katz, J. E. (2003). Comparing Internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy, 27(8), 597-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-5961(03)00068-5
Riggins, F. J., & Dewan, S. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for information systems, 6(12), 13.
Sastre Reyes, J. (2019). La brecha digital en las escuelas rurales: un estudio de caso. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 5(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2019.v5i2.4995
Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
Soto Varela, R., Sanz Prieto, M., & Boumadan Hamed, M. (2020). La realidad de la brecha de conectividad en el ámbito educativo español: Análisis de la situación actual. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 6(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i1.7741
Špatenková, N., & Smékalová, L. (2015). Edukace seniorů. Geragogika a gerontodidaktika. Praha: Grada Publishning.
Szarota, Z. (2004). Gerontologia społeczna i oświatowa: zarys problematyki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej.
Thomas, M. (2009). Think community: An exploration of the linksbetween intergenerational practice and informal adultlearning. Leicester: NIAC
Tomczyk, L., Eliseo, M. A., Costas, V., Sanchez, G., Silveira, I. F., Barros, M.-J., Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., & Oyelere, S. S. (2019). Digital Divide in Latin America and Europe: Main Characteristics in Selected Countries. 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti.2019.8760821
Tomczyk, Ł. (2015). Edukacja osób starszych. Seniorzy w przestrzeni nowych mediów. Warszawa: Difin SA.
Tomczyk, Ł., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnęk-Gozdek, J., & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the functionality of a new e-learning platform vs. Previous experiences in e-learning and the self-assessment of own digital literacy. Sustainability, 12(23), 10219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310219
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Wide Web Consortium. W3C. (2018, June 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
Ziemba, E. (2019). The contribution of ICT adoption to sustainability: households’ perspective. Information Technology & People, 32(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-02-2018-0090
Vassilakopoulou P., Hustad E. (2021). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Front. 2021, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Pixel-Bit. Media and Education Journal