Métricas alternativas
Keywords
práctica pedagógica
tecnología avanzada
grabación en vídeo
formación preparatoria de profesores teacher educators
teaching practice
high technology
video recordings
Preservice teacher education
How to Cite
Abstract
Video-annotations enable new asynchronous interactions between author and reader, document multimedia evidence and promote reflection. With this frame of reference, a study is proposed to find out about good practices, as well as the impacts, difficulties and requirements necessary to implement technological resources in external placements in Education degrees. Twenty-six people with different roles took part in the study. Recorded interviews were conducted and examined by means of video-annotations, the data of which are treated with textual and factor analysis, together with a hierarchical classification technique. The results show 90 text segments consisting of 2,657 words and 751 supplementary active forms, which are grouped into six factors. The results show an unequal distribution of the variables established between the groups and a statistically significant relationship. It is concluded that there is confluence between the employment, communication and monitoring groups on the one hand, and the learning, typology and implications groups on the other. There is also a greater frequency in the categories ‘requirements’ and ‘impact’, which shows that the discourse of the interviewees focuses on questions related to the requirements necessary to implement technologies in the Practicum and the improvements they bring to this training period.
References
Aguillon, D.D.V., & Monterola, S.L.C. (2020). Impact of online collaborative video annotation on STEM students’ reflective thinking and academic self-discipline. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(1), 203-215.
Apple, M. W. (2018). Curricular form and the logic of technical control: building the possessive individual. En M. W. Apple (Ed.), Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education (pp. 8 – 28). Routledge.
Ardley, J., & Hallare, M. (2020). The feedback cycle: Lessons learned with video annotation software during student teaching. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520912343
Ardley, J., & Johnson, J. (2019). Video annotation software in teacher education: Researching university supervisor’s perspective of a 21st-century technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(4), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518812715
Benzécri, J.P. (1981). Practique del’Analyse des Données: linguistique et lexicologie. DUNOD.
Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., Gallego-Arrufat, M. J., & Cebrián-Robles, V. (2021). Multimedia Annotations for Practical Collaborative Reasoning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.664
Cebrián-Robles, D., Pérez, R. & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2017). Estudio de la comunicación en la evaluación de los diarios de prácticas que favorecen la argumentación. Revista Practicum, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v2i1.8262
Cebrián-Robles, D. & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2020). Recursos TIC para la evaluación en el Prácticum. En M. E. Martínez-Figueira & M. Raposo-Rivas (Coord.), Kit de supervivencia para el Prácticum de Educación Infantil y Primaria (pp. 53-72). Universitas.
Cebrián-Robles, V., Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., & Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2023). Revisión de la literatura sobre anotaciones de vídeo en la formación docente [Literature review on video annotations in teacher education]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 66, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.95782
Debbag, M., & Fidan, M. (2020). Examination of Text and Video-Formatted Learning Diaries in the Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.1
Fook, C.Y., & Nazamud-din, A. (2017). Strategies to enhance assignment and feedback practices in the 21st century classroom: A case study. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25 (S), 155-166.
Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2018). Contribuciones de las tecnologías para la evaluación formativa en el prácticum. Profesorado, 22(3), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7996
Gayoso-Cabada, J., Sarasa-Cabezuelo, A., & Sierra-Rodríguez, J.L. (2019). A review of annotation classification tools in the educational domain. Open Computer Science, 9(1), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2019-0021
Gragé, D., & Lebart, L. (1994). Traitements statistiques des enqûetes. DUNOD.
Lam, C.N.C., & Habil, H. (2021). The Use of Video Annotation in Education: A Review. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 84 - 94. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16208
Lebart, L.; Salem, A., & Bécue, M. (2000). Análisis estadístico de textos. Milenio.
McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning Science Teachers' Use of a Digital Video Annotation Tool to Promote Reflective Practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (3), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2
Mirriahi, N., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2018). Effects of instructional conditions and experience on student reflection: a video annotation study. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(6), 1245-1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1473845
Mirriahi, N., Jovanović, J., Lim, L.A., & Lodge, J.M. (2021). Two sides of the same coin: video annotations and in-video questions for active learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2571 - 2588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10041-4
Mirriahi, N., Liaqat, D., Dawson, S., & Gašević, D. (2016). Uncovering student learning profiles with a video annotation tool: reflective learning with and without instructional norms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1083-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9449-2
Monedero, J.J., Cebrián-Robles, D. & Desenne, P. (2015). Usabilidad y satisfacción en herramientas de anotaciones multimedia para MOOC. Comunicar, 22(44), 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-06
Novak, E., Razzouk, R., & Johnson, T.E. (2012). The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002
Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). The Use of Video Annotation Tools in Teacher Training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.090
Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Romero-López, M. A., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2020). Los diarios de prácticas como instrumento para promover la reflexión. En M. E. Martínez-Figueira & M. Raposo-Rivas (Coord.). Kit de supervivencia para el Prácticum de Educación Infantil y Primaria (pp. 35-50). Universitas.
Raposo-Rivas, M., & Martínez-Figueira, E. (2019). ¿Tecnologías emergentes o tecnologías emergiendo?: Un estudio contextualizado en la práctica preprofesional. Educar, 55(2), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.888
Raposo-Rivas, M.; Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Cebrián, M. (2019). RedTICPRaxis. Red sobre las TIC en el Prácticum y las prácticas externas. XV Symposium Internacional sobre el Prácticum y las prácticas externas. Presente y retos de futuro. Poio (Pontevedra), (pp. 306-320). https://acortar.link/AW0VEu
Raposo-Rivas, M.; García-Fuentes, O.; Martínez-Figueira, M.E. & Sarmiento-Campos, J.A. (2021). Casos de estudio sobre las TIC en el Prácticum: resultados en la Universidad de Vigo. En M. Raposo- Rivas et al. (coords). Prácticas externas virtuales versus presenciales: transformando los retos en oportunidades para la innovación, (pp. 126-130). https://acortar.link/BYwinT
Ratinaud, P., & Marchand P. (2012). Application de la méthode ALCESTE à de «gros» corpus et stabilité des «mondes lexicaux»: analyse du «CableGate» avec IRaMuTeQ. In: Actes des 11eme Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, (pp. 835-844), JADT Liège.
Reinert, M. (2003). Le rôle de la répétition dans la représentation du sens et son approche statistique par la méthode «ALCESTE». Semiotica-La HayeThen Berlin-, 147(1/4), 38–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.100
Rich, P.J., & Trip, T. (2011). Ten Essential Questions Educators Should Ask When Using Video Annotation Tools. TechTrends, 55(6), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0537-1
Rolf, R., Reuter, H., Abel, M., & Hamborg, K.-C. (2014). Requirements of students for video-annotations in lecture recordings. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 11(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-07-2014-0021
Romero, M.A.; Gallego, M.J.; Raposo-Rivas, M. & Cebrián, M. (2021). Análisis de videoexperiencias en la RedTICPraxis (Red sobre las TIC en prácticum y prácticas externas). En M. Raposo-Rivas et al. (coords). Prácticas externas virtuales versus presenciales: transformando los retos en oportunidades para la innovación, (pp. 100-108). https://acortar.link/BYwinT
Ruiz-Bueno, A. (2017). Trabajar con Iramuteq: pautas. Universidad de Barcelona. https://acortar.link/kM739r
Ruiz, F. J., Cebrián-Robles, V. & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2021). Redes profesionales en tiempo de Covid19: compartiendo buenas prácticas para el uso de TIC en el prácticum. Revista Practicum, 6(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v6i1.12283
Sarmiento, J.A.; Ocampo, C.I.; Barreira, A.J. Castr, M.D. & Rodríguez, P. (2019). El plagio en la educación superior: estudio estadístico textual de las opiniones del estudiantado. En M. Peralbo et al. (coords.). Actas del XV Congreso Internacional Gallegoportugués de Psicopedagogía. A Coruña, 4-6 de septiembre (pp. 3569-3584). https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497497268
Sauli, F., Cattaneo, A., & Van der Meij, H. (2018). Hypervideo for educational purposes: a literature review on a multifaceted technological tool. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1407357
Von Wachter, J-K, & Lewalter, D. (2023). Video Annotation as a Supporting Tool for Video-based Learning in Teacher Training – A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Higher Education, 12 (2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v12n2p1
Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R., Shui, H., & Zhang, R. (2020). Reading and Connecting: Using Social Annotation in online Classes. EdArXiv.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Pixel-Bit. Media and Education Journal