Evaluación del conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) entre los profesores en formación: modelo de medición Rasch [An Assessment of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Pre-service Teachers: A Rasch Model Measurement]
PDF (Español)
PDF (English) (English)
HTML (Español)
HTML (English)

Métricas alternativas

Palabras clave

Maestros en formación
TPACK
Cuestionario de validación
Modelo rasch Pre-service teachers
TPACK
Validation questionnaire
Rasch model

Cómo citar

Komarudin, K., & Suherman, S. (2024). Evaluación del conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) entre los profesores en formación: modelo de medición Rasch [An Assessment of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Pre-service Teachers: A Rasch Model Measurement]. Pixel-Bit. Revista De Medios Y Educación, 71, 59–82. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107599

Resumen

La creciente importancia de integrar la tecnología en los entornos educativos ha subrayado la importancia del Conocimiento Tecnológico del Contenido Pedagógico (TPACK) para una enseñanza eficaz en el siglo XXI. Sin embargo, muchos futuros docentes enfrentan desafíos para acceder y utilizar de manera competente las nuevas tecnologías en sus prácticas docentes. La literatura existente carece de un examen exhaustivo de los aspectos empíricos de los instrumentos TPACK y su aplicabilidad en diversos entornos y niveles educativos, particularmente en contextos no occidentales. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo evaluar y comparar TPACK entre profesores en formación en Indonesia. Una muestra diversa de 405 futuros docentes indonesios de diferentes disciplinas participó completando un cuestionario TPACK en línea. Se utilizaron análisis factorial confirmatorio y el modelo de Rasch para validar el cuestionario, demostrando un modelo bien ajustado consistente con su marco teórico y un ajuste satisfactorio para individuos y ítems. La evaluación de TPACK entre profesores de educación primaria, preescolar y matemáticas en formación reveló un desempeño superior por parte de los profesores de educación primaria en formación. Las sólidas propiedades psicométricas lo hacen adecuado para explorar TPACK. Esta investigación sienta las bases para una mayor investigación de las dimensiones empíricas de TPACK en diversos contextos educativos.

https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.107599
PDF (Español)
PDF (English) (English)
HTML (Español)
HTML (English)

Citas

Abedi, E. A., Prestridge, S., & Hodge, S. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in Ghana: A qualitative study of teachers’, headteachers’ and education officials’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5857–5877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12049-0

Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st century skills: Understanding the depth and width of the challenges to shape proactive teacher education programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097365

Ardiç, M. A., & Isleyen, T. (2017). High School Mathematics Teachers’ Levels of Achieving Technology Integration and In-Class Reflections: The Case of Mathematica. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(n12B), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051401

Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Albayrak Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565

Bolyard, J., Curtis, R., & Cairns, D. (2024). Learning to Struggle: Supporting Middle-grade Teachers’ Understanding of Productive Struggle in STEM Teaching and Learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00302-0

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Castaño, R., Poy, R., Tomşa, R., Flores, N., & Jenaro, C. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ performance from teachers’ perspective and vice versa: Behaviors, attitudes and other associated variables. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995487

Elas, N., Majid, F., & Narasuman, S. (2019). Development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for english teachers: The validity and reliability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(20), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i20.11456

Elmaadaway, M. A. N., & Abouelenein, Y. A. M. (2023). In-service teachers’ TPACK development through an adaptive e-learning environment (ALE). Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8273–8298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11477-8

Flores-Castro, E., Campos-Nava, M., Ramirez-Diaz, M. H., & Moreno-Ramos, J. (2024). The Construction of Knowledge for the Teaching of Sciences: A Reflection Seen From the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 3536–3555. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i1.251

Fütterer, T., Scherer, R., Scheiter, K., Stürmer, K., & Lachner, A. (2023). Will, skills, or conscientiousness: What predicts teachers’ intentions to participate in technology-related professional development? Computers & Education, 198, 104756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Gómez-García, M., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Digital competence in research work: Predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher:[Digital competence in research work: predictors that have an impact on it according to the type of university and gender of the Higher Education teacher]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 69, 7–34. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.99992

Hall, J. A., Lei, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). The first principles of instruction: An examination of their impact on preservice teachers’ TPACK. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3115–3142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09866-2

Haşlaman, T., Atman Uslu, N., & Mumcu, F. (2024). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers’ digital competencies based on DigCompEdu: A case study. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Irmak, M., & Yilmaz Tüzün, Ö. (2019). Investigating pre-service science teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) regarding genetics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1466778

Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9394-5

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285

Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5

Komarudin, K., Sari, E., Rinaldi, A., Laksono, P. J., Anggara, B., Ali, M., Sholeh, M., & Wigati, I. (2024). STEM-based digital pocket book: The design and implementation of students’ mathematical communication ability. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3058(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0200927

König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., & Glutsch, N. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among preservice teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 800–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804

Lautenbach, F., & Heyder, A. (2019). Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: A systematic review. Educational Research, 61(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596035

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430730992

Li, M., Noori, A. Q., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

Luik, P., Taimalu, M., Naruskov, K., & Kalk, K. (2024). Does knowledge according to the TPACK framework have an impact on student teachers’ beliefs? A path analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12767-z

Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: A literature review. 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018), 498–503. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114

Martin, D. A., Carey, M. D., McMaster, N., & Clarkin, M. (2024). Assessing primary school preservice teachers’ confidence to apply their TPACK in specific categories of technologies using a self-audit survey. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00669-x

Maskur, R., Suherman, S., Andari, T., Sri Anggoro, B., Muhammad, R. R., & Untari, E. (2022). The Comparison of STEM approach and SSCS learning model for secondary school-based on K-13 curriculum: The impact on creative and critical thinking ability. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22(70), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.507701

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nordin, H., Davis, N., & Ariffin, T. F. T. (2013). A case study of secondary pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge mastery level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.300

Ong, Q. K. L., & Annamalai, N. (2024). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for twenty-first century learning skills: The game changer for teachers of industrial revolution 5.0. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1939–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11852-z

Park, H., & Scanlon, D. (2024). General educators’ perceptions of struggling learners in an inaugural project-based learning Capstone. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2024.2310673

Potter, K., Kniss, J., Riesenfeld, R., & Johnson, C. R. (2010). Visualizing Summary Statistics and Uncertainty. Computer Graphics Forum, 29(3), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01677.x

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital competence of educators. Edited by Yves Punie. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Reyes Jr, V. C., Reading, C., Doyle, H., & Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.009

Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323

Saubern, R., Urbach, D., Koehler, M., & Phillips, M. (2020). Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology. Computers & Education, 147, 103784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Smith, P. G., & Zelkowski, J. (2023). Validating a TPACK instrument for 7–12 mathematics in-service middle and high school teachers in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(5), 858–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2048145

Sofyan, S., Habibi, A., Sofwan, M., Yaakob, M. F. M., Alqahtani, T. M., Jamila, A., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). TPACK–UotI: The validation of an assessment instrument for elementary school teachers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01533-0

Stoilescu, D. (2015). A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: Secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 514–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115572285

Suherman, S. (2018). Ethnomathematics: Eksploration of Traditional Crafts Tapis Lampung as Ilustration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i2.3085

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2024). Relationship between ethnic identity, attitude, and mathematical creative thinking among secondary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101448

Supriadi, N., Jamaluddin Z, W., & Suherman, S. (2024). The role of learning anxiety and mathematical reasoning as predictor of promoting learning motivation: The mediating role of mathematical problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101497

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1

Wicaksono, A. G. C., & Korom, E. (2023). Attitudes towards science in higher education: Validation of questionnaire among science teacher candidates and engineering students in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20023

Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C., & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782618

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2024 Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.