Effectiveness of back therapeutic exercises and Pilates on the clinical improvement of the intensity of chronic low back pain and determination of the minimal clinically important improvement threshold from treatments in a hospital setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109841Keywords:
Ejercicios terapéuticos para la espalda, Pilates, dolor lumbar crónico, Escala Visual Analógica del Dolor, Cambio Mínimo Clínicamente Importante.Abstract
The primary aim was to compare the effectiveness of therapeutic back exercises and Pilates in reducing chronic low back pain and to determine the threshold of improvement and the difference in pre- and post-treatment scores considered clinically relevant for patients. Methodology: A total of 53 patients with chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to two groups: one with 27 participants performing Pilates and another with 26 participants following a back exercise program. The treatment consisted of sessions twice a week for three months. Pain intensity was assessed before and after treatment using the Visual Analog Pain Scale. A clinically relevant threshold was defined as a sufficient reduction in pain score for patients to feel "very satisfied." A Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the improvement threshold. Additionally, a linear regression model was applied to analyze the relationship between score difference and the percentage of improvement. Results: Although both groups showed significant improvements in pain reduction after treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between them. The average reductions in both groups did not exceed two points (Back Exercise Group = 1.43 points, Pilates Group = 1.82 points), thus not reaching the two-point average improvement required to meet the clinically relevant improvement threshold. However, at an individual level, 45.83% of the Pilates group and 37.5% of the back exercise group achieved a clinically relevant improvement (≥30% improvement). The improvement threshold of 31.4%, equivalent to a two-point reduction, was correlated with greater clinical satisfaction (sensitivity 84%, specificity 87%). Conclusions: Both treatments produced beneficial effects in reducing chronic low back pain. However, the average improvement was not clinically relevant for the overall sample. At an individual level, a significant proportion of patients achieved clinically relevant improvement, particularly in the Pilates group. The 31.4% improvement threshold serves as an additional indicator for evaluating the clinical relevance of treatments.
Keywords: Therapeutic back exercises, Pilates, chronic low back pain, Visual Analog Scale for Pain, Minimal Clinically Important Change.
References
Alcántara Montero, A, & González Curado, A. (2019). Nuevas directrices del ACP para el dolor lumbar no radicular. Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor, 26(4), 254. Epub 23 de marzo de 2020.https://dx.doi.org/10.20986/resed.2017.3590/2017
Ángel García, D., Martínez Nicolás, I., Saturno Hernández, P.J., & López Soriano, F.. (2015). Abordaje clínico del dolor lumbar crónico: síntesis de recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia de las guías de práctica clínica existentes. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 38(1), 117-130. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272015000100012
Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya. (2022). Eficacia y seguridad del método Pilates en las condiciones clíni-cas seleccionadas. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad. Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya; 2022. (Colección: Informes, estudios e investigación. Ministerio de Sanidad). https://www.conprueba.es/sites/default/files/informes/2022-10/11.2_2019_AQuAS_Pilates_DEF_2022.pdf
Barrera Valencia, M. (2008). Diferencias estadísticamente significativas vs. relevancia clínica. CES Medicina, 22(1), 89–96. https://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/medi-cina/article/view/528
Batıbay, S., Külcü, D. G., Kaleoğlu, Ö., & Mesci, N. (2021). Effect of Pilates mat exercise and home exercise programs on pain, functional level, and core muscle thickness in women with chronic low back pain. Journal of orthopaedic sci-ence: official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 26(6), 979–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.026
Baskan O, Cavlak U, & Baskan E. (2021).Effectiveness of a clinical pilates program in women with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial pilates for back pain. Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, 12, 478–82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354193755_Effectiveness_of_a_clinical_pilates_program_in_women_with_chronic_low_back_pain_A_randomized_controlled_trial
Bekkering, G., et al. (2003). Dutch physiotherapy guidelines for low back pain. Physiotherapy, 89: 82-96. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/dutch-physiotherapy-guidelines-for-low-back-pain
Çakmak Başer, Ö., Ay, S., & Evcik, D. (2020). Cost-effectiveness analysis of chronic mechanical back pain treatment modalities. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 66(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.4174
Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T., Jr, Shekelle, P., Owens, D. K., Clinical Efficacy Assessment Sub-committee of the American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians, & American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel (2007). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of internal medicine, 147(7), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006
Chou, R., Deyo, R., Friedly, J., Skelly, A., Hashimoto, R., Weimer, M., Fu, R., Dana, T., Kraegel, P., Griffin, J., Grusing, S., & Brodt, E. D. (2017). Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Annals of internal medicine, 166(7), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2459
Cruz-Díaz, D., Bergamin, M., Gobbo, S., Martínez-Amat, A., & Hita-Contreras, F. (2017). Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complementary therapies in medicine, 33, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.06.004
da Silva PHB, da Silva DF, da Silva Oliveira JK, & de Oliveira FB. (2018). The effect of the pilates method on the treat-ment of chronic low back pain: a clinical, randomized, controlled study. Brazilian Journal of Pain, 1, 21–8. https://www.scielo.br/j/brjp/a/wg6KjcSSQrW6QPYV69TWMjB/?format=pdf&lang=en
da Luz, M. A., Jr, Costa, L. O., Fuhro, F. F., Manzoni, A. C., Oliveira, N. T., & Cabral, C. M. (2014). Effectiveness of mat Pilates or equipment-based Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized con-trolled trial. Physical therapy, 94(5), 623–631. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130277
Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., Carrino, J., Chou, R., Cook, K., Delitto, A., Goertz, C., Khalsa, P., Loeser, J., Mackey, S., Panagis, J., Rainville, J., Tosteson, T., Turk, D., Von Korff, M., & Weiner, D. K. (2015). Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Physical thera-py, 95(2), e1–e18. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.2015.95.2.e1
Donzelli, S., Di Domenica, E., Cova, A. M., Galletti, R., & Giunta, N. (2006). Two different techniques in the rehabilita-tion treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Europa medicophysica, 42(3), 205–210. https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/europa-medicophysica/article.php?cod=R33Y2006N03A0205
Durmus, D., Unal, M., & Kuru, O. (2014). How effective is a modified exercise program on its own or with back school in chronic low back pain? A randomized-controlled clinical trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 27(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-140481
Flynn D. M. (2020). Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Nonpharmacologic, Noninvasive Treatments. American family physician, 102(8), 465–477. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/1015/p465.html
Gallagher, E. J., Liebman, M., & Bijur, P. E. (2001). Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Annals of emergency medicine, 38(6), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.118863
Hägg, O., Fritzell, P., Nordwall, A., & Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2003). The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 12(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0464-0
Institute of Health Economics. Guideline for the Evidence-Informed Primary Care management for Low Back Pain. 3rd Edition minor revision 2017 (2017) Alberta, Canada. https://www.ihe.ca/public/uploaded/lbp-guideline%20(1).pdf
Iraurgi, I. (2009). Evaluación de resultados clínicos I: Entre la significación estadística y la relevancia clínica. NORTE de Salud Mental, 33, 94-108 https://dial-net.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4830140
Iraurgi, I. (2010). Evaluación de resultados clínicos (y III): Índices de Cambio Fiable (ICF) como estimadores del cambio clínicamente significativo. NORTE de Salud Mental, 8(36), 105-122. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ser-vlet/articulo?codigo=4830423
Junta de Castilla y León. Consejería de Sanidad. Gerencia Regional de Salud. (2018). Protocolos de fisioterapia en atención primaria: Protocolo de patología lumbar. https://www.saludcastillayleon.es/profesiona-les/es/programas-guias-clinicas/guias-practica-cli-nica/guias-clinicas
Kelly A. M. (2001). The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 18(3), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.3.205
Kovacs, F. M., Abraira, V., Royuela, A., Corcoll, J., Alegre, L., Cano, A., Muriel, A., Zamora, J., del Real, M. T., Gestoso, M., & Mufraggi, N. (2007). Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. Spine, 32(25), 2915–2920. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae
Miyamoto, G. C., Costa, L. O., Galvanin, T., & Cabral, C. M. (2013). Efficacy of the addition of modified Pilates exercises to a minimal intervention in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy, 93(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120190
Miyamoto, G. C., Franco, K. F. M., van Dongen, J. M., Franco, Y. R. D. S., de Oliveira, N. T. B., Amaral, D. D. V., Branco, A. N. C., da Silva, M. L., van Tulder, M. W., & Cabral, C. M. N. (2018). Different doses of Pilates-based exercise ther-apy for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. British journal of sports medicine, 52(13), 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098825
Morone, G., Paolucci, T., Alcuri, M. R., Vulpiani, M. C., Matano, A., Bureca, I., Paolucci, S., & Saraceni, V. M. (2011). Quality of life improved by multidisciplinary back school program in patıents with chronic non-specific low back pain: a single blind randomized controlled trial. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 47(4), 533–541.
Ostelo, R. W., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., Von Korff, M., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2008). Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine, 33(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10
Ostelo, R. W., & de Vet, H. C. (2005). Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology, 19(4), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003
Pérez-Irazusta I, Alcorta-Michelena I, Aguirre-Lejarcegui G, Aristegi Racero G, Caso Martinez J, Esquisabel Martinez R, et al. (2007). Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre Lumbalgia. Osakidezta y Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, edi-tores. Vitoria-Gasteiz; 2007. https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/osteba_publicaciones/es_osteba/adjuntos/gpc_07-1%20lumbalgia.pdf
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., Forciea, M. A., Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physi-cians, Denberg, T. D., Barry, M. J., Boyd, C., Chow, R. D., Fitterman, N., Harris, R. P., Humphrey, L. L., & Vijan, S. (2017). Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Annals of internal medicine, 166(7), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2367
Sadeghi-Abdollahi, B., Eshaghi, A., Hosseini, S. N., Ghahremani, M., & Davatchi, F. (2012). The efficacy of Back School on chronic low back pain of workers of a pharmaceutical company in a Tehran suburb. COPCORD stage II study. In-ternational journal of rheumatic diseases, 15(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01660.x
Sadovsky, R. ( 2002 ). Cambios clínicamente importantes en la severidad del dolor en la escala analógica visual . American Family Physician, 65(9), 1916–1921 .https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2002/0501/p1917.html#article-comment-area
Shirado, O., Ito, T., Kikumoto, T., Takeda, N., Minami, A., & Strax, T. E. (2005). A novel back school using a multidiscipli-nary team approach featuring quantitative functional evaluation and therapeutic exercises for patients with chronic low back pain: the Japanese experience in the general setting. Spine, 30(10), 1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000162279.94779.05
Skelly, A. C., Chou, R., Dettori, J. R., Turner, J. A., Friedly, J. L., Rundell, S. D., Fu, R., Brodt, E. D., Wasson, N., Kantner, S., & Ferguson, A. J. R. (2020). Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556229/
Stieglitz, D. D., Vinson, D. R., & Hampton, M. C. (2016). Equipment-based Pilates reduces work-related chronic low back pain and disability: A pilot study. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 20(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.06.006
van der Roer, N., Ostelo, R. W., Bekkering, G. E., van Tulder, M. W., & de Vet, H. C. (2006). Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine, 31(5), 578–582. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47
Vidal Fuentes, J. (2020). Versión actualizada de la definición de dolor de la IASP: un paso adelante o un paso atrás. Revista de la Sociedad Española del dolor, 27(4), 232-233. DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3839/2020
World Health Organization. (2023). WHO guideline for non-surgical management of chronic primary low back pain in adults in primary and community care settings: Executive summary. https://www.who.int/publica-tions/i/item/9789240081789
Yalfani, A., Raeisi, Z., & Koumasian, Z. (2020). Effects of eight-week water versus mat pilates on female patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 24(4), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.002
Yang, C. Y., Tsai, Y. A., Wu, P. K., Ho, S. Y., Chou, C. Y., & Huang, S. F. (2021). Pilates-based core exercise improves health-related quality of life in people living with chronic low back pain: A pilot study. Journal of bodywork and movement thera-pies, 27, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.006
Yıldırım, P., Basol, G., & Karahan, A. Y. (2022). Pilates-based therapeutic exercise for pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 69(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.11054
Zhou, T., Salman, D., & McGregor, A. H. (2024). Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 25(1), 344. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Retos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
