Framing Generative AI applications as tools for cognition in education.
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
PDF (English) (Español (España))

Métricas alternativas

Keywords

Artificial intelligence
cognition
learning processes
critical thinking
computer uses in education Inteligencia artificial
cognición
procesos de aprendizaje
pensamiento crítico
usos de los ordenadores en educación

How to Cite

Fuertes Alpiste, M. (2024). Framing Generative AI applications as tools for cognition in education. Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107697

Abstract

Generative AI applications enable different useful functions for learning based on the generation of content. This paper aims to offer a theoretical framework to understand them as tools for cognition (TFC), framed in the perspective of sociocultural theory and activity theory and distributed cognition. This perspective exemplifies how thought is not only packaged inside the individual's mind, but is distributed among subjects, objects, and artifacts, where tools mediate human activity and help in the executive functions of thought. The perspective of TFC embodies an educational socio-constructivist vision where learners build their knowledge with these tools, taking advantage of their affordances. It is the concept of learning "with" technology instead of the traditional vision of learning "from" technology, where technological applications are limited to providing information and evaluating the students' responses. Finally, we describe Generative AI applications as TFC following David Jonassen's pragmatic and pedagogical criteria, i.e. the capacity of knowledge representation of different subjects, the facilitation of critical and meaningful thinking (based on questioning and prompting) and how they enable complex thinking among students when used in learning tasks, only when executive functions are on the side of the learner.

https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107697
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
PDF (English) (Español (España))

References

Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindricks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., ..., Welling, M. (2020). A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect with Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Computer, 53(8), pp.18-28, http://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.2996587

Alier, M., García-Peñalvo, F.J., & Camba, J.D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5), pp. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011

Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910902846916

Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337

Cain, W. (2024). Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education. TechTrends, 68, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0

Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023, March 8). The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://shorturl.at/gvmOw

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://shorturl.at/wj9RI

Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions. psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge University Press.

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The Educational Affordances and Challenges of ChatGPT: State of the Field. TechTrends 68, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0

Dawson, S., Joksimovic, S., Mills, C., Gašević, D. & Siemens, G. (2023), Advancing theory in the age of artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1051-1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13343

DeFalco, J.A. & Sinatra, A.M. (2019). Adaptive Instructional Systems: The Evolution of Hybrid Cognitive Tools and Tutoring Systems. In R. Sottilare, J. Schwarz (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_5

Derry, S. J., & LaJoie, S. P. (1993). A middle camp for (un)intelligent instructional computing: An introduction. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 1-14). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp.2-4).

Dubé, A. K., & McEwen, R. N. (2017). Abilities and affordances: factors influencing successful child–tablet communication. Education Tech Research Dev. 65, 889–908 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9493-y

Eager, B., & Brunton, R. (2023). Prompting Higher Education Towards AI-Augmented Teaching and Learning Practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02

Engeström Y. & Sannino, A. (2021) From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23, http://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328

Garcia Brustenga, G., Fuertes-Alpiste, M. & Molas-Castells, N. (2018). Briefing paper: chatbots in education. eLearning Innovation Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https:/doi.org/10.7238/elc.chatbots.2018

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Company.

Gibson, E. J. (1989, July). Learning to perceive or perceiving to learn? Paper presented to the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Oxford.

Holstein, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Human–AI Hybrid Adaptivity in Education. In: I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, E. Millán. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12163. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_20

IFTF [Institute for the Future]. (2017). The next era of human / machine partnerships. Emerging technologies' impact on society and work 2030. Institute for the Future & Dell Technologies. https://shorturl.at/4DJUD

Iiyoshi, T., Hannafin, M. J., & Wang, F. (2005). Cognitive tools and student-centered learning: rethinking tools, functions and applications, Educational Media International, 42(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500161346

Järvelä, S., Nguyen, A., & Hadwin, A. (2023). Human and artificial intelligence collaboration for socially shared regulation in learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13325

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom. Mindtools for critical thinking. Prentice Hall.

Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C. Yueh, H. P., (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818172

Kanuka, H. (2008). Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in- practice. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 91–118). Athabasca University Press

Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C., (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: in search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35, 207-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9005-2

Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2006). Cognitive Tools and Mindtools for Collaborative Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.2190/R783-230M-0052-G843

Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P. (1994). On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1

Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A. & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225

Kozulin, A. (2000). Instrumentos psicológicos. La educación desde una perspectiva sociocultural. Paidós.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge University Press.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. [UNESCO] (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO

Mishra, P., Oster, N. & Henriksen, D. (2024). Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research: Bridging Short- and Long-Term Perspectives. TechTrends 68, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00938-1

Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.232359

Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

Open AI (2024, May 10). Open AI. About. https://openai.com/about/

Papert, S. (1982). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. Harvester Press.

Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2

Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge University Press.

Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88-110). Cambridge University Press.

Punie, Y., & Redecker, C (Eds.). (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompedu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/178382

Rheingold, H. (1985). Tools For Thought: The History and Future of Mind-Expanding Technology. The MIT Press.

Sabzalieva E. & Valentini, A. [UNESCO] (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: quick start guide. UNESCO.

Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals' cognition: a dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). Cambridge University Press.

Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (2005). Do technologies make us smarter? Intellectual amplification with, of and through technology. In R. Sternberg, R. and D. Preiss (eds.), Intelligence and Technology: The Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Abilities (pp. 71-86). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globertson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0200030

Schellaert, W., Martínez-Plumed, F., Vold, K., Burden, J., Casares, P., A. M., Sheng Loe, B., Reichart, R., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Korhonen, A., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2023). Your Prompt is My Command: On Assessing the Human-Centred Generality of Multimodal Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 77, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14157

Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Harvard University Press.

Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131

Simms, Rachel Cox DNP, RN, FNP-BC. (2024). Work With ChatGPT, Not Against: 3 Teaching Strategies That Harness the Power of Artificial Intelligence. Nurse Educator, 49(3), 158-161. http://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001634

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente. Paidós.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.