Assembly functioning as consensus mechanisms in the process of group creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.85784Keywords:
artistic creation; teamwork; physical education; initial training; higher education; social interactionAbstract
This article outlines the factors of social interaction that facilitate and hamper the process of group creation in an interdisciplinary acrosport project based on sustainable development goals called “The hostage voice”. The sample consisted of 65 students –36 men and 29 women– with an average age of 21.42±1.69 from the physical education module of the of Primary Education Bachelor at the Faculty of Education of the University of Zaragoza -Spain-. Each creation group designed and showed an acrosport proposal based on the sustainable development goals, which was elaborated during the course of three subjects of the mentioned module -physical activities of opposition-collaboration; individual physical activities; and artistic-expressive physical activities-. Data regarding the social interaction triggered by the group creation process was collected through reports filled out by each group. Later, the content analysis of these reports was carried out. For the analysis of the data, the software NVIVO 11 was used. The results showed that: a) the assembly discussion is the main mechanism used for collective consensus, b) the group commitment favours the processes of creation.
References
Ahumada, L., Maureira, O., & Castro, S. (2019). Fortalecer el liderazgo distribuido en escuelas y liceos mediante indagación colaborativa. Profesorado: Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 23(2), 211-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i2.9252
Ali, A., Wang, H., & Johnson, R.E. (2020). Empirical Analysis of Shared Leadership Promotion and Team Creativity: An Adaptive Leadership Perspective. Journal of organizational behavior, 41(5), 405-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2437
Alonso, L.E. (2012). Un año después del 15-M, ¿el resurgir del conflicto social juvenil? Temas para el debate, 211, 34-37.
Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal.
Bicocca, M. (2018). Competencias, capacidades y Educación Superior. Repensando el desarrollo humano en la Universidad. Estudios sobre Educación, 34, 29-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/004.34.29-46
Botella, M., Glaveanu, V., Zenasni, F., Storme, M, Myszkowski, N. Wolff, M. & Lubar, T. (2013). How artist create: creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.008
Canales-Lacruz, I. & Rovira, G. (2020). Social interaction and group work in corporal expression activities. Research in dance education, 21, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2020.1808606
Capllonch, M., Figueras, S., & Castro, M. (2018). Estrategias para la resolución de conflictos en educación física. Apunts, 133: 50-67.
De Juanas, A. (2010). Aprendices y competencias en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Revista de psicología y educación, 1(5), 171-186.
Delval, J. A., & Lomelí, P. (2013). La educación democrática para el siglo XXI. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Elliot, J. (2000). El cambio educativo desde la investigación-acción [Educational change from action-research]. Madrid: Morata.
Fischer, S., Oget, D. & Cavalluci, D. (2016). The evaluation of creativity from the perspective of subject matter and training in higher education: Issues, constraints and limitations. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 123-135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.002
Giguere, M. (2011). Dancing thoughts: an examination of children’s cognition and creative process in dance. Research in Dance Education, 12(1), 5-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2011.554975
Han, J., Han, J. & Brass, D. (2014). Human capital diversity in the creation of social capital for team creativity. Journal of organizational behavior, 35, 54-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1853
Hidayati, N., Zubaidah, S., Suarsini, E., & Praherdhiono, H. (2020). Cognitive Learning Out-comes: Its Relationship with Communication Skills and Collaboration Skills through Digital Mind Maps-Integrated PBL. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(6). DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.6.1404
Hurtado, J. B., & Tercero, M. J. O. (2011). Las Corrientes Pedagógicas Contemporáneas y los estilos de enseñanza en la Educación Física. Investigación Educativa, 14(26), 79-104.
Larraz, N., Antoñanzas, J.L., & Salavera, C. (2019). El desarrollo de la creatividad en el alumnado universitario. Propuesta de intervención en el grado de Magisterio de Educación Infantil. In S. Alonso, Romero, J.M., Rodríguez, C., & Sola, J. Investigación, innovación docente y TIC. Nuevos horizontes educativos (pp.1452-1461). Madrid: Dykinson.
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Leach, J., & Stevens, C.J. (2020). Relational creativity and improvisation in contemporary dance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1712541
Leung, A.K., Liou, S., Tsai, M., & Koh, B. (2018). Mood-Creativity relationship in groups: the role of equality in idea contribution in temporal mood effects. Journal of creative behavior, 54(1), 165-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.353
Lizalde, M., Peñarrubia, C., Murillo-Pardo, B., Latorre, J., & Canales-Lacruz, I. (2019). Aprendizaje por proyectos e interdisciplinariedad en la mención de educación física del grado maestro de primaria. Retos, 35, 314-318.
López, M. C., León, M. J., & Pérez, P. (2018). El enfoque por competencias en el contexto universitario español. La visión del profesorado. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 529-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.314351
Lucznik, K. (2017). Between minds and bodies: some insights about creativity from dance im-provisation. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of speculative research, 3(3), 23-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/tear.13.3.301_1
Lucznik, K., Jackson, A., Sakuta, A., & Siarava, E. (2015). Let’s Improv It: The embodied investigation of social collaboration. Avant, 8, 301-308. DOI: 10.26913/80s02017.0111.0027
Moll, A., Lambert, S., Visker, J., Dunseith, N., Wang, A., Azim, S., & Cox, C. C. (2019). A case study activity to assess nursing students’ perceptions of their inter professional healthcare team’s collaborative decision-making process. Journal of Interprofessional Education y Practice, 14, 18-21. DOI: 10.1016/J.XJEP.2018.11.005
Monzonís, N. (2015). La educación física como elemento de mejora en al competencia social y ciudadana [Tesis doctoral]. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/370837/NMM_1de2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acceso en: 23 feb. 2020.
Naciones Unidas (2015). Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2015/09/la-asamblea-general-adopta-la-agenda-2030-para-el-desarrollo-sostenible/
Ness, I. J., & Søreide, G. E. (2014). The room of opportunity: Understanding phases of creative knowledge processes in innovation. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(8), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0077
Pérez-Albarracín, A., & Fernández-Baena, J. (2019). Más allá de la resolución de conflictos: Promoción de aprendizajes socioemocionales en el alumnado mediador [Beyond conflict resolu-tion: socio-emocional Learning in student mediators]. Electronic journal of research in education psychology, 17(2), 355-358. ISSN:1696-2095
Pillay, N., Park, G., Kim, Y.K., & Lee, S. (2020). Thanks for your ideas: Gratitude and team creativity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 136, 69-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.005
Remesal, A., & Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence and online collaborative small grupo work: A socioconstructivist account. Computers and Education, 60, 357-367. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.009
Rovira, G. (2019). Danza y expresión corporal. Victoria-Gasteiz: Bradu 20 SL.
Rial, R., & Villanueva, C. (2016). Propuesta de innovación educativa en expresión corporal y danza. Retos, 29, 126-128. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/35394/25437
Rymer, J. (2017). An argument for Investigation into Collaborative, Choreomusical Relationships within Contemporary Performance: A Practical and Theoretical Enquiry into the Distinct Contributions of a Collaborative, Co-creative Approach. Avant Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 7, 181-196. DOI: 10.26913/80s02017.0111.0017
Sánchez-Elvira, A., López-González, M.A., & Fernández-Sánchez, M.V. (2010). Análisis de las competencias genéricas en los nuevos títulos de grado del EEES en las universidades españolas. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1), 35-75.
Serrat, A. (Coord.) (2002). Resolución de conflictos: una perspectiva globalizadora. Barcelona: Cis-spraxis.
Tang, M. (2019). Fostering creativity in intercultural and interdisciplinary teams: The VICTORY model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02020
Terrén, E. (2003). Educación democrática y ciudadanía multicultural: el reaprendizaje de la convivencia. Revista Praxis, 3, 5-28.
Torrents, C., Castañer, M., Dinušová, D., & Anguera, M.T. (2008). El efecto del modelo docente y de la interacción con compañeros en las habilidades motrices creativas de la Danza. Un formato de campo para su análisis y obtención de T-patterns motrices. Retos, 14, 5-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Berta Murillo-Pardo, Inma Canales-Lacruz, Silvia Lorente-Echeverría, Ana Corral-Abós
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
