Serving up self-efficacy: how modern training methods empower elite junior tennis players
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v66.106976Keywords:
racket sports, coaching, psychology, performance, skill acquisitionAbstract
Introduction: Mastering the game of tennis requires a combination of complex technical, tactical, physical, and mental skills. Tennis training has evolved to support elite junior players' comprehensive development. While traditional training focuses on isolated technical drills, modern methods integrate tactical and gameplay elements.
Objective: This single-case ABCA design study compared the effects of two 4-week training methods - traditional isolated drills and modern integrated gameplay on self-efficacy, tactical awareness, and technical proficiency in elite junior players selected from a high-performance international tennis academy.
Methodology: Three international male junior players, aged 15-17 and ranked within the top 100 in the world, were observed during the pre-intervention, intervention, and follow-up stages, totaling 113 observations. Training methods were delivered 4 times per week by the same professional certified coach with more than 10 years of experience in the ITF and ATP Tours, each tailored to individual player’s needs. Self-efficacy questionnaires were administered before and after each session, and player interviews provided qualitative insights into their technical and tactical improvement. Results: Both methods significantly increased self-efficacy when well-structured and individualized. However, the modern method led to greater tactical and technical improvements in gameplay and self-perception, while traditional drills enhanced stroke consistency.
Discussion: The findings suggest that integrating technical, tactical, physical, and mental training facilitates adaptation to tennis' dynamic contexts, and personalized approaches to maximizing strengths are ideal for junior development.
Conclusion: A balanced approach seems ideal, with modern methodology appearing more beneficial for self-efficacy, and traditional training still has value for specific technical skills.
References
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualita-tive data analysis. International journal of qualitative methods, 22, https://doi.org/10.16094069231183620
Brinkman, C., Baez, S. E., Genoese, F., & Hoch, J. M. (2019). Use of Goal Setting to Enhance Self-Efficacy After Sports-Related Injury: A Critically Appraised Topic. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 29(4), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2019-0032
Budi, D. R., Syafei, M., Kusuma, M. N. H., Suhartoyo, T., Hidayat, R., & Listiandi, A. D. (2020). The signifi-cance of exercise method on forehand and backhand groundstroke skills improvement in ten-nis. Jurnal SPORTIF: Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 6(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v6i1.13920
Buszard, T., Reid, M., Krause, L., Kovalchik, S., & Farrow, D. (2017). Quantifying Contextual Interference and Its Effect on Skill Transfer in Skilled Youth Tennis Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01931
Carvalho, J., Araújo, D., Travassos, B., Esteves, P., Pessanha, L., Pereira, F., & Davids, K. (2013). Dynamics of players' relative positioning during baseline rallies in tennis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(14), 1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.792944
Chrysidis, S., Turner, M. J., & Wood, A. G. (2020). The effects of REBT on irrational beliefs, self-determined motivation, and self-efficacy in American Football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(19), 2215–2224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776924
Colomar, J., Baiget, E., & Corbi, F. (2020). Influence of Strength, Power, and Muscular Stiffness on Stroke Velocity in Junior Tennis Players. Frontiers in Physiology, 11, 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00196
Cordellat Marzal, A., & Valenciano, R. (2022). Estudio descriptivo sobre el uso del auto-habla en tenistas profesionales (Descriptive study on the use of self-talk in professional tennis players). Retos, 45, 996–1001. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.93132
French, D. P., Olander, E. K., Chisholm, A., & Mc Sharry, J. (2014). Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults' self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9593-z
Fuelscher, I. T., Ball, K., & Macmahon, C. (2012). Perspectives on learning styles in motor and sport skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00069
Gimenez-Egido, J. M., Ortega-Toro, E., Palao, J. M., & Torres-Luque, G. (2020). Effect of scaling equip-ment on U-10 players tennis serve during match-play: A nonlinear pedagogical approach. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110011
Gimenez-Egido, J. M., Carvalho, J., Araújo, D., & Ortega-Toro, E. (2023). Perceived self-efficacy by Un-der-10 tennis players when scaling the equipment and play area. Psychology of Sport and Exer-cise, 67, 102407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102407
Grylls, E., Turner, M. J., & Erskine, J. (2021). The challenge of the umpire’s chair: Challenge and threat, self-efficacy, and psychological resilience in Australian tennis officials. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 52(5), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2021.52.381
Harwood, C., & Knight, C. (2009). Stress in youth sport: A developmental investigation of tennis parents. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(4), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.01.005
Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Goltsios, C., & Theodorakis, Y. (2008). Investigating the Functions of Self-Talk: The Effects of Motivational Self-Talk on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Young Tennis Players. The Sport Psychologist, 22(4), 458-471. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.22.4.458
Krause, L., Farrow, D., Pinder, R., Buszard, T., Kovalchik, S., & Reid, M. (2019a). Enhancing skill transfer in tennis using representative learning design. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(22), 2560–2568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1647739
Krause, L., Farrow, D., Buszard, T., Pinder, R., & Reid, M. (2019b). Application of representative learning design for assessment of common practice tasks in tennis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.008
Lane, A. M., Jones, L., & Stevens, M. J. (2002). Coping with failure: The effects of self-esteem and coping on changes in self-efficacy. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25(4), 331. https://search.proquest.com/docview/215873047
Ma, H. H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches: Per-centage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior modification, 30(5), 598-617.
Menayo, R., Sabido, R., Fuentes, J. P., Moreno, F. J., & García, J. A. (2010). Simultaneous Treatment Ef-fects in Learning Four Tennis Shots in Contextual Interference Conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(2), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.2.661-673
Pacheco, W., Nunes, W. J., & da Costa, F. C. (2024). Análise do processo de pensamento e intervenção pedagógica de treinadores de ténis: Desenho e validação do protocolo de uma entrevista. Retos, 54, 591-601. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v54.101275
Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
Penalva, F., Guzmán, J. F., Martínez-Gallego, R., & Crespo, M. (2022). Design and validation of a tennis tool to control on-court technical and tactical training content. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 17(2), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541211027428
Reid, M., Crespo, M., Lay, B., & Berry, J. (2006). Skill acquisition in tennis: Research and current practice. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.011
Reid, M., Giblin, G., & Whiteside, D. (2015). A kinematic comparison of the overhand throw and tennis serve in tennis players: how similar are they really? Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(7), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.962572
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applica-tions. Behavior modification, 22(3), 221-242.
Sindall, P., Lenton, J. P., Mason, B. S., Tolfrey, K., Cooper, R. A., Martin Ginis, K. A., & Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L. (2021). Practice improves court mobility and self-efficacy in tennis-specific wheelchair pro-pulsion. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 16(4), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1761892
Vernon, G., Farrow, D., & Reid, M. (2018). Returning Serve in Tennis: A Qualitative Examination of the Interaction of Anticipatory Information Sources Used by Professional Tennis Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00895
Vives, F., Lázaro, J., Guzmán, J. F., Crespo, M., & Martínez-Gallego, R. (2024). Estrategia de servicio en el tenis profesional de dobles femenino - una perspectiva basada en datos (Serve strategy in pro-fessional women’s doubles tennis - a data-driven perspective). Retos, 60, 955–962. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107972
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco José Penalva Salmerón, Rafael Martínez-Gallego, Miguel Crespo Celda, José Francisco Guzmán Luján

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.