Quantitative analysis of university students’ perceptions of fairness in the distribution of domestic tasks and caregiving responsibilities

Main Article Content

Iratxe Suberviola Ovejas
Olaya Fernández Guerrero

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Responsibility-sharing in caregiving and domestic labour remains a critical concern in advancing gender equity. This study investigates Spanish university students’ perceptions of the distribution of household tasks and caregiving responsibilities, along with their evaluations of the fairness of this distribution. The primary aim is to explore how perceptions of fairness vary according to factors such as gender, age, exposure to gender equality education, parental employment status, family educational background, and place of residence. METHODOLOGY. The sample comprises university students from various academic disciplines across Spain (N = 1,287). Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire featuring Likert scales, validated using the Delphi method and exhibiting high internal consistency (α = .966). Initially, descriptive statistical analyses were performed, calculating the percentage distributions of responses across the entire student sample, both at the item level and within the broader categories under investigation. This provided a preliminary overview of the prevailing trends in perceptions and behaviors. Subsequently, multi-group analyses were conducted employing a range of statistical techniques to identify the significance of differences between subgroups. RESULTS. Findings indicate enduring gender asymmetries in perceived responsibility-sharing: 84% of respondents believe that mothers predominantly manage household chores, while 96.5% report that they also bear the primary responsibility for childcare. Significant differences emerged based on gender, age, and gender equality education, with male
participants perceiving a more equitable distribution than female participants reported. DISCUSSION. The study concludes that, despite increased awareness of gender equity, traditional patterns in the allocation of domestic and caregiving responsibilities persist. The findings underscore the need to strengthen educational initiatives and public policies aimed at fostering more balanced household roles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suberviola Ovejas, I., & Fernández Guerrero, O. (2025). Quantitative analysis of university students’ perceptions of fairness in the distribution of domestic tasks and caregiving responsibilities. Bordon. Revista De Pedagogia, 77(4), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2025.116309
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Iratxe Suberviola Ovejas, Universidad de La Rioja (España)

Doctora en Ciencias de la Educación, licenciada en psicopedagogía y diplomada en magisterio en la especialidad de educación infantil. Profesora Permanente Laboral la Universidad de La Rioja, en el Departamento de Ciencias de la educación, en el área de Didáctica y Organización escolar. Miembro del grupo de investigación “igualdad y género”. Directora de la microcredencial “Educar en y para la igualdad en ámbitos educativos y sociales”.

Olaya Fernández Guerrero, Universidad de La Rioja (España)

Doctora en Filosofía y Licenciada en Filosofía y en Ciencias de la Información. Profesora Contratada Doctora de Filosofía Moral en la Universidad de La Rioja, Departamento de Ciencias Humanas. Investigadora principal del grupo de investigación Igualdad y Género de la Universidad de La Rioja.

References

Alonso-Martirena, Y., Escudero, J. I., Monzón, J., Pellejero, L., & Suberviola, I. (2023). La corresponsabilidad en los cuidados en el contexto familiar en Navarra. Medición de la percepción del estudiantado universitario. Instituto de Igualdad de Navarra. https://bit.ly/4hOSWBy

Bianchi, S., Robinson, J., & Milkie, M. (2012). Changing rhythms of American family life. Russell Sage Foundation.

Cabero, J., & Infante, A. (2014). Empleo del método Delphi y su empleo en la investigación en comunicación y educación. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 48, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2014.48.187

Carlson, D., & Lynch, J. (2013). Housework: Cause and consequence of gender ideology? Social Science Research, 42(6), 1505–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.003

Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942

Craig, L., Mullan, K., & Blaxland, M. (2010). Parenthood, policy and work–family time in Australia 1992–2006. Work, Employment & Society, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017009353778

Cerrato, J., & Cifre, E. (2018). Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01330

Correll, S. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299

Davis, S., & Greenstein, T. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920

DeVellis, R., & Thorpe, C. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Díaz de Rada, V. (2012). Ventajas e inconvenientes de la encuesta por Internet. Papers, 97(1), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v97n1.71

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2024). Gender Equality Index: Time in European Union. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024/domain/time

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Unpaid care work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. https://bit.ly/44RrCz4

Fernández-Guerrero, O., Álvarez-Terán, R., Barbed, N., Martínez-López, M., & Suberviola, I. (2022). Aspectos de la conciliación personal, familiar y laboral en La Rioja y su incidencia en los derechos de la infancia. Un estudio sobre corresponsabilidad. https://investigacion.unirioja.es/documentos/64705b2c7bb1586d2f053976

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

Flood, M. (2019). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44208-6

Forste, R., & Fox, K. (2012). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.3138/JCFS.43.5.613

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non- statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Graham, E., Aleksa, E., Dzioba, A., Madou, E., Chen, T., Strychowsky, J. E., Hu, A., Chan, Y., & Seemann, N. M. (2024). Gender differences in domestic responsibilities of otolaryngologists. A mixed-methods analysis. The Laryngoscope, 134. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31605

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x

Hernández del Rosal, P., Laduj, I., & Lázaro, M. (2022). Hombres, corresponsabilidad y cuidados. Guía didáctica de corresponsabilidad masculina. Dirección General de Igualdad. Gobierno de La Rioja. https://bit.ly/45codd8

Hook, J. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state: Sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. American Journal of Sociology, 115(5), 1480–1523. https://doi.org/10.1086/651384

International Labour Organization. (2018). Care work and care workers for a future with decent work. https://www.ilo.org/publications/major-publications/care-work-and-care-jobs-future-decent-work

Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394014

Krause, W., & Gahn, C. (2024). Should we include margins of error in public opinion polls? European Journal of Political Research, 63(3), 1082–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12633

Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). More on the gendered division of household labor: A response to commentators. Sex Roles, 63, 801–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9885-0

Martínez-López, N. (2018). Estudio de la conciliación del área personal, familiar y profesional en enfermeras/os hospitalarios con cargas familiares [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Murcia]. https://digitum.um.es/digitum/handle/10201/56120

Molarius, A., & Metsini, A. (2023). The association between time spent in domestic work and mental health among women and men. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064948

Peña, J. V., Rodríguez-Menéndez, M. del C., & Torío, S. (2009). Opiniones de los progenitores sobre la participación de sus hijos e hijas en las labores domésticas. Bordón. Revista De Pedagogía, 61(4), 79–92. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/28815

Rola-Rubzen, M. F., Vuong, H. T., Doll, C., Rollins, C., Sarmiento, J. M., Alam, M. J., & Begum, I. A. (2023). Gender and rural transformation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 22(12), 3624–3637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.10.035

Suberviola, I. (2020a). La socialización diferencial emocional de género como factor predictor del carácter. iQual. Revista de Género e Igualdad, 3, 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/iqual.369611

Suberviola, I. (2020b). Aspectos básicos sobre el concepto y puesta en práctica de la coeducación emocional. Foro de educación, 18(1), 189–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.682

Suberviola, I., Barbed, N., Fernández-Guerrero, O., Martínez-López, M., & Álvarez-Terán, R. (2024). Gender micro violence: The lack of co-responsibility in the Northern Spain population. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies, 20(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327

Suberviola, I. (2025). Emotional Competencies and Emotional Coeducation Amongst University Students. International journal of emotional education, 17(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.56300/JRCJ3584

Suberviola, I., Barbed, N., Fernández-Guerrero, O., Martínez-López, M., & Álvarez-Terán, R. (2025). Análisis de la corresponsabilidad en los hogares y los cuidados. Una propuesta de intervención socio-educativa. iQual: Revista de Género e Igualdad, 8, 169–194. https://doi.org/10.6018/IQUAL.599311

Suberviola, I., & Fernández-Guerrero, O. (2025). Cuestionario corresponsabilidad jóvenes Rioja. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15008750Subirats,

M. (2020). El género masculino, entre la obsolescencia y la impostación. En A. Téllez, J. E. Martínez, & J. Sanfélix (Eds.), Hombres, género y patriarcado: reflexiones, cuerpos y representaciones (pp. 19–33). Dykinson.

Starrels, M. (1994). Husbands’ involvement in female gender-typed household chores. Sex Roles, 31, 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544202

Sukumaran, S., Somasundaran, R., & Naur, I. (2024). The double burden: A study on women’s dual roles in the workplace and household responsibilities in Kerala. Journal of Women Empowerment and Studies, 45, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.55529/jwes.45.48.60

Sullivan, O. (2018). The gendered division of household labor. En B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum, & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 377–392). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_27

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.