A systematic review of the effectiveness of the station rotation model in blended learning
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Teachers need to prepare students for 21st century skills using emerging technologies and innovative teaching methodologies. Station Rotation Model (SRM) as an innovative Blended Learning model, combines teacher’s instruction, group work and online learning in a classroom setting where learners can rotate in groups at the stations prepared by the teacher. It has several benefits and challenges for the learners and the teacher. METHOD. To date, only a few reviews have been found related to the effectiveness of the Station Rotation Model. Therefore, this systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines to ensure transparency and quality, addresses this gap of research through a comprehensive examination of different studies. Specific research questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a list of quality criteria were established. RESULTS. This review analysed 30 studies that showed the importance of consistent implementation of the model. Students consistently reported positive experiences, particularly in collaboration, satisfaction, and motivation, due to its dynamic learning environment. The data underlined that it is a stimulating way of learning based on a personalised experience with a high degree of autonomy enriched by the use of technology. It also highlighted SRM’s ability to develop critical and higher-order thinking skills through team-based and collaborative online learning. Additionally, the review demonstrated the model’s adaptability across various designs and modalities, including virtual station rotation, showcasing its potential to address diverse learning needs. DISCUSSION. SRM shows strong potential for enhancing learning outcomes, transferable skills, and student satisfaction. However, its implementation, activity sequence, and effects on various subjects require further study. Educators could explore different SRM designs to maximize its benefits in blended learning settings, highlighting the need for ongoing research. This study provides insights for future research and education by adopting mix methodologies in the basic education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Abdelmalak, M. M. M. (2024). Promoting selected core thinking skills using math stations rotation. Research in Mathematics Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2024.2344209
Akinoso, S. O., Agoro, A. A., & Alabi, O. M. (2020). Effect of Station Rotation Mode of Instructional Delivery for Mathematics in the Era of Advancing Technology. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 24(2), 60–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1304479.pdf
Ayob, N. F. S., Halim, N. D. A., Zulkifli, N. N., Zaid, N. M., & Mokhtar, M. (2020). Overview of blended learning: The effect of station rotation model on students’ achievement. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.56
CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Connor, C. O., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., & Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
Dos Santos, L. S. B., Benevides, R. G., Amorim, C. R. N., Santos, R. M. F., de Oliveira, S. S., & Granjeiro, É. M. (2021). Innovation in the teaching of human physiology at university and school: pedagogical process based on interdisciplinarity and learning station rotation. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(3), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00154.2020
Euphrasio, P. C. S., Faria, L. A., Germano, J. S. E., & Hirata, D. (2020). Improving Teaching-Learning Process in MIL-STD-1553B Bus Classes Using a New Hybrid Web-Lab Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(4), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2984882
Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended Learning in Middle School Math: The Question of Effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49–64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/full-text/EJ1208816.pdf
Fitri, S., Syahputra, E., & Syahputra, H. (2019). Blended learning rotation model of cognitive conflict strategy to improve mathematical resilience in high school students. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 80–87.
Fulbeck, E., Atchison, D., Giffin, J., Seidel, D., & Eccleston, M. (2020). Personalizing Student Learning With Station Rotation: A Descriptive Study. American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/resource/report/personalized-student-learning-station-rotation-descriptive-study
Govindaraj, A., & Silverajah, V. S. G. (2017). Blending flipped classroom and station rotation models in enhancing students’ learning of physics. ICETC ‘17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers. 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3175536.3175543
Hadiprayitno, G., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, A., Lukitasari, M., & Sukri, A. (2021). Blended Learning Station-Rotation Model: Does it Impact on Preservice Teachers’ Scientific Literacy? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.676
Hite, R., Greenhalgh-Spencer, H., & Childers, G. (2022). Differentiation in the Life Science Classroom Using Station Rotations. Science Scope, 45(5), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08872376.2022.12291479
Horn, M. B. & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. Jossey-Bass.
Hover, A., & Wise, T. (2020). Exploring ways to create 21st century digital learning experiences. Education 3-13, 50(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1826993
Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y., & Boloudakis, M. (2020). Orchestrating the technology-enhanced embodied learning classroom via learning stations rotation: A case study. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2712, 25–28. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2712/paper03.pdf
Jacobs, J. (2014). Beyond the Factory Model: Oakland teachers learn how to blend. Education Next, 14(4), 34-41. https://www.educationnext.org/beyond-factory-model/
Jorajuria, I. & Usart, M. (2025). Modelo Rotación por Estaciones para la mejora del rendimiento en ciencias en secundaria: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 43. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.599901
Kim, J. H. (2021). Music teachers’ understanding of blended learning in Korean elementary music classes. Music Education Research, 23(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1862776
Lonigro, M. (2021). Rotation stations for a blended approach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2817. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2817/paper33.pdf
Mahalli, Nurkamto, J., Mujiyanto, J., & Yuliasri, I. (2019). The Implementation of Station Rotation and Flipped Classroom Models of Blended Learning in EFL Learning. English Language Teaching, 12(12), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n12p23
Maxwell, C., & White, J. (2017). Blended (R)evolution: How 5 teachers are modifying Station Rotation. Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/stationrotation/
McCollum, T. (2019). A Comparison of a Station Rotation Blended Learning Classroom to a Traditional Classroom Using NWEA MAP (Publication No. 13878915) [Doctoral Thesis, Mc-Kendree University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Nida, N. K., Usodo, B., & Sari Saputro, D. R. (2020). The blended learning with Whatsapp media on Mathematics creative thinking skills and math anxiety. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.16233
Novak, K. & Tucker, C. R. (2021). UDL and Blended Learning: Thriving in Flexible Learning Landscapes. IMpress.D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., Hibbard, L., Oglesby, J., & Verma, S. (2015). Blended Learning: The Evolution of Online and Face-to-Face Education from 2008-2015. The International Association for K–12 Online Learning, 1–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED560788
Prasetya, S. P. (2016). The Differences in Learning Outcomes of Geography Students Using Rotation Models. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geography and Education (ICGE 2016), 357-361. https://doi.org/10.2991/icge-16.2017.69
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital inmigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Rembach, O., Liubych, O., Antonenko, M., Kovalenko, V., & Valieiev, R. (2019). University Students` Satisfaction: The Impact of Computer-mediated Blended Learning. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 221–241. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/186
Roach, H. A. (2020). Effects of Blended Learning Using the Rotation Model on Fourth and Fifth Grade Students’ Mathematics Scores (Publication No. 28150635) [Doctoral Thesis, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Saifuddin, Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., Dwiyogo, W. D., & Nugroho, H. S. W. (2018). The effect of blended learning and self-efficacy on learning outcome of problem solving (Learning strategy improvement for health students). Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(11), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01481.X
Seitova, M., & Khalmatova, Z. (2025). The blended learning station rotation model in EFL teaching: opinions of the implementer. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(1), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1438392
Sinta Dewi Sekarwati, R., Made Putrawan, I., & Neolaka, A. (2019). The effect of blended learning strategy and students’ personality on the students’ knowledge about the basic concepts of ecology. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(9 Special Issue), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V11/20192582
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K – 12 Blended Learning. INNOSIGHT Institute, 1–22. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Truitt, A. A., & Ku, H.-Y. (2018). A case study of third grade students’ perceptions of the station rotation blended learning model in the United States. Educational Media International, 55(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484042
UNESCO (2023). What you need to know about digital learning and transformation of education. https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/need-know
Valieiev, R., Pokaichuk, Y., Zhbanchyk, A., Polyvaniuk, V., Nykyforova, O., & Nedria, K. (2021). In the Search for the Golden Mean: Students` Satisfaction with Face-to-Face, Blended and Distance Learning. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/357
Vega-Bajana, Y. (2019). An exploratory case study of the blended learning station rotation model as a catalyst for technology integration by novice teachers (Publication No. 28150843) [Doctoral Thesis, New Jersey City University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Walne, M. B. (2012). Emerging Blended-Learning Models and School Profiles, 1–26. https://www.edustart.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10Emerging+BL+Models+and+School+Profiles+FINAL+09.21.12.pdf
Wong, S. F., Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. S. (2022). Blackboard and Virtual Station Rotation Model: Effectiveness of Learning Calculus. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations (ICIEI 2022), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3535735.3535741
Yang, S., & Newman, R. (2019). Rotational Blended Learning in Computer System Engineering Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2899095
Yılmaz, Y., & Açıkgül Fırat, E. (2024). Station-rotation blended learning model in science education a case study for rural classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2394707