Métricas alternativas
Keywords
modelos pedagógicos
currículum
tarea enriquecida
tecnología digital Interdisciplinary
Transdisciplinary
integrated
Curriculum
How to Cite
Abstract
La pandemia del COVID-19 ha puesto de manifiesto la importancia de que los estudiantes sean capaces de aprender de forma flexible: aprovechando las oportunidades de la enseñanza presencial y el aprendizaje en línea en la educación, siendo autónomos y creativos, y colaborando con el personal educativo y los compañeros, a menudo en entornos virtuales digitales.
Este artículo analiza los enfoques interdisciplinares alternativos que rompen las barreras artificiales entre las disciplinas mediante el uso de las "tareas enriquecidas", es decir, tareas interdisciplinares que integran el conocimiento de las materias con el desarrollo de las habilidades de los estudiantes en las 4C: colaboración, pensamiento crítico, comunicación y creatividad. El artículo propone las "tareas enriquecidas" como una metodología que sirve para la educación del futuro, ya que se centra en el aprendizaje de las habilidades globales y emocionalmente resilientes que los niños necesitan para adaptarse a un mundo digital en contante transformación y en el que pueden cambiar de trabajo muchas veces.
En la investigación se exploraron los enfoques interdisciplinares históricos y actuales, y se realizaron entrevistas con profesionales y alumnos clave que participaron en ellos. Se encontraron respuestas significativamente positivas hacia el enfoque interdisciplinar por parte de ambos grupos de encuestados. En las conclusiones se propone el desarrollo de "Tareas enriquecidas" (véanse las definiciones de Moulds, 2004) apoyándose en el aumento de conocimientos y la experiencia en la utilización de la tecnología digital que los profesores han adquirido para enseñar durante la pandemia en todo el mundo.
References
ACARA (2021). The Australian National Curriculum. Sydney. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). https://bit.ly/321wtN3
Appleby, M. (2019). What are the benefits of interdisciplinary study. Milton Keynes. Open University. https://bit.ly/39H4pTm
Bhatti, A. & Jumani, N. (2019). Understanding curriculum. MESHGuide. Education Futures Collaboration charity. https://bit.ly/3mnRJpC
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay.
Breslin, T. (2015). Subject hierarchies and the purpose of learning. British Educational Research Association. https://bit.ly/2PuYV7k
Breslin, T. (2021). Lessons from lockdown. Routledge.England.
Capel, S., Lawrence, J., Leask, M., & Younie, S. (2019). Surviving and Thriving in the Secondary School: The NQT’s Essential Companion (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351037143
CBI (2019). Education and Learning for the Modern World. Pearson. https://bit.ly/3dyDjyN
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. University of Chicago press.
Education Queensland (2000). Queensland State Education 2010. Brisbane. Office of Strategic planning and portfolio services.
Education Queensland (2000). The New Basics Project paper. Education Queensland. https://bit.ly/3rNjloV
European School Net (2021). http://www.eun.org
Furaso, M. (2008). What is Teaching for Understanding. Harvard Graduate school of Education. USA. https://bit.ly/3cW5Cs1
Glob, P.V. (1969). The Bog People: Iron man preserved. Faber and Faber.
Glow Connect .(2021). https://glowconnect.org.uk
Gov.uk. (2021). Guidance, English Baccalaureate. London. UK Parliament. https://bit.ly/2Pu7W0s
Haines, S., & Thomas, S. (2005). The ‘new basics’ in a traditional High School-Teacher experiences in aligning curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Conference Paper at the redesigning pedagogy: research. Policy. Practice. Singapore.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society. Teachers College Press.
Harris, C. (1998). Intertextuality in the classroom. (unpublished master’s thesis.) Institute of Education. London.
Hockerill Anglo-European college (2021). IB Diploma Programme. https://bit.ly/3rRwDkr
Homewood School and 6th form college (2017). Curriculum Policy. https://bit.ly/3wsHkgM
International Baccalaureate: (2021). Education for a better world. https://www.ibo.org/
Keuchal, T., Beaudry, J., & Ritz-Swain, S. (2015,). Visual literacy. MESHGuide. Education Futures Collaboration charity. https://bit.ly/3mtSYna
Leask, M., & Younie, S. (2021). Ensuring Education for all in times of Crisis. Routledge.
Matthews, B. (2021). Aims and values. In B. Hudson, M. Leask & S. Younie (Eds.). Education System Design: Foundations, Policy Options and Consequences (1st ed.) (pp.2-11). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261190
Mirandanet (2021). https://mirandanet.ac.uk/
Moulds, P. (2004). Rich Tasks: open ended tasks involve students in connecting learning to the real world. Education Leadership, December 2003 - January 2004, 75-78. https://bit.ly/2Q16emN
OECD (2021). Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD. https://bit.ly/31NUtmy
Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins F.P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues, (7th edition). Pearson Education.
Outhwaite, D. (2017). Educational Leadership in the International Baccalaureate: critical reflections on modern elite formation and social differentiation. Unpublished doctoral thesis. https://bit.ly/3urhuYJ
Outhwaite, D., & Ferri, G. (2017). Critical Reflections on Modern Elite Formation and Social Differentiation in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme in England. Oxford Review of Education, 43(4), 402-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1329719
Pudiyono. (2019). Applying the Twenty first century Skills (4C Skills) in present classroom Instructions. Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International conference. http://10.2991/pfeic-19.2019.1
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of Instruction. Research based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12-15.
RSA (2021). What is opening minds https://bit.ly/3mpjyNX
Sizer, T. (1990). Performance and Exhibitions: The demonstrations of Mastery. Horace, 6(3), 1-11 https://bit.ly/3mm0ArA
Streeting, W. (2020). Let’s face the future again. Fabian ideas no 651.Fabian Society.
Tait, C. (2016). A good day’s work. What workers think about work, and how politics should respond. Fabian Society.
The State of Queensland (Department of Education and Arts (2004). The New Basics Research Report. Brisbane, Queensland.
Wasserberg M. (2008). Human Scale thinking at the heart of a large school. Calouste. Gulbenkian foundation.
Watanabe-Crockett, L. (2018). The best critical thinking tools aligned with Bloom’s taxonomy. https://bit.ly/3fLmRxK
Wiske, M.S. (1999). What is Teaching for Understanding? In J. Leach., & B. Moon (Eds.). Learners and Pedagogy. The Open University and Paul Chapman Publishing.
Williams, L. (2014). Using ICT in the secondary school. In Capel, S., Leask, M., & Younie, S. (Eds.). (2013). Learning to Teach in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123409
Worton, M., & Still, J. (1990). Intertextuality; theories and practices. Manchester university Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Pixel-Bit. Media and Education Journal