Una revisión sistemática del desarrollo de la experiencia adaptativa de los docentes de educación infantil, primaria y secundaria
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
INTRODUCCIÓN. Esta revisión sistemática explora el concepto de pericia adaptativa en la educación preescolar, primaria y secundaria, buscando identificar sus características clave y cómo fomentar su desarrollo. La capacidad de los docentes para ajustar sus estrategias a situaciones novedosas y complejas, equilibrando competencia rutinaria e innovación, se conoce como pericia adaptativa. MÉTODO. Una búsqueda en Web of Science, centrada en estudios publicados entre 2012 y 2024, identificó 112 estudios, de los cuales 28 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se empleó la lista CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) y se siguieron las normas PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for ystematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses) para garantizar un proceso transparente en la selección y evaluación de los artículos. RESULTADOS. La revisión indica que la práctica reflexiva, los métodos centrados en el estudiante, la flexibilidad y la resolución creativa de problemas son características de la pericia adaptativa. Las pedagogías prácticas, la indagación reflexiva, la mentoría y los entornos que fomenten la experimentación y el riesgo son enfoques clave para su desarrollo. DISCUSIÓN. Los hallazgos sugieren que los programas de formación docente deben priorizar la reflexión, la colaboración y ciclos iterativos de práctica y retroalimentación. También se recomienda incorporar tecnologías digitales para fomentar la innovación en métodos de enseñanza. Según la revisión, los docentes deben poseer pericia adaptativa para responder eficazmente a las diversas y cambiantes necesidades de los estudiantes, especialmente de los estudiantes de inglés (ELL), promoviendo eficiencia en tareas rutinarias y flexibilidad ante nuevas situaciones. Las implicaciones incluyen mejoras en la selección de personal, autoeficacia docente, desarrollo profesional para instructores de contenido que enseñan a estudiantes ELL y retención de personal.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Citas
Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
Athanases, S. Z., Bennett, L. H., & Wahleithner, J. M. (2015). Adaptive Teaching for English Language Arts. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x15590915
Baldinger, E. E., & Munson, J. (2020). Developing adaptive expertise in the wake of rehearsals: An emergent model of the debrief discussions of non-rehearsing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103125. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103125
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
Bowers, N., Merritt, E., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2019). Exploring Teacher Adaptive Expertise in the Context of Elementary School Science Reforms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2019.1651613
Bowles, R., Sweeney, T., & Coulter, M. (2023). Using Collaborative self-study to support professional learning in initial teacher education: developing pedagogy through Meaningful Physical Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2282369
CASP (2021). Critical Appraisal Checklists. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
Crawford, V. M., Vahey, P., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., & Riel, M. (2005). Characterizing Adaptive Expertise in Science Teaching. SRI International.
den Hertog, G., Louws, M., van Rijswijk, M., & van Tartwijk, J. (2023). Utilising previous professional expertise by second-career teachers: Analysing case studies using the lens of transfer and adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104290
Ebby, C. B., Remillard, J. T., & Goldsmith-Markey, L. T. (2023). Learning to Teach Responsively Through Asynchronous Collaborative Discourse Around Video Records of Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 74, 002248712311531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231153108
Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N. A. R., Abu-Tineh, A., Alshaboul, Y., & Alazaizeh, M. A. (2025). A Step-by-Step Approach to Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 549–566.
Gravett, S., Van der Merwe, D., Ramsaroop, S., Tshabalala, P., Bremner, C., & Mello, P. (2023). Mixed-Reality Simulation to Support Practice Learning of Preservice Teachers. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101062
Hanushek, E. A. (2021). Addressing cross-national generalizability in educational impact evaluation. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102318
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azmuma, & K. Hakuta (eds.), Child development and education in Japan. W.Y. Freeman and Co.
Hunskaar, T. S., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2023). Tool-based mentoring conversations in teacher education: new structures, opportunities and the role of adaptive expertise. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 12(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-12-2022-0103
Lee, K.-T., Chalmers, C., Chandra, V., Yeh, A., & Nason, R. (2014). Retooling Asian-Pacific teachers to promote creativity, innovation and problem solving in science classrooms. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.864017
Lee, S.-S., & Hung, D. (2016). A socio-cultural perspective to teacher adaptivity: the spreading of curricular innovations in Singapore schools. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1132862
Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward teachers’ adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6
Linda, L., Seah, L. H., & Chia, T. T. (2025). Assessing science teachers’ adaptive expertise in teaching disciplinary literacy using the AEDLi Framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159, 104999–104999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104999
Männikkö, I., & Husu, J. (2019). Examining teachers’ adaptive expertise through personal practical theories. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.016
McGraw, A., & Walker, A. (2024). The Role of Adaptive Expertise in Sustaining School-University Partnerships in Increasingly Complex Times. In C. A. Green, & M. J. Eady, Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships: Building Connections Across Diverse Educational Systems. Springer Nature.
Meneses, A., Nussbaum, M., María Graciela Veas, & Arriagada, S. (2023). Practice-based 21st-century teacher education: Design principles for adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104118–104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104118
Moran, R. M. R., Robertson, L., Tai, C., Ward, N. A., & Price, J. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ adaptive expertise through STEM-CT integration in professional development and residency placements. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1267459
Munson, J., Baldinger, E. E., & Larison, S. (2021). What if…? Exploring thought experiments and non-rehearsing teachers’ development of adaptive expertise in rehearsal debriefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103222
Newberry, M., & Hinchcliff, E. (2024). Navigating teacher-student relationships during and beyond the pandemic. Educational Research, 66(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2332221
Newell, G. E., Goff, B., Thanos, T., Kwak, S., Buescher, E., & Weyand, L. (2017). Adaptive Expertise in the Teaching and Learning of Literary Argumentation in High School Language Arts Classrooms. In R. K. Durst, G. E. Newell, & J. D. Marshall (eds.), English Language Arts Research and Teaching: Revisiting and Extending Arthur Applebee’s Contributions. Routledge.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Buntins, K., Bond, M., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S. (eds.) (2019). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research Methodology, Perspectives and Application. (pp. 41–54). Wiesbaden Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden Gmbh Springer Vs.
Opre, D. (2015). Adaptive expertise: Efficiency and innovation. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(2), 115–128.
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80010-6
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme (Vol. 1). Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1-April2006.pdf
Reimann, P., Freebody, P., & Hornibrook, M. (2009). Designing for immersive learning environments: A study of teacher innovation using the learning federation (TLF) digital learning resources. 8th European Conference on ELearning 2009, ECEL 2009. 8th European Conference on eLearning 2009, ECEL 2009.
Rosaen, C. L., Carlisle, J. F., Mihocko, E., Melnick, A., & Johnson, J. (2013). Teachers learning from analysis of other teachers’ reading lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.007
Saleh, M. R., Ibrahim, B., & Afari, E. (2023). Exploring the Relationship Between Attitudes of Preservice Primary Science Teachers Toward Integrated STEM Teaching and Their Adaptive Expertise in Science Teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10369-8
Schipper, T., Goei, S. L., de Vries, S., & van Veen, K. (2018). Developing teachers’ self-efficacy and adaptive teaching behaviour through lesson study. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.011
Schleicher, A. (2016). International Summit on the Teaching Profession Teaching Excellence through Professional Learning and Policy Reform Lessons from around the World. OECD Publishing.
Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1–51). Information Age Publishing.
Serrano, A. C. B., Roselló, T. C., Royo, I., & San Miguel, I. (2024). Desarrollo profesional docente a través de un proyecto participativo: Una investigación colaborativa. Bordón: Revista de pedagogía, 76(1), 13-30.
Soha Zoelfakar, & Charles, T. (2024). English Teachers’ Reflective Practice in the UAE. English Language Education, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69789-0_8
Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 768–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.009
Stigler, J. W., & Miller, K. F. (2018). Expertise and Expert Performance in Teaching. In R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 431–452). Cambridge University Press.
Tetzlaff, J., Page, M., & Moher, D. (2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Value in Health, 23(10), S312–S313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1154
Tsui, A. B. M. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 15(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903057179
UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO (2018). Global education monitoring report, 2019: Migration, displacement and education: building bridges, not walls (2nd edition). UNESCO Publishing.
van Tartwijk, J., van Dijk, E. E., Geertsema, J., Kluijtmans, M., & van der Schaaf, M. (2022). Teacher expertise and how it develops during teachers’ professional lives. In R. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (p. pp. 170–179). Elsevier Science.
Von Esch, K. S., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2017). Preparing Mainstream Classroom Teachers of English Learner Students: Grounding Practice-Based Designs for Teacher Learning in Theories of Adaptive Expertise Development. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 239–251. Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117717467
Walsh, M. E., Witherspoon, E. B., Schunn, C. D., & Matsumura, L. C. (2023). Mental simulations to facilitate teacher learning of ambitious mathematics instruction in coaching interactions. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00401-2
Warren, A. N., & Kersten-Parrish, S. (2022). Developing as a literacy teacher: sense-making and ownership in an online master’s course. Teaching Education, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.2022643
Wetzel, A. P., De Arment, S. T., & Reed, E. (2015). Building teacher candidates’ adaptive expertise: engaging experienced teachers in prompting reflection. Reflective Practice, 16(4), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1064380
Xiang, X., Chang, P., & Yu, B. (2022). Exploring an EAP writing teacher’s adaptive expertise and adaptive teaching practices from a CDST perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957429
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. Sagepub. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971