Escalas para predicción de resultados tras traumatismo grave
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.001Palabras clave:
escalas en trauma, predicción de resultado, TRISS, ISS, NISS, RISC II, RTS, GAP.Resumen
Resumen: En este artículo se ha hecho una revisión sobre el desarrollo de las escalas más utilizadas en los pacientes con traumatismo grave desde hace 40 años. Es sabido que, las escalas anatómicas son eficaces, tanto para medir la severidad de las lesiones, como para predecir resultados. Las escalas fisiológicas miden el componente dinámico tras el trauma, con gran influencia en el pronóstico de los traumatizados. Los índices metabólicos, tanto lactato como el déficit de base, son reflejo de un estado de hipoperfusión tisular, y por tanto de shock. Las escalas combinadas sirven para la predicción y comparación evaluativa de los resultados. La incorporación de factores que influyen en el pronóstico de los traumatizados ha conllevado al desarrollo de nuevas escalas. Sin embargo, carecen de estudios de validación externa para su uso generalizado. Hasta que estos estudios se lleven a cabo, estas escalas deben usarse con precaución.
Descargas
Citas
FISHER A, ROSS C, HENDERSON C, KIRK S, FEROZE M, RICHMOND R. Major trauma care in England. London: National Audit Office. 2010.
Disponible en: http://healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/visualizations/regional.
OESTERN HJ, REGEL G. Clinical care of the polytrauma patient. In: Tscherene H, Regel G, eds. Polytrauma Management. New York: Springer 1997: 225-238.
BAKER SP, O’NEILL B, HADDON W, LONG WB. The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187-196.
CHAMPION HR, SACCO WJ, CARNAZZO AJ, COPES W, FOUTY WJ. Trauma score. Crit Care Med 1981; 9: 672-676.
BELZUNEGUI T, ALI B. Escalas para el pronóstico del paciente con traumatismo grave. Emergencias 2015; 27: 355-356.
GRADIN C, BELZUNEGUI T, BERMEJO B, TEIJEIRA R, FORTÚN M, REYERO D. Cambios durante la última década en la incidencia y las características de los pacientes politraumatizados en Navarra. Emergencias 2015; 27: 174-180.
OSLER T, BAKER SP, LONG W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 1997; 43: 922-925.
LEFERING R. Trauma score systems for quality assessment. Eur J Trauma 2002; 28: 52-63.
LEFERING R. Trauma scoring systems. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18: 637-640.
CREAMER GL, CIVIL I, KOELMEYER T, ADAMS D, CACALA S, THOMPSON J. Population-based study of age, gender and causes of severe injury in Auckland, 2004. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 995-998.
CHAMPION HR, SACCO WJ, LEPPER RL, AT-ZINGER EM, COPES WS, PRALL RH. An anatomic index of injury severity. J Trauma 1980; 20: 97.
HEALEY C, OSLER TM, ROGERS FB, HEALEY M, GLANCE LG, KILGO PD et al. Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 2003; 54: 671-680.
CHAMPION HR, COPES WS, SACCO WJ, LAWNICK MM, KEAST SL, BAIN LW et al. The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma 1990; 30: 1356-1365.
REHN M, PEREL P, BLACKHALL K, LOSSIUS HM. Prognostic models for the early care of trauma patients: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011; 19: 17.
ORNATO J, MLINEK EJ, CRAREN EJ, NELSON N. Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centers. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14: 1061-1064.
LAVOIE A, EMOND M, MOORE L, CAMDEN S, LIBERMAN M. Evaluation of the Prehospital Index, presence of high-velocity impact and judgment of emergency medical technicians as criteria for trauma triage. CJEM 2010; 12: 111-118.
KNAUS WA, WAGNER DP, DRAPER EA, ZIMMERMAN JE, BERGNER M, BASTOS PG et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619-1636.
BOUAMRA O, WROTCHFORD A, HOLLIS S, VAIL A, WOODFORD M, LECKY F. A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model. J Trauma 2006, 61: 701-710.
HANNAN E, MENDELOFF J, FARRELL LS, CAYTEN CG, MURPHY JG. Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1995; 38: 83-88.
KIM Y, JUNG KY, KIM CY, KIM YI, SHIN Y. Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS). J Trauma 2000; 48: 280-285.
AL WEST T, RIVARA FP, CUMMINGS P, JURKOVICH GJ, MAIER RV. Harborview assessment for risk of mortality: an improved measure of injury severity on the basis of ICD-9-CM. J Trauma 2000; 49: 530-541.
LEFERING R, HUBER-WAGNER S, NIENABER U, MAEGELE M, BOUILLON B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGUTM: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II. Crit Care 2014; 18: 476.
LEFERING R. Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2009; 5: 437-447.
KROEZEN F, BIJLSMA TS, LIEM MS, MEEUWIS JD, LEENEN LP. Base deficit-based predictive modeling of outcome in trauma patients admitted to intensive care units in Dutch trauma centers. J Trauma 2007; 63: 908-913.
SARTORIUS D, LE MANACH Y, DAVID JS, RANCUREL E, SMAIL N, THICOÏPÉ M et al. Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): A new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 831-837.
KONDO Y, ABE T, KOHSHI K, TOKUDA Y, COOK EF, KUKITA I. Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score. Crit Care 2011; 15: R191.
HARWOOD PJ, GIANNOUDIS PV, PROBST C, VAN GRIENSVEN M, KRETTEK C, PAPE HC. Which AIS based scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic blunt trauma patients? J Trauma 2006; 60: 334-340.
HASLER RM, MEALING N, ROTHEN HU, COSLOVSKY M, LECKY F, JUNI P. Validation and reclassification of MGAP and GAP in hospital settings using data from the Trauma Audit and Research Network. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77: 757-763.
AHUN E, KÖKSAL Ö, SIĞIRLI D, TORUN G, DÖNMEZ SS, ARMAĞAN E. Value of the Glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure score for predicting the mortality of major trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 2014; 20: 241.
QUIRÓS AM, PÉREZ AB, FERNÁNDEZ AP, PERILLA PP, NÚÑEZ MAR, VIRTO AMM et al. Mortalidad en el traumatismo potencialmente grave atendido en un servicio de urgencias de tercer nivel: Evaluación de la escala pronóstico de mortalidad GAP. Emergencias 2015; 27: 371-374.
SCHLUTER PJ, NATHENS A, NEAL ML, GOBLE S, CAMERON CM, DAVEY TM et al. Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma - Injury Infect Crit Care 2010; 68: 761-770.
EID HO, ABU-ZIDAN FM. New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score. World J Surg 2015; 39: 165-171.
LAVOIE A, MOORE L, LESAGE N, LIBERMAN M, SAMPALIS JS. The New Injury Severity Score: a more accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality than the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 2004; 56: 1312-1320.
DUNNE JR, TRACY JK, SCALEA TM, NAPOLITANO LM. Lactate and base deficit in trauma: does alcohol or drug use impair their predictive accuracy? J Trauma 2005; 58: 959-966.
LEVRAUT J, CIEBIERA JP, CHAVE S, RABARY O, JAMBOU P, CARLES M et al. Mild hyperlactatemia in stable septic patients is due to impaired lactate clearance rather than overproduction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1021-1026.
BLOW O, MAGLIORE L, CLARIDGE JA, BUTLER K, YOUNG JS. The golden hour and the silver day: detection and correction of occult hypoperfusion within 24 hours improves outcome from major trauma. J Trauma 1999; 47: 964-969.
MORRIS JA JR, MACKENZIE EJ, EDELSTEIN SL. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. JAMA 1990; 263: 1942-1946.
CHAWDA M, HILDEBRAND F, PAPE H, GIANNOUDIS P. Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system? Injury 2004; 35: 347-358.
PAL JD, VICTORINO GP, TWOMEY P, LIU TH, BULLARD MK, HARKEN AH. Admission serum lactate levels do not predict mortality in the acutely injured patient. J Trauma 2006; 60: 583-587.
DAVIS JW, PARKS SN, KAUPS KL, GLADEN HD, O´DONELL-NICOL S. Admission base deficit predicts transfusion requeriments and risk of complicacions. J Trauma 1996; 41: 769-774.
BELZUNEGUI T, GRADÍN C, FORTÚN M, CABODEVILLA A, BARBACHANO A, SANZ JA. Major trauma registry of Navarre (Spain): the accuracy of different survival prediction models. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31: 1382-1388.
O’REILLY GM, JOLLEY DJ, CAMERON PA, GABBE B. Missing in action: a case study of the application of methods for dealing with missing data to trauma system benchmarking. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17: 1122-1129.
HOFFMANN M, LEHMANN W, RUEGER JM, LEFERING R. Introduction of a novel trauma score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73: 1605-1611.
ALTMAN DG, ROYSTON P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in medicine 2000; 19: 453-473.
OSLER T, RUTLEDGE R, DEIS J, BEDRICK E. ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma 1996; 41: 380-388.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
