Opinions of healthcare professionals on the definition of severe mental illness: a qualitative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0339Keywords:
Severe mental illness. Qualitative research. Community health services.Abstract
Background. Over the years, a number of definitions of severe mental illness (SMI) have been proposed and substantial controversy about the definition still remains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the views of a group of mental health professionals on the appropriate criteria for defining SMI.
Methodology. This was a qualitative study, based on five focus groups with mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, general practitioners, monitors and social workers) from Carlos Haya Hospital in Malaga, Spain. A content analysis was performed on the transcriptions by three independent researchers.
Results. The professionals agreed that a certain degree of dysfunctionality must be present for a definition of SMI. There was some disagreement between the different categories of professionals regarding the inclusion of dimensions such as diagnosis, family and social support, use of healthcare resources and duration of the illness as necessary and sufficient criteria for the definition of SMI. From the professionals’ discourse, some personal patient variables such as age of onset of illness, lack of insight and level of education emerged as relevant for the definition of SMI.
Conclusions. Apart from the dimensions considered in the literature, the interviewed mental health professionals discussed other criteria that could be taken into account in the definition of SMI. Perceptions differ between categories of professional and work settings in which they operate.Downloads
References
1. GOLDMAN HH, GATTOZZI AA, TAUBE CC. Defining and counting the chronically mentally ill. Hos Community Psychiatry 1981; 32: 21-27.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.32.1.21
2. National Institute of Mental Health. Towards a model for a comprehensive community based mental health system. Washington DC: NIMH; 1987.
3. SCHINNAR AP, ROTHBARD AB, KANTER R, JUNG YS. An empirical literature review of definitions of severe and persistent mental illness. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 1602-1608.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.147.12.1602
4. SLADE M, POWELL R, STRATHDEE G. Current aprochates to identifying the severely mentally ill. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1997; 32: 177-184.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00788236
5. RUGGERI M, LEESE M, THORNICROFT G, BISOFFI G, TANSELLA M. Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 149-155.
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.2.149
6. LORA A, BEZZI R, ERLICHER A. Estimating the prevalence of severe mental illness in mental health services in Lombardy (Italy). Community Ment Health J 2007; 43: 341-357.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-006-9078-z
7. GISBERT C (COORD.). Rehabilitación psicosocial y tratamiento integral del trastorno mental severo. Madrid: Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría. Colección Estudios; 2003.
8. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Grupo de Trabajo de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de Intervenciones Psicosociales en el Trastorno Mental Grave. Guía de Práctica Clínica de Intervenciones Psicosociales en el Trastorno Mental Grave. Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud-I+CS; Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS: I+CS Nº 2007/05, 2009.
9. Consejería de Salud. Proceso Asistencial Integrado del Trastorno Mental Grave. Sevilla, 2008.
10. KITZINGER J. Qualitative research: introducing focus group. BMJ 1995; 311: 299-302.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
11. BARBOUR RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005; 39: 742-750.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02200.x
12. VALLES M. El reto de la calidad en la investigación social cualitativa: de la retórica a los planteamientos de fondo y las propuestas técnicas. Rev Esp Invest Sociol 2005; 110: 91-114.
https://doi.org/10.2307/40184684
13. MORENO KÜSTNER B, MAYORAL F, RIVAS F, ANGONA P, REQUENA J, GARCÍA-HERRERA JM et al. Factors associated with use of community mental health services by schizophrenia patients, using multilevel analysis. BMC Health service 2001; 11: 257.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-257
14. MEADOWS LM, MORSE JM. Constructing evidence within the qualitative Project. En: Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ (Eds.). The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986236.n8
15. PARABIAGHI A, BONETTO C, RUGGERI M, LASALVIA A, LEESE M. Severe and persistent mental illness: a useful definition for prioritizing community-based mental health service interventions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006; 41: 457-63.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0048-0
16. GISBERT C (Ed.). Rehabilitación psicosocial del trastorno mental severo: situación actual y recomendaciones. Madrid: Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, Cuadernos Técnicos, 6; 2002.
17. PÉREZ ANDRÉS C. Sobre la metodología cualitativa. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2002; 76: 373-380.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272002000500001
18. GUEST G, BUNCE A , JOHNSON L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006; 18: 59-82.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
19. BALSERA GÓMEZ J, RODRÍGUEZ MEDINA C, CABA CALVET R, VEGA PRADA R, RUIZ UREÑA H, BERRUECO ORTIZ L et al. La implantación y evaluación del modelo de gestión de casos (case management) en Cataluña: El programa PSI-TMS. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2002; 30: 350-357.
20. BRUGOS A, ARBELOA B, ASTRAIN MV, LÓPEZ S, OTERO M, MONREAL C et al. Valoración del programa social de atención personas con trastorno mental grave: un estudio Delphi. An Sist Sanit Navarra 2007; 30: 101-112.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
