Unnecessary peripheral venous catheters in ambulatory emergency care

Authors

  • S. Ballesteros-Peña Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute. Barakaldo. España. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-6880
  • S. Unanue-Arza Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute. Barakaldo. España
  • M. Juaristi Osakidetza. Hospital de Basurto. Bilbao. España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0998

Keywords:

Catheters, Vascular Access Devices, Ambulatory Care, Emergency Medical Services

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of unnecessary peripheral venous catheter (PVC) cannulation in adult patients attended in Ambulatory Emergency Care, and to analyse potential associated factors.

An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital for two consecutive months. The proportion of canulated and unused PVC was calculated and related to patient variables.

A PVC was cannulated in 701 patients. In 103 cases (14.7%; 95%CI: 12.1-17.3) the catheter was not used, and the patients were discharged directly home. Age over 64 was associated with a higher proportion of unsuitability (19.3% vs. 10.8%; p=0.002).

There seems to be a certain proportion of catheters cannulated unnecessarily in Ambulatory Emergency Care, which would justify the implementation of good practice programmes in the assessment and selection of vascular accesses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

S. Ballesteros-Peña, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute. Barakaldo. España.

(2): Osakidetza. Hospital Santa Marina, Bilbao. España.

(3): Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). España.

 

S. Unanue-Arza, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute. Barakaldo. España

(1): Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo. España.

(3): Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). España.

M. Juaristi, Osakidetza. Hospital de Basurto. Bilbao. España.

(4): Osakidetza. Hospital de Basurto, Bilbao. España.

References

Thomas C, Cabilan CJ, Johnston ANB. Peripheral intravenous cannula insertion and use in a tertiary hospital emergency department: a cross-sectional study. Australas Emerg Care. 2020;23:166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2020.02.001

Fry M, Romero B, Berry A. Utility of peripheral intravenous cannulae inserted in one tertiary referral emergency department: A medical record audit. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016;19:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2015.10.003

Zurro Hernández J, de Santiago-Juárez López JA. Indicadores de calidad. Madrid: Sanidad y Ediciones, 2002.

Ballesteros-Peña S, Vallejo-De la Hoz G, Fernández-Aedo I. Pain scores for intravenous cannulation and arterial blood gas test among emergency department patients. Enferm Clin 2018;28:359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.11.002

Gledstone-Brown L, McHugh D. Idle 'just-in-case' peripheral intravenous cannulas in the emergency department: is something wrong? Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30:309-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12877

Robles-García M, Ceballos B, Rodríguez-Lera MJ, Piedra L, Sánchez-Ortiz S, Botero K. Factores asociados a la adecuación de la utilización de vías venosas en el servicio de urgencias. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2004;19:83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1134-282X(04)77676-9

Ramos Sánchez MR, Fernández Núñez JM, Fernández García MT, Gómez-Valadés Casado AM, Caballero Paredes MI, Sánchez Sánchez MJ. Adecuación de la vía venosa periférica en un servicio de urgencias. Emergencias 2006;18:326-32.

Evison H, Sweeny A, Ranse J, Carrington M, Marsh N, Byrnes J, et al. Idle peripheral intravenous cannulation: an observational cohort study of pre-hospital and emergency department practices. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00941-y

Kelly AM, Egerton-Warburton D. When is peripheral intravenous catheter insertion indicated in the emergency department? Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:515-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12282

Lim ZJ, Nagle D, McAllan F, Ramanan R, Dendle C, Stuart RL, Egerton-Warburton D. Evaluating the sustained effectiveness of a multimodal intervention aimed at influencing PIVC insertion practices in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2020;37:444-449. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208852

Hawkins T, Greenslade JH, Suna J, Williams J, Rickard CM, Jensen M, et al. Peripheral Intravenous Cannula Insertion and Use in the Emergency Department: An Intervention Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13335

Egerton-Warburton D, McAllan F, Ramanan R, Lim ZJ, Nagle D, Dendle C, et al. Human factor-designed multimodal intervention reduces the rate of unused peripheral intravenous cannula insertion. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31:372-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13165

Published

2022-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Ballesteros-Peña S, Unanue-Arza S, Juaristi M. Unnecessary peripheral venous catheters in ambulatory emergency care. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 29 [cited 2025 Dec. 19];45(2):e0998. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/92786

Issue

Section

Short articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.