Aprendizaje combinado y aprendizaje en línea con aprendizaje basado en proyectos: ¿Afectan a la cogni-ción y al rendimiento del aprendizaje psicomotor en condiciones físicas? (Blended learning and online learning with project-based learning: Do they affect cognition and psycho-motor learning achievement in physical conditions?)

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.99965

Palabras clave:

Blended Learning, Integrated Curriculum, Psychomotor Learning

Resumen

Antecedentes y objetivo del estudio. El aprendizaje en línea sólo está disponible de forma limitada a través del grupo de WhatsApp. La aplicación del grupo WhatsApp se utiliza para proporcionar material de aprendizaje que a menudo se ofrece en forma de películas obtenidas de YouTube, explicaciones muy breves y tareas. Por lo tanto, es necesario prestar especial atención al considerar los métodos de aprendizaje en línea para poder alcanzar los objetivos de aprendizaje. Este estudio pretende determinar el efecto del aprendizaje combinado y del aprendizaje basado en proyectos sobre las capacidades cognitivas y psicomotoras de los estudiantes de la Universidad Estatal de Padang. Material y métodos. Este estudio utiliza un enfoque cuantitativo. Esta investigación se llevó a cabo en la Universidad Estatal de Padang con estudiantes de tercer semestre matriculados en el curso de condición física 2022. Se utilizó como muestra un total de 80 estudiantes del tercer semestre del curso de condición física de 2022. Los datos sobre los resultados del aprendizaje y los logros del aprendizaje psicomotor se obtuvieron utilizando una hoja de observación de habilidades de e-test en forma de aprendizaje por videoconferencia. Las técnicas de análisis de datos en este estudio se asistieron mediante el uso de la aplicación SPSS. Resultados. Los resultados de aprendizaje cognitivo de los alumnos a los que se les enseña con el modelo de aprendizaje basado en proyectos alcanzan una media de 72,3. Esta media es superior a la media de los alumnos que estudiaron con el modelo de aprendizaje semipresencial (BL), a saber, 63,5. Los alumnos a los que se enseñó con el modelo de aprendizaje basado en proyectos (PjBL) tuvieron un resultado medio de aprendizaje psicomotor de 81,3 mayor que los alumnos a los que se enseñó con el modelo semipresencial, que tuvieron una media de 76,3. Conclusiones. Los resultados muestran que el aprendizaje combinado y los modelos de aprendizaje en línea con aprendizaje basado en proyectos tienen un impacto importante en los resultados cognitivos y psicomotores en los logros de aprendizaje en entornos físicos. Es importante analizar otras variables que afectan al progreso de los estudiantes en el aprendizaje cognitivo y psicomotor.

Palabras clave: Aprendizaje Combinado, Aprendizaje basado en proyectos, Aprendizaje Psicomotor

Abstract. Background and the Aim of the Study. Online learning is only available in a limited capacity via the WhatsApp group. The WhatsApp group application is used to provide learning material which is often offered in the form of films obtained from YouTube, very brief explanations, and assignments. Therefore, special attention is needed in considering online learning methods so that learning objectives can be achieved. This study aims to determine the effect of blended learning and project-based learning on the cognitive and psychomotor capacities of Padang State University students. Material and Methods. This study uses a quantitative approach. This research was conducted at Padang State University with third-semester students enrolled in the 2022 physical condition course. A total of 80 students in the third semester of the physical condition course in 2022 were used as a sample. Data on learning outcomes and psychomotor learning achievements were obtained using an observation sheet of e-test skills in the form of video conferencing learning. Data analysis techniques in this study were assisted by using the SPSS application. Results. Cognitive learning outcomes of students who are taught with the project-based learning model reach an average of 72.3. This average is greater than the average of students studying the blended learning (BL) model, namely 63.5. Students who were taught using the project-based learning (PjBL) model had an average psychomotor learning result of 81.3 greater than students who were taught with the blended learning model which had an average of 76.3. Conclusions. The results show that blended learning and online learning models with project-based learning have a major impact on cognitive and psychomotor outcomes in learning achievements under physical settings. Testing the model on variables other than physical health can be used for additional study, and it is important to look at other variables that affect students' progress in cognitive and psychomotor learning.

Keywords:  Blended Learning, Project-Based Learning, Psychomotor Learning

Biografía del autor/a

Pringgo Mardesia, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia.

Department: Department of Sports Coaching

Afiliasi: Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia.

 

Citas

Alam, A. (2022). Platform Utilising Blockchain Technology for eLearning and Online Education for Open Sharing of Academic Proficiency and Progress Records. In Smart Data Intelligence (pp. 307–320.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3311-0_26

Almaududi Ausat, A. M. (2022). Positive impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the world of education. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v23i2.3048.2022

Anthony Jnr, B. (2022). An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3107–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10705-x

Aziz, I., Okilanda, A., Permadi, A. A., Tjahyanto, T., Prabowo, T. A., Rozi, M. F., … Suryadi, D. (2023). Correlational study: Sports Students’ special test results and basic athletic training learning outcomes. Retos, 49, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.98820

Azzahra, S., Maryanti, R., & Wulandary, V. (2022). Problems Faced by Elementary School Students in the Online Learning Process during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of …, 2(2), 245–256.

Balasubramani, M. S., Aamer, N., & Sonawane, S. R. (2022). Cognitive psychology and student-centered pedagogy for students creativity: An analytical study. In Technology Enabled Ergonomic Design (pp. 97–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6982-8_10

Bellas, F., Guerreiro-Santalla, S., Naya, M., & Duro, R. J. (2022). AI Curriculum for European High Schools: An Embedded Intelligence Approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00315-0

Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w

Chen, C. C., Chen, H. R., & Wang, T. Y. (2022). Creative Situated Augmented Reality Learning for Astronomy Curricula. Educational Technology and Society, 25(2), 148–162.

Dautbašić, A., & Bećirović, S. (2022). Teacher and Student Experiences in Online Classes During COVID-19 Pandemic in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. MAP Social Sciences, ArXiv, 2202.07457. https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2454.2022.2.1.9

DeCoito, I., & Briona, L. K. (2023). Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset Through Project-Based Learning and Digital Technologies in STEM Teacher Education. In Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education (pp. 195–222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_9

Eisele, G., Vachon, H., Lafit, G., Kuppens, P., Houben, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W. (2022). The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment, 29(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120957102

Enoch, L. C., Abraham, R. M., & Singaram, V. S. (2022). A comparative analysis of the impact of online, blended, and face-to-face learning on medical students’ clinical competency in the affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03777-x

Escobar, A., Rojas-Gualdrón, D. F., Velez, L. F., & Santos-Pinto, L. (2022). Developing diagnostic skills from preclinical dental education: Caries detection and assessment using e-learning assisted practice. Journal of Dental Education, 86(10), 1382–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12936

Fayazmilani, R., Abbasi, A., Hovanloo, F., & Rostami, S. (2022). The effect of TRX and bodyweight training on physical fitness and body composition in prepubescent soccer athletes. Sport Sciences for Health, 18(4), 1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00908-1

Fernández-Souto, A.-B., Rivera, I. P., & Rúas-Araújo, J. (2023). Gabinetes de comunicación de las federaciones deportivas españolas: estructura, prácticas y afección del COVID-19. Retos, 49, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.9681

Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Active Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 1–21). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96498

Gabbett, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2009). Game-Based Training for Improving Skill and Physical Fitness in Team Sport Athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795409788549553

Grecu, A. L., Hadjar, A., & Simoes Loureiro, K. (2022). The Role of Teaching Styles in the Development of School Alienation and Behavioral Consequences: A Mixed Methods Study of Luxembourgish Primary Schools. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221105476. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221105477

Greenland, S. J., & Moore, C. (2022). Large qualitative sample and thematic analysis to redefine student dropout and retention strategy in open online education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13173

Hardinata, R., Yosika, G. F., Haïdara, Y., Perdana, R. P., Gustian, U., Suryadi, D., … Abidin, M. Z. (2023). Project Based Learning Model: Can It Improve Dribbling Skills In Soccer Games? Indonesian Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.52188/ijpess.v3i1.387

He, P., Chen, I. C., Touitou, I., Bartz, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2022). Predicting student science achievement using post-unit assessment performances in a coherent high school chemistry project-based learning system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 724–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21815

Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., & Pérez-Pueyo, Á. (2021). Physical Education in the COVID-19 context. A tale from teachers of different educationalstages. Retos, 41, 764–774. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v41i0.86368

Huh, D., Li, X., Zhou, Z., Walters, S. T., Baldwin, S. A., Tan, Z., … Mun, E. Y. (2022). A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Meta-analytic Mediation Analysis Using Individual Participant Data: Testing Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Mediator of Brief Motivational Intervention Effects on Alcohol-Related Problems. Prevention Science, 23(3), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01318-4

Ince, F. (2022). Digital Literacy Training: Opportunities and challenges. In Handbook of Research on the Role of Libraries, Archives, and Museums in Achieving Civic Engagement and Social Justice in Smart Cities (pp. 85–199). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8363-0.ch009

Kamoga, S., & Varea, V. (2022). ‘Let them do PE!’The ‘becoming’of Swedish physical education in the age of COVID-19. European Physical Education Review, 28(1), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211036574

Kashapov, R. I., & Kashapov, R. R. (2022). Training influence on endurance of athletes under hypoxia. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2022.2031587

Kaye, L. K., Rousaki, A., Joyner, L. C., Barrett, L. A. F., & Orchard, L. J. (2022). The Online Behaviour Taxonomy: A conceptual framework to understand behaviour in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107443

Knight, G., Chidlow, A., & Minbaeva, D. (2022). Methodological fit for empirical research in international business: A contingency framework. Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 53(1). 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00476-5

Köhler, T., Smith, A., & Bhakoo, V. (2022). Templates in Qualitative Research Methods: Origins, Limitations, and New Directions. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211060710

Le, V. T., Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System, 105, 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102755

Lei, B., Liang, E., Yang, M., Yang, P., Zhou, F., Tan, E. L., … Wang, S. (2022). Predicting clinical scores for Alzheimer’s disease based on joint and deep learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 187, 115966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115966

Lira Camargo, J., Soto Soto, L., Lira Camargo, Z. R., Mujica Ruiz, O., Lira Camargo, L. G., & Campos Miranda, M. E. (2022). Step-by-Step Implementation of a Non-face-to-face Audit Using the Tools of the Cloud. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_27

Martins, J., Honório, S., & Cardoso, J. (2023). Physical fitness levels in students with and without training capacities – A comparative study in physical education classes. Retos, 47, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.94656

Mérida, R. V., Palma-Leon, P., Arias-Arias, C. G., & Calvo-Lluch, A. (2023). Estudio de caso comparativo de gasto calórico de dos actividades de fitness: Cinta Dance® y carrera continua (A comparative case study of caloric expenditure of two fitness activities: Cinta Dance® and continuous running). Retos, 48, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v48.97075

Mielikäinen, M. (2022). Towards blended learning: Stakeholders’ perspectives on a project-based integrated curriculum in ICT engineering education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422221994471

Moretta, T., Buodo, G., Demetrovics, Z., & Potenza, M. N. (2022). Tracing 20 years of research on problematic use of the internet and social media: Theoretical models, assessment tools, and an agenda for future work. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 122, 152286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152286

Ng, D. T. K., Ng, E. H. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Engaging students in creative music making with musical instrument application in an online flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10568-2

Nix, V., Shelton, K., & Song, M. (2022). Implementing Affective Learning Outcomes Through a Meaning-centered Curriculum. In ICT and innovation in teaching learning methods in higher education (pp. 65–88). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2055-364120220000045005

O’Connell, M., & Marks, G. N. (2022). Cognitive ability and conscientiousness are more important than SES for educational attainment: An analysis of the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Personality and Individual Differences, 188, 111471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111471

Oh, S. H., & Leventhal, T. (2022). Breaking down the STEM pathway: Utilizing neighborhood resources to improve Mexican-origin adolescents’ life chances. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1760481. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21844

Perry, S., Bridges, S. M., & Burrow, M. F. (2022). A conceptual model for clinical psychomotor skill development in an era of simulated and virtual reality. European Journal of Dental Education, 26(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12699

Pratiwi, C. S. (2022). Indonesia’s Legal Policies Amid Covid-19: Balancing Religious Freedom and Public Health. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 6(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.27799

Privitera, A. J., Zhou, Y., & Xie, X. (2023). Inhibitory control as a significant predictor of academic performance in Chinese high schoolers. Child Neuropsychology, 29(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2098941

Raja, M., & Lakshmi Priya, G. G. (2022). Using virtual reality and augmented reality with ICT tools for enhancing quality in the changing academic environment in Covid-19 pandemic: an empirical study. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1019(Springer), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93921-2_26

Ramakrishnan, D., Van Le-Bucklin, K., Saba, T., Leverson, G., Kim, J. H., & Elfenbein, D. M. (2022). What Does Honors Mean? National Analysis of Medical School Clinical Clerkship Grading. Journal of Surgical Education, 79(1), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.022

Rubiyatno, Perdana, R. P., Fallo, I. S., Arifin, Z., Nusri, A., Suryadi, D., … Fauziah, E. (2023). Analysis of differences in physical fitness levels of extracurricular futsal students: Survey studies on urban and rural environments. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 27(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2023.0304

Samsudin, Setiawan, E., Gani, R. A., Winarno, M. E., Suganda, M. A., Kardiyanto, D. W., & Németh, Z. (2023). Strategies for conducting online-based physical education research during COVID-19: investigate the lecturer’s perception. Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 9(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2023.09.01.02

Saputra, E., Putra, M. E., Rianto, L., Tjahyanto, T., Widiyati, R., & Aziz, I. (2023). Profil kebugaran jasmani pada mahasiswa yang mengikuti latihan beban: Yo-yo intermittent test level 1. Tanjungpura Journal of Coaching Research, 1(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.26418/tajor.v1i1.63856

Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., Miedijensky, S., & Malkinson, N. (2022). Designing new learning environments: An innovative pedagogical perspective. Curriculum Journal, 33(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.125

Savic, M., & Kashef, M. (2013). Learning outcomes in affective domain within contemporary architectural curricula. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9238-8

Schmiege, D., Arredondo, A. M. P., Ntajal, J., Paris, J. M. G., Savi, M. K., Patel, K., … Falkenberg, T. (2020). One Health in the context of coronavirus outbreaks: A systematic literature review. 10, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100170

See, B. H., Morris, R., Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., Easterbrook, M. J., Nieuwenhuis, M., … Banerjee, R. (2022). A conceptual replication study of a self-affirmation intervention to improve the academic achievement of low-income pupils in England. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.2022317

Selznick, B. S., Dahl, L. S., Youngerman, E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2022). Equitably linking integrative learning and students’ innovation capacities. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09570-w

Setiawan, R., Musta’in, M., & Sparingga, D. (2022). Duty vs Humanity: Police officer’s point of views in implementing policies as corona virus disease (Covid-19) taskforce. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(3), 725–728. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i4.3684

Sevak, G., Singh Chauhan, Y., Parihar, N., & Singh Rathore, M. (2022). Review of novel corona virus disease (Covid-19) in India. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, 14(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5836.2022.00018

Srivatanakul, T. (2022). Emerging from the pandemic: instructor reflections and students’ perceptions on an introductory programming course in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11328-6

Stylos, N., Bigné, E., & Bellou, V. (2022). The affective impact of sightseeing bus tour experiences: using Affective Events Theory (AET) to examine length-of-stay and electronic word-of-mouth. Tourism Recreation Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2101273

Suganda, M. A., & Suharjana, S. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajaran bolavoli pada siswa sekolah dasar kelas atas. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 1(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i2.2571

Sukmawati, S., Sujarwo, S., Soepriadi, D. N., & Amaliah, N. (2022). Online english language teaching in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic: Non EFL students’ feedback and response. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 29(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v29i1.732

Suryadi, D. (2022). Analisis kebugaran jasmani siswa: Studi komparatif antara ekstrakurikuler bolabasket dan futsal. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 3(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.25299/es:ijope.2022.vol3(2).9280

Suryadi, D., & Rubiyanto. (2022). Kebugaran Jasmani Pada Siswa Yang Mengikuti Ekstrakulikuler Futsal. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26418/jilo.v5i1

Suryadi, D., Samodra, Y. T. J., Gustian, U., Yosika, G. F., B, P. S., Dewintha, R., & Saputra, E. (2023). Problem-based learning model: Can it improve learning outcomes for long serve in badminton. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 4(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.25299/es:ijope.2023.vol4(1).10987

Suryadi, D., Samodra, Y. T. J., & Purnomo, E. (2021). Efektivitas latihan weight training terhadap kebugaran jasmani. Journal RESPECS, 3(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.31949/respecs.v3i2.1029

Suryadi, D., Suganda, M. A., Sacko, M., Samodra, Y. T. J., Rubiyatno, R., Supriatna, E., … Okilanda, A. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Soccer and Futsal Extracurriculars: A Survey Study of Physical Fitness Profiles. Physical Education and Sports: Studies and Research, 2(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.56003/pessr.v2i1.182

ten Cate, O., & Schumacher, D. J. (2022). Entrustable professional activities versus competencies and skills: Exploring why different concepts are often conflated. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(2), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10098-7

Tomkin, J. H., & West, M. (2022). STEM courses are harder: evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1

Veteska, J., Kursch, M., Svobodova, Z., Tureckiova, M., & Paulovcakova, L. (2020). Longitudinal co-teaching projects - Scoping review. 17th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2020, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90944-4_3

Wang, Y. (2022). Design of cloud video distance education system based on internet of things. ETE Journal of Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2021.2021826

Yalcin, A. S., Kilic, H. S., & Delen, D. (2022). The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121193

Descargas

Publicado

2023-09-15

Cómo citar

Umar, U., Okilanda, A., Suganda, M. A., Mardesia, P. ., Suryadi, D., Wahyuni, D., Widyastuti, S. R., Samodra, Y. T. J. ., & Kurniawan, F. (2023). Aprendizaje combinado y aprendizaje en línea con aprendizaje basado en proyectos: ¿Afectan a la cogni-ción y al rendimiento del aprendizaje psicomotor en condiciones físicas? (Blended learning and online learning with project-based learning: Do they affect cognition and psycho-motor learning achievement in physical conditions?). Retos, 50, 556–565. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.99965

Número

Sección

Artículos de carácter científico: trabajos de investigaciones básicas y/o aplicadas

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

1 2 3 > >>