Calidad evaluativa de la prueba de Desarrollo Motor Grueso 2: Una investigación basada en la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem (Evaluative quality of Test of Gross Motor Development 2: A investigation based on Item Response Theory)

Una investigación preliminar basada en la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem

Autores/as

  • Patrik Felipe Nazario Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Luciana Ferreira Universidade do Estado do Paraná
  • Jorge Both Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • José Luiz Lopes Vieira Universidad Católica del Maule.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.86427

Palabras clave:

Habilidad motora, psicometría, teoría de respuesta al ítem

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio fue verificar el grado de dificultad y capacidad de discriminación de los criterios utilizados para evaluar las habilidades motoras del TGMD-2. El estudio incluyó a 159 niños, de ambos sexos, con edades comprendidas entre los 7 y 8 años, de cuatro escuelas públicas de la ciudad de Maringá-PR, Brazil. El instrumento analizado fue el Test de Desarrollo Motor Grueso - 2ª edición. Los análisis estadísticos se guiaron por el modelo logístico de dos parámetros para datos dicotómicos. Los resultados apuntan el escaso poder discriminatorio de algunos criterios para evaluar el nivel de desempeño motor de los niños en las dimensiones de locomoción y manipulación de objetos, permitiendo reducir el número de criterios / habilidades motoras presentes en cada dimensión. Se concluyó que el modelo inicial con 48 criterios y 12 habilidades motoras no se ajustaba a la muestra de estudio y el uso de la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem es una herramienta complementaria que permite identificar el grado de dificultad de cada ítem y su capacidad discriminatoria en cada uno de los criterios propuestos en la evaluación de la motricidad del TGMD-2. 

Abstract. The objective of the study was to verify the degree of difficulty and capacity of discrimination of the criteria used to evaluate the motor skills of TGMD-2. The study included 159 children, of both sexes, aged between 7 and 8 years old, from four public schools in the city of Maringá-PR, Brazil. The instrument analyzed was the Test of Gross Motor Development - 2nd edition. The statistical analyzes were guided by the two-parameter logistic model for dichotomous data. The results point out the low discriminatory power of some criterias to assess the level of children's motor performance in the dimensions of locomotion and object manipulation, making it possible to reduce the number of criteria / motor skills present in each dimension. It was concluded that the initial model with 48 criteria and 12 motor skills did not fit the study sample and the use of Item Response Theory is a complementary tool to identify the degree of difficulty of each item, including a discriminatory capacity for each of the criteria proposed in the evaluation of the TGMD-2 motor skills.

Biografía del autor/a

Patrik Felipe Nazario, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Doutor em Educação Física

Luciana Ferreira, Universidade do Estado do Paraná

Doutora em Educação Física

Jorge Both, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Doutor em Educação Física

José Luiz Lopes Vieira, Universidad Católica del Maule.

Doutor em Educação Física

Citas

Aye, T., Kuramoto-Ahuja, T., Sato, T., Sadakiyo, K., Watanabe, M., & Maruyama, H. (2018). Gross motor skill development of kindergarten children in Japan. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 30(5), 711-715. https://doi:10.1589/jpts.30.711.

Aye, T., Oo K. S., Khin, M. T., Kuramoto-Ahuja, T., & Maruyama, H. (2017). Gross motor skill development of 5-year-old Kindergarten children in Myanmar. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29(10), 1772-1778. https://doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1772.

Baker F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland College Park.

Bardid, F., Utesch, T., & Lenoir M. (2019). Investigating the construct of motor competence in middle childhood using the BOT‐2 Short Form: An item response theory perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine Sciences and Sports, 29(12), 1980-1987. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13527.

Bekhechi, A. K., & Khiat, B. (2019). Impact of regular physical activity and sports on school performance among girls and boys aged between 6 and 10 years. Retos, 36, 398-402. https://doi.org/10.47197.retos.v36i36.

Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in infering an examinee’s ability. In F. M., Lord & M. R., Novick., (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. (pp. 258-276). Reding, MA: Addison-Wesle.

Caçola, P., Ibana, M., Ricard, M., & Gabbard, C. (2016). Children with developmental coordination disorder demonstrate a spatial mismatch when estimating coincident-timing ability with tools. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 124–131. https://doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.021.

Cano-Cappellacci, M., Leyton, F. A., & Carreño, J. D. (2015). Content validity and reliability of test of gross motor development in Chilean children. Revista de Saúde Pública, 49(97), 1-7. https://doi:10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005724 .

Ellinoudis. T., Evaggelinou, C., Kourtessis, T., Konstantinidou, Z., Venetsanou, F., & Kambas, A. (2011). Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – Second Edition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1046-1051. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.035

Farrokhi, A., Zadeh, M. Z., Alvar, L. K., Kazemnejad, A., & IIbeigi, S. (2014). Reliability and validity of test of gross motor development-2 (Ulrich, 2000) among 3-10 aged children of Tehran City. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Management, 5(2), 18-28.

Foulkes, J. D., Knowles, Z., Fairclough, S. J., Stratton, G., O ‘Dwyer, M., & Ridgers, N. D. (2015). Fundamental movement skills of preschool children in Northwest England. Perceptual Motor Skills, 121(1), 260-283.

García-Marín, P., & Fernández-López, N. (2020). Asociación de la competencia en las habilidades motrices básicas con las actividades físico-deportivas extracurriculares y el índice de masa corporal en preescolares. Retos, 38, 33-39. https://doi.org/1047197/retos.v38i38.71896

Hua, J., Gu, G., Weng, W., & Wu, Z. (2013). Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: Exploring its usefulness in Mainland China. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 801-808. 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.012

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística/IBGE. Disponível em: < http://www.censo2010.ibge.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 20 de novembro de 2015.

Kim, C. I., Han, D. W., & Park, I. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Test of gross motor development-II in Korean preschool children: Applying AHP. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 800–807. https://doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.019.

Kim. S., Kim, M. J., Valentini, N. C., & Clark, J. E. (2014). Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for South Korean children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(5), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.914886.

Kit, K. B., Akinbami, L. J., Isfahani, N. S., & Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Gross motor development in children aged 3–5 years, United States 2012. Matern Child Health Journal, 21(7), 1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2289-9v.

Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores (Psychometric Monograph). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN07.pdf

Magistro, D., Piumatti, G., Carlevaroc F., Sherar, B., Esliger, D. W., Bardaglioc. G, Magnoc, F., Zecca, M., & Musellac, G. (2020). Psychometric proprieties of the Test of Gross Motor Development–Third Edition in a large sample of Italian children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20, 860-865. https://doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2020.02.014.

Mamani-Ramos, A. A., Dextre-Mendoza, C. W., Gálvez, J. J. L., Flores, G. T., Cruz, L. M. Q., Torres-Cruz, F., Mamani, J. A. Q., & Fuentes-López, J. D. (2021). Gross motor development in preschoolers on the islands of Lake Titicaca (3810 m.a.s.l.), Puno, Peru. Retos, 39, 592-597. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.79522.

Pasquali, L., & Primi, R. (2003). Fundamentos da teoria da resposta ao item - TRI. Avaliação Psicológica, (2), 99-110.

Pizzo, G. C., Amaro, G. F. N., Silva, P. N., Caruzzo, N. M., Vieira, J. L. L., & Nazario, P. F. (2013). Ambiente domiciliar e desempenho motor de pré-escolares. Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte, 11(2), 01-08.

Quitério, A., Costa, J., Martins, M., Martins, J., Onofre, M., Gerlach, E., Scheuer, C., & Christian Herrmann, C. (2017). Educación Física: Evaluación de las habilidades motoras en los estudiantes de seis años, en el primer año de escolarización. Retos, 31, 259-263. https://doi:10.47197/retos.v0i31.53500.

Rey, E., Carballo-Fazanes, A., Varela-Casal, C., & Abelairas-Gomez, C, on behalf of ALFA-MOV Project collaborators. (2020). Reliability of the test of gross motor development: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0236070. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0236070

Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1-25.

Rosenblum S. (2015). Do motor ability and handwriting kinematic measures predict organizational ability among children with Developmental Coordination Disorders? Human Movement Science, 43, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.014.

Simons, J., Daly, D., Theodorou, F., Caron, C., Simons, J., & Andoniadou, E. (2007). Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 in 7–10-Year-Old Flemish children with intellectual disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25(1), 71-82. https://doi:10.1123/apaq.25.1.71.

Smits-Engelsmann, B. C. M., Henderson, S. E., & Michels, C. G. J. (1998). The assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorders in the Netherlands: The relationship between the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder. Human Movement Science, 17(4-5), 699-709.

Spessato, B.C., Gabbard, C., Valentini, N., & Rudisill, M. (2012). Gender differences in Brazilian children's fundamental movement skill performance. Early Child Development and Care, 182(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.689761.

Tezza, R., Bornia, A. C., & Andrade, D. F. D. (2011). Measuring web usability using item response theory: Principles, features and opportunities. Interacting with Computers, 23(2), 167-175. https://doi:10.1016/jintcom.2011.02.004.

Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Valentini NC. (2012). Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for Brazilian children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44(4), 275-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.700967.

Valentini, N. C., Barbosa, M. C. L., Cini, G. V., Pick, R. K., Spessato, B. C., & Balbinotti, M. A. A. (2008). Teste de desenvolvimento motor grosso: validade e consistência interna para uma população gaúcha. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 10(4), 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p399.

Vargas, L. M., Gutierrez, G. L., Cantorani, J. R. H., Pilatti, L. A., & Gorla, J. I. (2018). Desenvolvimento das habilidades motoras fundamentais em crianças com deficiência intelectual: diferença entre os sexos. Cadernos de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento São Paulo, 18(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.5935/cadernosdisturbios.v18n1p83-103.

Vendramini, C. M. M., Silva, M. C., & Canale, M. (2004). Análise de itens de uma prova de raciocínio estatístico. Psicologia em Estudo, 9(3), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1590/S141373722004000300017.

Wagner, M. O., Kastner, J., Petermann, F., & Bös, K. (2011). Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 674-80. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.016

Wong, K. Y. A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14(3), 202–09. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913671003726968.

Yun, J., & Ulrich, D. A. (2002). Estimating measurement validity: A tutorial. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.19.1.32

Publicado

2021-10-01

Cómo citar

Nazario, P. F., Ferreira, L., Both, J., & Lopes Vieira, J. L. (2021). Calidad evaluativa de la prueba de Desarrollo Motor Grueso 2: Una investigación basada en la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem (Evaluative quality of Test of Gross Motor Development 2: A investigation based on Item Response Theory): Una investigación preliminar basada en la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem. Retos, 42, 696–704. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.86427

Número

Sección

Artículos de carácter científico: trabajos de investigaciones básicas y/o aplicadas

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a