Comparación de la escala RACE con otras escalas de valoración de oclusiones arteriales de gran vaso en el medio extrahospitalario: una revisión rápida

Autores/as

  • L. Senovilla-González Centro de Salud Parquesol. Valladolid. España.
  • Á. Hernández-Ruiz Área de Desarrollo de Proyectos Científicos. Fundación Iberoamericana de Nutrición (FINUT). Granada. España.
  • M. García-García Servicio de Emergencias Sanitarias de SACYL. Valladolid. España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0964

Palabras clave:

Enfermedad cerebrovascular, Escalas, Precisión diagnóstica, Vasos sanguíneos, Servicios médicos de urgencia

Resumen

Una proporción significativa de las enfermedades cerebrovasculares isquémicas se deben a oclusiones arteriales de grandes vasos (OAGV). Algunos servicios de emergencias emplean escalas para detectar OAGV y determinar tanto el tratamiento como el centro médico más adecuados para el paciente. El objetivo de esta revisión fue comparar el valor predictivo para reconocer la presencia de una OAGV con la escala RACE frente a otras escalas destinadas al ámbito extrahospitalario.

Se realizó una revisión rápida aplicando la metodología PRISMA en PubMed. Se seleccionaron veinte artículos enfocados en el entorno prehospitalario. Los instrumentos evaluados con mayor frecuencia fueron NIHSS, CPSSS, LAMS y RACE. Las escalas evaluadas demostraron una precisión adecuada en la identificación de dicho evento, sin pretender reemplazar las pruebas por imagen. RACE mostró un rendimiento predictivo comparable al resto de escalas, aunque inferior a la escala hospitalaria NIHSS, por lo que puede ser un instrumento útil a nivel extrahospitalario.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

L. Senovilla-González , Centro de Salud Parquesol. Valladolid. España.

Departamento de Enfermería. Universidad de Valladolid. Valladolid. España.

M. García-García , Servicio de Emergencias Sanitarias de SACYL. Valladolid. España.

Departamento de Enfermería. Universidad de Valladolid. Valladolid. España.

Citas

Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Gobierno de España. Estrategia en Ictus del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, 2008; 160. http://www.semg.es/doc/documentos_SEMG/estrategias_ictus_SNS.pdf

Sociedad Española de Neurología. El 90% de los casos de ictus se podrían evitar con una adecuada prevención de los factores de riesgo y un estilo de vida saludable. 2017: https://www.sen.es/saladeprensa/pdf/Link223.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Defunciones según la causa de muerte. España. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=7947#!tabs-grafico

Gerencia de Emergencias Sanitarias de Castilla y León. Urgencias neurológicas: actuación en el ictus. SACYL, 2012; 1-3. https://tiempoescerebro.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/p-27.pdf

Grupo de Trabajo de la Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Manejo de Pacientes con Ictus en Atención Primaria. Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de pacientes con ictus en atención primaria. Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnología Sanitarias de la Agencia Laín Entralgo de la Comunidad de Madrid; 2009. Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS: UETS Nº 2007/5-2. https://smgg.es/images/articulos/ictusatencionprimaria.pdf

MARTÍNEZ BARANDALLA C, CIGA LOZANO MA. Ictus: incidencia, factores de riesgo y repercusión. Trabajo Fin de Grado. Facultad de Enfermería. Universidad Pública de Navarra. Pamplona; 2014. http://academica-e.unavarra.es/bitstream/handle/2454/16253/TFG_Cristina_Martinez_Barandalla.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

RENNERT RC, WALI AR, STEINBERG JA, SANTIAGO-DIEPPA DR, OLSON SE, PANNELL JS et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and clinical presentation of large vessel ischemic stroke. Clin Neurosurg 2019; 85: S4-S8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz042

USTRELL-ROIG X, SERENA-LEAL J. Ictus. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las enfermedades cerebrovasculares. Rev Esp Cardiol 2007; 60: 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1157/13108281

RAI AT, SELDON AE, BOO S, LINK PS, DOMICO JR, TARABISHY AR, LUCKE-WOLD N, CARPENTER JS. A population-based incidence of acute large vessel occlusions and thrombectomy eligible patients indicates significant potential for growth of endovascular stroke therapy in the USA. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 722-726. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012515

BHATIA R, HILL MD, SHOBHA N, MENON B, BAL S, KOCHAR P et al. Low rates of acute recanalization with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke: real-world experience and a call for action. Stroke 2010; 41: 2254-2258. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592535

BRAY JE, MARTIN J, COOPER G, BARGER B, BERNARD S, BLADIN C. Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 28-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1159/000086201

LLANES JN, KIDWELL CS, STARKMAN S, LEARY MC, ECKSTEIN M, SAVER JL. The Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS): a new measure to characterize stroke severity in the field. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004 8: 46-50. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/312703002806

PÉREZ N, CARRERA D, GORCHS M, QUEROL M, MILLÁN M, COMIS M et al. Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke 2013; 45: 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003071

GARRITTY C, GARTLEHNER G, KAMEL C, KING VJ, NUSSBAUMER-STREIT B, STEVENS A et al. Cochrane Rapid Reviews. Interim Guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. March 2020. https://methods.cochrane.org/rapidreviews/sites/methods.cochrane.org.rapidreviews/files/public/uploads/cochrane_rr_-_guidance-23mar2020-final.pdf

World Health Organization, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017. http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/rapid-review-guide/en/

MOHER D, LIBERATI A, TETZLAFF J, ALTMAN DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

KHANGURA S, KONNYU K, CUSHMAN R GRIMSHAW J, MOHERET D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

SCHÜNEMANN HJ, MOJA L. Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! and systematic. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-4

HAMEL C, MICHAUD A, THUKU M, SKIDMORE B, STEVENS A, NUSSBAUMER-STREIT B et al. Defining rapid reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 129: 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041

VANACKER P, HELDNER MR, AMIGUET M, FAOUZI M, CRAS P, NTAIOS G et al. Prediction of large vessel occlusions in acute stroke: National institute of health stroke scale is hard to beat. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: e336-e343. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001630

LIMA FO, SILVA GS, FURIE KL, FRANKEL MR, LEV MH, CAMARGO ÉC et al. Field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination. a simple and accurate prehospital scale to detect large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke 2016; 47: 1997-2002. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301

RICHARDS CT, HUEBINGER R, TATARIS KL, WEBER JM, EGGERS L, MARKUL E et al. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale can identify large vessel occlusion stroke. Prehosp Emerg Care 2018; 22: 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2017.1387629

SUZUKI K, NAKAJIMA N, KUNIMOTO K, HATAKE S, SAKAMOTO Y, HOKAMA H et al. Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Screen is an ideal prehospital scale to avoid missing endovascular therapy in acute stroke. Stroke 2018; 49: 2096-2101. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022107

CARRERA D, GORCHS M, QUEROL M, ABILLEIRA S, RIBÓ M, MILLÁN M et al. Revalidation of the RACE scale after its regional implementation in Catalonia: a triage tool for large vessel occlusion. J Neurointerv Sug 2019; 11: 751-756. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014519

JUMAA MA, CASTONGUAY AC, SALAHUDDIN H, SHAWVER J, SAJU L, BURGESS R et al. Long-term implementation of a prehospital severity scale for EMS triage of acute stroke: A real-world experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 12: 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014997

TELEB MS, HAGE AV, CARTER J, JAYARAMAN MV, MCTAGGART RA. Stroke vision, aphasia, neglect (VAN) assessment - A novel emergent large vessel occlusion screening tool : pilot study and comparison with current clinical severity indices. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012131

PURRUCKER JC, HÄRTIG F, RICHTER H, ENGELBRECHT A, HARTMANN J, AUER J et al. Design and validation of a clinical scale for prehospital stroke recognition , severity grading and prediction of large vessel occlusion : the shortened NIH Stroke Scale for emergency medical services. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016893

VIDALE S, ARNABOLDI M, FRANGI L, LONGONI M, MONZA G, AGOSTONI E. The large artery intracranial occlusion stroke scale: A new tool with high accuracy in predicting large vessel occlusion. Front Neurol 2019; 10, 130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00130

ANDSBERG G, ESBJÖRNSSON M, OLOFSSON A, LINDGREN A, NORRVING B, EULER MV. PreHospital Ambulance Stroke Test - pilot study of a novel stroke test. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017; 25: 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0377-x

VÁCLAVÍK D, ČÁBAL M, BAR M, KLEČKA L, HOLEŠ D, MIKULÍK R. Prehospital stroke scale ( FAST PLUS Test ) predicts patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. Brain Behav 2018; 8: e01087. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1087

KUMMER BR, GIALDINI G, SEVUSH JL, KAMEL H, PATSALIDES A, NAVI BB. External validation of the Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 1270-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.02.015

NAZLIEL B, STARKMAN S, LIEBESKIND DS, OVBIAGELE B, KIM D, SANOSSIAN N et al. A brief prehospital stroke severity scale identifies ischemic stroke patients harboring persisting large arterial occlusions. Stroke 2008; 39: 2264-2267. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508127

KATZ BS, MCMULLAN JT, SUCHAREW H, ADEOYE O, BRODERICK JP. Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale. Stroke 2015; 46: 1508-1512. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008804

NOORIAN AR, SANOSSIAN N, SHKIRKOVA K, LIEBESKIND DS, ECKSTEIN M, STRATTON SJ et al. Los Angeles motor scale to identify large vessel occlusion: prehospital validation and comparison with other screens. Stroke 2018; 49: 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019228

SINGER OC, DVORAK F, ROCHEMONT MR, LANFERMANN H, SITZER M, NEUMANN-HAEFELIN T. A simple 3-item stroke scale. Comparison with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and prediction of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2005; 36: 773-776. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000157591.61322.df

HASTRUP S, DAMGAARD D, JOHNSEN SP, ANDERSEN G. Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale to predict large artery occlusion: design and comparison with other scales. Stroke 2016; 47: 1772-1776. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012482

ZHAO H, PESAVENTO L, COOTE S, RODRIGUES E, SALVARIS P, SMITH K et al. Ambulance clinical triage for acute stroke treatment. Paramedic triage algorithm for large vessel occlusion. Stroke 2018; 49: 945-951. https://doi.org/ 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019307

COORAY C, FEKETE K, MIKULIK R, LEES KR, WAHLGREN N, AHMED N. Threshold for NIH stroke scale in predicting vessel occlusion and functional outcome after stroke thrombolysis. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 822-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12451

SCHEITZ JF, ABDUL-RAHIM AH, MACLSAAC RL, COORAY C, SUCHAREW H, KLEINDORFER D et al. Clinical selection strategies to identify ischemic stroke patients with large anterior vessel occlusion: results from SITS-ISTR (safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke international stroke thrombolysis registry). Stroke 2017; 48: 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014431

SMITH EE, KENT DM, BULSARA KR, LEUNG LY, LICHTMAN JH, REEVES MJ et al. Accuracy of prediction instruments for diagnosing large vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018; 49: e111-e122. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000160

TURC G, MAÏER B, NAGGARA O, SENERS P, ISABEL C, TISSERAND M et al. Clinical Scales Do Not Reliably identify acute ischemic stroke patients with large-artery occlusion. Stroke 2016; 47: 1466-1472. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144

REQUENA M, PÉREZ N, ABILLEIRA S, CARDONA P, URRA X, MARTÍ-FABREGAS J et al. Predictors of endovascular treatment among stroke codes activated within 6 hours from symptom onset. Stroke 2018; 49: 2116-2121. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021316

SCHLEMM L, SCHLEMM E. Clinical benefit of improved Prehospital stroke scales to detect stroke patients with large vessel occlusions: results from a conditional probabilistic model. BMC Neurol 2018; 18: 16. doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1021-8

LAWNER BJ, SZABO K, DALY J, FOSTER K, MCCOY P, POLINER D et al. Challenges related to the implementation of an EMS-administered, large vessel occlusion stroke score. West J Emerg Med 2019; 21: 441-448. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.9.43127

CARRERA D, CAMPBELL CVB, CORTÉS J, GORCHS M, QUEROL M, JIMÉNEZ X et al. Predictive value of modifications of the prehospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale for large vessel occlusion in patients with acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 26: 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.032

Descargas

Publicado

2021-08-20

Cómo citar

Senovilla-González, L., Hernández-Ruiz, Á., & García-García, M. (2021). Comparación de la escala RACE con otras escalas de valoración de oclusiones arteriales de gran vaso en el medio extrahospitalario: una revisión rápida. Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra, 44(2), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0964