Stroke mimics: a challenge for the emergency physician

Authors

  • J. Valle Alonso Hospital valle de los Pedroches
  • E. Lopera Lopera
  • M. Guillán
  • M.C. Muñoz
  • Y. Hernández

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0361

Keywords:

Stroke mimic. Stroke. Diagnosis.

Abstract

Background. To study the number of patients diagnosed with a stroke in the emergency service of a first level hospital and the proportion of these patients who were finally stroke mimics, as well as to describe and analyze the variables that can help in differential diagnosis in hospital emergency services.

Method. Nine month prospective study. All patients evaluated in emergency services and admitted with a diagnosis of stroke were included. Different clinical variables were analyzed that included prior history, history of the current event, general physical and neurological examination, NIHSS classification and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification. The final diagnosis was made by a panel of experts with access to clinical characteristics, image studies and other tests. The univariate and multivariate analysis determined the characteristics that help in distinguishing strokes from stroke mimics.

Results. One hundred and forty-four cases of stroke were registered; the final sample was made up of 140 patients. The final diagnosis was stroke in 103 out of 140 (73.6%) and stroke mimic in the rest. Eleven variables predicted the diagnosis in patients with a suspected stroke: age over 70 years (p=0.012), NIHSS classification > 5, reaching a clinical classification (p=0.019) capable of determining the exact start (p=0.000), abnormal vascular findings (p=0.014), gaze deviation (p=0.042), sight loss (p=0.052) and extensor plantar response (p=0.025) favored diagnosis of stroke, while epileptic seizures (p=0.029), neurological symptoms not congruent with the vascular territory (p=0.022) and abnormal findings in other systems (p=0.14) favored diagnosis of stroke mimic.

Conclusion. Stroke mimics constitute one-third of the patients admitted from emergency services as strokes, with a highly varied etiology. Achieving a suitable clinical history and a precise physical examination is of great importance and can help less experienced doctors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

J. Valle Alonso, Hospital valle de los Pedroches

NULL

References

1. GIBSON LM, WHITELEY W. The differential diagnosis of stroke: a systematic review. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2013; 4: 114-118.

https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2013.205

2. WINKLER DT, FLURI F, FUHR P, WETZEL SG, LYRER PA, RUEGG S, ET AL. Thrombolysis in stroke mimics: frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcome. Stroke 2009; 40: 1522-1525.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530352

3. UCHINO K, MASSARO L, HAMMER MD. Transient ischemic attack after tissue plasminogen activator: Aborted stroke or unnecessary stroke therapy? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 29: 57-61.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000255975

4. CHERNYSHEV OY, MARTIN-SCHILD S, ALBRIGHT KC, BARRETO A, MISRA V, ACOSTA I, ET AL. Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemia. Neurology 2010; 74: 1340-1345.

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dad5a6

5. GIRALDO EA, KHALID A, ZAND R. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h of symptom onset in patients with negative post-treatment stroke imaging for cerebral infarction. Neurocrit Care 2011; 15: 76-79

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9523-x

6. TSIVGOULIS G, ALEXANDROV AV, CHANG J, SHARMA VK, HOOVER SL, LAO AY, ET AL. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: a 6-year, single-care center study and a pooled analysis of reported series. Stroke 2011; 42: 1771-1774.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609339

7. GUILLAN M, ALONSO-CANOVAS A, GONZALEZ-VALCARCEL J, GARCIA BARRAGAN N, GARCIA CALDENTEY J, HERNANDEZ-MEDRANO I, ET AL. Stroke mimics treated with thrombolysis: further evidence on safety and distinctive clinical features. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 115-120.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000339676

8. BRUNSER AM, ILLANES S, LAVADOS PM, MUÑOZ P, CÁRCAMO D, HOPPE A et al. Exclusion criteria for intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: an observational study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 1140-1145.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.019

9. ZINKSTOK SM, ENGELTER ST, GENSICKE H, LYRER PA, RINGLEB PA, ARTTO V, ET AL. Safety of thrombolysis in stroke mimics: results from a multicenter cohort study. Stroke 2013 Apr; 44: 1080-1084.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000126

10. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). CIE-10. Décima revisión de la clasificación internacional de las enfermedades. Trastornos mentales y del comportamiento. Descripciones clínicas y pautas para el diagnóstico. División de Salud Mental, Ginebra. Meditor. Madrid 1992; 63-84.

11. LIBMAN RB, WIRKOWSKI E, ALVIR J, RAO TH.Conditions that mimic stroke in the emergency department. Implications for acute stroke trials. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 1119-1122.

https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540350113023

12. HARBISON J, HOSSAIN O, JENKINSON D, DAVIS J, LOUW SJ, FORD GA. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke. 2003; 34: 71-76.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000044170.46643.5E

13. SCOTT PA, SILBERGLEIT R. Misdiagnosis of stroke in tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients: characteristics and outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42: 611-618.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00443-8

14. SHELLHAAS RA, SMITH SE, O'TOOL E, LICHT DJ, ICHORD RN. Mimics of childhood stroke: characteristics of a prospective cohort. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 704-709.

https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2676

15. HAND PJ, KWAN J, LINDLEY RI, DENNIS MS, WARDLAW JM. Distinguishing between stroke and mimic at the bedside: the brain attack study Stroke 2006; 37: 769-775.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000204041.13466.4c

16. HEMMEN TM, MEYER BC, MCCLEAN TL, LYDEN PD. Identification of nonischemic stroke mimics among 411 code strokes at the University of California, San Diego, Stroke Center. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 17: 23-25.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.09.008

17. VROOMEN PC, BUDDINGH MK, LUIJCKX GJ, DE KEYSER J. The incidence of stroke mimics among stroke department admissions in relation to age group. J J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 17: 418-422.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.06.007

18. EL HUSSEINI N, GOLDSTEIN LB. ''Code stroke'': hospitalized versus emergency department patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 345-348.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.09.012

19. WARDLAW JM, MURRAY V, BERGE E, DEL ZOPPO G, SANDERCOCK P, LINDLEY RL et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379: 2364-2372.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60738-7

20. ROTHWELL PM, GILES MF, CHANDRATHEVA A, MARQUARDT L, GERAGHTY O, REDGRAVE JN, et al. Early use of Existing Preventive Strategies for Stroke (EXPRESS) study. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population based sequential comparison. Lancet 2007; 370: 1432-1442.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61448-2

21. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Manual de la OMS para la vigilancia paso a paso de accidentes cerebrovasculares. URL: http://www.paho.org/Spanish/AD/DPC/NC/stepsstroke. Pdf. [17.10.2009].

22. DENNIS MS, BAMFORD JM, SANDERCOCK PA, WARLOW CP, et al. Incidence of transient ischemic attacks in Oxfordshire, England. Stroke 1989; 20: 333-339.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.20.3.333

23. DÍAZ-GUZMÁN J, EGIDO-HERRERO JA, GABRIEL-SÁNCHEZ R, BARBERÀ G, FUENTES B, FERNÁNDEZ-PÉREZ C, ABILLEIRA S. Proyecto Ictus del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Cerebrovasculares de la Sociedad Española de Neurología. Incidencia de ictus en España. Bases metodológicas del estudio Iberictus. Rev Neurol 2008; 47: 617-623.

https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4712.2008576

24. GARCÍA-DE LUCAS MD, CASAS-FERNÁNDEZ DE TEJERINA JM, CARA-GARCÍA M. Acute cerebrovascular disease in the Northern Cordoba Health Area. Rev Neurol 2007; 44: 68-74.

https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4402.2006316

25. DÍAZ-GUZMÁN J, EGIDO JA, GABRIEL-SÁNCHEZ R, BARBERÁ-COMES G, FUENTES-GIMENO B, FERNÁNDEZ-PÉREZ C; IBERICTUS Study Investigators of the stroke project of the spanish cerebrovascular diseases study group. Stroke and transient ischemic attack incidence rate in Spain: The IBERICTUS Study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 272-281.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000342652

26. MOELLER JJ, KURNIAWAN J, GUBITZ GJ, ROSS JA, BHAN V et al. Diagnostic accuracy of neurological problems in the emergency department. Can J Neurol Sci 2008; 35: 335-341.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100008921

27. DE LA TORRE-LAVIANA FJ, MONICHE-ALVAREZ F, PALOMINO-GARCÍA A, CAYUELA-DOMÍNGUEZ A, VIGIL E, JIMÉNEZ MD. False diagnoses of strokes in emergency departments. Rev Neurol 2010; 50: 463-469.

https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.5008.2009637

28. FÖRSTER A, GRIEBE M, WOLF ME, SZABO K, HENNERICI MG, KERN R. How to identify stroke mimics in patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis? J Neurol 2012; 259: 1347-1353.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6354-9

29. AMORT M, FLURI F, SCHÄFER J, WEISSKOPF F, KATAN M, BUROW A, et al. Transient ischemic attack versus transient ischemic attack mimics: frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 32: 57-64.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000327034

30. FERRO JM, PINTO AN, FALCÃO I, RODRIGUES G, FERREIRA J, FALCÃO F, et al. Diagnosis of stroke by the nonneurologist. A validation study. Stroke 1998; 29: 1106-1109.

https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.6.1106

31. ALLEN CM. Clinical diagnosis of the acute stroke syndrome. Q J Med 1983; 52: 515-523.

32. WEISBERG LA, NICE CN. Intracranial tumors simulating the presentation of cerebrovascular syndromes. Early detection with cerebral computed tomography (CCT). Am J Med 1977; 63: 517-524.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(77)90196-6

33. MERINO JG, LUBY M, BENSON RT, DAVIS LA, HSIA AW, LATOUR LL, ET AL. Predictors of Acute Stroke Mimics in 8187 Patients Referred to a Stroke Service. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 397-403.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.018

34. MONTANER J, MENDIOROZ M, RIBÓ M, DELGADO P, QUINTANA M, PENALBA A, ET AL. A panel of biomarkers including caspase-3 and D-dimer may differentiate acute stroke from stroke-mimicking conditions in the emergency department. J Intern Med 2011; 270: 166-174.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02329.x

Published

2014-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Valle Alonso J, Lopera Lopera E, Guillán M, Muñoz M, Hernández Y. Stroke mimics: a challenge for the emergency physician. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2014 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 23];37(1):117-28. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/23974

Issue

Section

Short articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.