An Assessment of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Pre-service Teachers: A Rasch Model Measurement [Evaluación del conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) entre los profesores en formación: modelo de medición Rasch]
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
PDF (English)
HTML (Español) (Español (España))
HTML (English) (Español (España))

Métricas alternativas

Keywords

Maestros en formación
TPACK
Cuestionario de validación
Modelo rasch Pre-service teachers
TPACK
Validation questionnaire
Rasch model

How to Cite

Komarudin, K., & Suherman, S. (2024). An Assessment of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Pre-service Teachers: A Rasch Model Measurement [Evaluación del conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) entre los profesores en formación: modelo de medición Rasch]. Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal, 71, 59–82. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107599

Abstract

The increasing importance of integrating technology into educational environments has underscored the importance of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for effective teaching in the 21st century. However, many pre-service teachers face challenges in proficiently accessing and utilising new technologies in their teaching practices. The existing literature lacks a thorough examination of the empirical aspects of TPACK instruments and their applicability across various educational settings and levels, particularly in non-Western contexts. This research aimed to evaluate and compare TPACK among pre-service teachers in Indonesia. A diverse sample of 405 Indonesian pre-service teachers from different disciplines participated by completing an online TPACK questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis and the Rasch model were utilised to validate the questionnaire, demonstrating a well-fitting model consistent with its theoretical framework and a satisfactory fit for individuals and items. The evaluation of TPACK among pre-service elementary, preschool, and mathematics education teachers revealed superior performance by pre-service elementary school teachers. The robust psychometric properties make it suitable for exploring TPACK. This research lays the groundwork for further investigation of the empirical dimensions of TPACK in diverse educational contexts.

https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107599
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
PDF (English)
HTML (Español) (Español (España))
HTML (English) (Español (España))

References

Abedi, E. A., Prestridge, S., & Hodge, S. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in Ghana: A qualitative study of teachers’, headteachers’ and education officials’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5857–5877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12049-0

Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st century skills: Understanding the depth and width of the challenges to shape proactive teacher education programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097365

Ardiç, M. A., & Isleyen, T. (2017). High School Mathematics Teachers’ Levels of Achieving Technology Integration and In-Class Reflections: The Case of Mathematica. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(n12B), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051401

Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Albayrak Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565

Bolyard, J., Curtis, R., & Cairns, D. (2024). Learning to Struggle: Supporting Middle-grade Teachers’ Understanding of Productive Struggle in STEM Teaching and Learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00302-0

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Castaño, R., Poy, R., Tomşa, R., Flores, N., & Jenaro, C. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ performance from teachers’ perspective and vice versa: Behaviors, attitudes and other associated variables. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995487

Elas, N., Majid, F., & Narasuman, S. (2019). Development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for english teachers: The validity and reliability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(20), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i20.11456

Elmaadaway, M. A. N., & Abouelenein, Y. A. M. (2023). In-service teachers’ TPACK development through an adaptive e-learning environment (ALE). Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8273–8298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11477-8

Flores-Castro, E., Campos-Nava, M., Ramirez-Diaz, M. H., & Moreno-Ramos, J. (2024). The Construction of Knowledge for the Teaching of Sciences: A Reflection Seen From the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 3536–3555. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i1.251

Fütterer, T., Scherer, R., Scheiter, K., Stürmer, K., & Lachner, A. (2023). Will, skills, or conscientiousness: What predicts teachers’ intentions to participate in technology-related professional development? Computers & Education, 198, 104756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Gómez-García, M., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Digital competence in research work: Predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher:[Digital competence in research work: predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 69, 7–34. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.99992

Hall, J. A., Lei, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). The first principles of instruction: An examination of their impact on preservice teachers’ TPACK. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3115–3142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09866-2

Haşlaman, T., Atman Uslu, N., & Mumcu, F. (2024). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers’ digital competencies based on DigCompEdu: A case study. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Irmak, M., & Yilmaz Tüzün, Ö. (2019). Investigating pre-service science teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) regarding genetics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1466778

Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9394-5

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285

Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5

Komarudin, K., Sari, E., Rinaldi, A., Laksono, P. J., Anggara, B., Ali, M., Sholeh, M., & Wigati, I. (2024). STEM-based digital pocket book: The design and implementation of students’ mathematical communication ability. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3058(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0200927

König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., & Glutsch, N. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among preservice teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 800–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804

Lautenbach, F., & Heyder, A. (2019). Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: A systematic review. Educational Research, 61(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596035

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430730992

Li, M., Noori, A. Q., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

Luik, P., Taimalu, M., Naruskov, K., & Kalk, K. (2024). Does knowledge according to the TPACK framework have an impact on student teachers’ beliefs? A path analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12767-z

Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: A literature review. 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018), 498–503. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114

Martin, D. A., Carey, M. D., McMaster, N., & Clarkin, M. (2024). Assessing primary school preservice teachers’ confidence to apply their TPACK in specific categories of technologies using a self-audit survey. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00669-x

Maskur, R., Suherman, S., Andari, T., Sri Anggoro, B., Muhammad, R. R., & Untari, E. (2022). The Comparison of STEM approach and SSCS learning model for secondary school-based on K-13 curriculum: The impact on creative and critical thinking ability. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22(70), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.507701

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nordin, H., Davis, N., & Ariffin, T. F. T. (2013). A case study of secondary pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge mastery level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.300

Ong, Q. K. L., & Annamalai, N. (2024). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for twenty-first century learning skills: The game changer for teachers of industrial revolution 5.0. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1939–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11852-z

Park, H., & Scanlon, D. (2024). General educators’ perceptions of struggling learners in an inaugural project-based learning Capstone. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2024.2310673

Potter, K., Kniss, J., Riesenfeld, R., & Johnson, C. R. (2010). Visualizing Summary Statistics and Uncertainty. Computer Graphics Forum, 29(3), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01677.x

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital competence of educators. Edited by Yves Punie. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Reyes Jr, V. C., Reading, C., Doyle, H., & Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.009

Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323

Saubern, R., Urbach, D., Koehler, M., & Phillips, M. (2020). Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology. Computers & Education, 147, 103784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Smith, P. G., & Zelkowski, J. (2023). Validating a TPACK instrument for 7–12 mathematics in-service middle and high school teachers in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(5), 858–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2048145

Sofyan, S., Habibi, A., Sofwan, M., Yaakob, M. F. M., Alqahtani, T. M., Jamila, A., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). TPACK–UotI: The validation of an assessment instrument for elementary school teachers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01533-0

Stoilescu, D. (2015). A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: Secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 514–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115572285

Suherman, S. (2018). Ethnomathematics: Eksploration of Traditional Crafts Tapis Lampung as Ilustration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i2.3085

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2024). Relationship between ethnic identity, attitude, and mathematical creative thinking among secondary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101448

Supriadi, N., Jamaluddin Z, W., & Suherman, S. (2024). The role of learning anxiety and mathematical reasoning as predictor of promoting learning motivation: The mediating role of mathematical problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101497

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1

Wicaksono, A. G. C., & Korom, E. (2023). Attitudes towards science in higher education: Validation of questionnaire among science teacher candidates and engineering students in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20023

Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C., & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782618

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Pi­xel-Bit. Media and Education Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.