Assessment in initial training: progress or regression?

Main Article Content

Laura Cañadas
María Luisa Santos-Pastor
Francisco Javier Castejón

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Assessment is a key element in the teaching and grading processes. The variability of assessment instruments make it possible to know more precisely what the students have learned. At the same time, the participation of students in the assessment and grading processes will allow them to assume a leading role in their learning, assessing their own work and that of their peers. The aims of this research are: (a) to know if there has been a change over time in the type of the assessment instruments used and their frequency of use in initial training; (b) to assess how students have perceived the use of grading forms and how they have changed over time. METHOD. A total of 2361 students on the fourth year of Primary Education Degree (70.7%) and Physical Activity and Sport Sciences Degree (29.3%) participated. The answers of 1127 participants were collected during 2010/2011 academic year and 1234 during 2014/2015 academic year. RESULTS. The results show (a) that there has been an increase in the frequency of use of assessment instruments between the 2010/2011 academic year and the 2014/2015 academic year, with written and test-type exams showing the highest frequency; and (b) shared grading shows significant differences between the studies, decreasing their use over time, while the rest of the grading forms studied do not show significant differences between both studies, there is a prevailing use of teacher grading. DISCUSSION. Although there has been an increase in the use of the different assessment instruments, they are still overall the same as they were in the past and teacher grading is maintained as the most used grading form.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cañadas, L., Santos-Pastor, M. L., & Castejón, F. J. (2018). Assessment in initial training: progress or regression?. Bordon. Revista De Pedagogia, 70(4), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2018.64434
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Laura Cañadas, Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Personal Docente e Investigador en Formación del Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Miembro de la Red Nacional de Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en Educación Superior. Sus principales líneas de investigación incluyen las competencias docentes y la evaluación formativa en Educación Superior.

María Luisa Santos-Pastor, Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Profesora Titular de Universidad del Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Sus principales publicaciones y líneas de investigación se centran en la docencia, evaluación e innovación en Educación Superior.

Francisco Javier Castejón, Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Profesor Titular de Universidad del Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Motricidad Humana en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Sus principales publicaciones y líneas de investigación se centran en la docencia, evaluación e innovación en Educación Superior.

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.