Analysis of the effectiveness of assisted reproduction techniques:

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0254

Keywords:

Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas. Ensayo Clínico. Resultado del Tratamiento. Efectividad. Revisión Sistemática.

Abstract

There are a high number of people affected by infertility who require assisted reproduction techniques. For this reason the aim of this review was to analyze the effectiveness of the interventions carried out using these techniques. A systematic peer review was performed on twelve databases. Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, published between 2011 and 2016, and with a score greater than two on the Jadad scale. The pharmacological interventions that proved effective were the administration of hormones, intrauterine human chorionic gonadotropin, gonadotrophin and dehydroepiandrosterone, and metformin. An effective surgical intervention, endometrial scratching, was identified. No effective non-pharmacological interventions were found. Assisted reproduction techniques show heterogeneity in both the interventions included and effectiveness criteria (pregnancy rate, live birth rate or implantation rate), which makes a unification of criteria necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M. Viera-Molina, Universidad de Sevilla

Doctoranda Programa de Doctorado Interuniversitario en Ciencias de la Salud. Máster oficial Nuevas Tendencias Asistenciales en Ciencias de la Salud. Diplomada en Enfermería. Universidad de Sevilla.

Especialidad de Enfermería Familiar y Comunitaria, vía EIR.

M. D. Guerra-Martín, Universidad de Sevilla

Doctora Internacional por la Universidad de Sevilla. 

Licenciada en Antropología.

Diplomada en Enfermería.

Profesora Titular de Universidad. Con un sexenio de investigación.

Departamento de Enfermería.

Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología.

UNiversidad de Sevilla.

References

DAMARIO M. General aspects of fertility and infertility. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1154: 3-23.

MASCARENHAS MN, FLAXMAN SR, BOERMA T, VANDERPOEL S, STEVENS GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A Systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012; 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.

BRUGO O, CHILIK M, KOPELMAN M. Infertility: causes and definitions. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2003; 54: 227-248.

BONFILL X, URRUTIA G. Análisis y generación de evidencias en reproducción medicamente asistida. [tesis doctoral]. Barcelona Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; 2015. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/tesis/2015/hdl_10803_322783/rbgv1de1.pdf

MATORRAS WR. La infertilidad en España: Situación actual y perspectivas. Madrid: Editorial Imago Concept & Image Development; 2011.

GONZÁLEZ F, GONZÁLEZ A, MARTÍNEZ M, FONTES J, MARTÍNEZ L. Esterilidad General. En: Matorras R, Hernández J. Estudio y tratamiento de la pareja estéril: recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad, con la colaboración de la Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Biología de la Reproducción, de la Asociación Española de Andrología y de la Sociedad Española de Contracepción. Madrid: Adalia; 2007. http://www.sefertilidad.net/docs/biblioteca/recomendaciones/completo.pdf

ZEGERS-HOCHSCHILD F, ADAMSON G, MOUZON B, ISHIHARA C, MANSOUR M, NYGREN E et al. Glosario de terminología en técnicas de reproducción asistida (TRA) 2010.

http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/art_terminology2/es/

HIGGINS J, GREEN S. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Manual_Cochrane_510_reduit.pdf

URRUTIA G, BONFILL, X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc) 2010; 135: 507-511.

FERREIRA I, URRUTIA G, ALONSO-COELLO P. Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64: 688-696.

DEL PINO C, FRÍAS O, PALOMINO M. La revisión sistemática cuantitativa en enfermería. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria 2014; 7: 1.

PERESTELO-PÉREZ L. Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health. Int J Clin Hlth Psyc 2013; 13: 49-57.

JADAD A, MOORE R, CARROLL D, JENKINSON D, REYNOLDS D, GAVAGHAN D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 1-12.

ABOULGHAR M, MARIE H, AMIN Y, ABOULGHAR M, NASR A, SEROUR G et al. GnRH agonist plus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in ICSI cycles: a randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30: 52-56.

ANDERSEN A, DEVROEY P, ARCE J. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 21-27.

NASTRI C, POLANSKI T, WELLINGTON P. Endometrial scratching for women with repeated implantation failure. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 2855-2856.

TARTAGNI M, CICINELLI M, BALDINI D, ALRASHEED H, DESALVIA M, LOVERRO G et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone decreases the age-related decline of the in vitro fertilization outcome in women younger than 40 years old. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 18.

TOUKHY T, CAMPO R, KHALAF Y, TABANELLI C, GIANAROLI L, GORDTS S et al. Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 25: 386-389.

BASSIOUNY Y, DAKHLY D, BAYOUMI Y, HASHISH N. Does the addition of growth hormone to the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection antagonist protocol improve outcomes in poor responders? A randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 697-702.

AALEYASIN A, AGHAHOSSEINI M, RASHIDI M, SAFDARIAN L, SARVI F, NAJMI Z et al. In vitro fertilization outcome following embryo transfer with or without preinstillation of human chorionic gonadotropin into the uterine cavity: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 79: 201-205.

DOMAR A, GROSS J, ROONEY K, BOIVIN J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 440-451.

MAYER R, EBNER T, YAMAN C, HARTL J,SIR A, KRAIN V, SHEBL O. Influence of intracervical and intravaginal seminal plasma on the endometrium in assisted reproduction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 132-138.

PALOMBA S, FALBO A, DI CELLO A, CAPPIELLO F, TOLINO A, ZULLO F. Does metformin affect the ovarian response to gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and reduced ovarian reserve? A randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 : 1128-1133.

SALA G, NICOLI A, FORNACIARI E, FALBO A, RONDINI I, MORINI D et al. intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 97.

SUNKARA S, COOMARASAMY A, FARIS R, BRAUDE P, KHALAF Y. Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013; 101: 147-153.

HORNSTEIN M. Lifestyle and IVF outcomes. Reprod Sci 2016; 23: 1626-1629.

JENARO R, MORENO-ROSSET C, ANTEQUERA J, FLORES R. La evaluación psicológica en infertilidad: el “DERA” una prueba creada en España. Revista Papeles del Psicólogo 2008; 29: 176-185. http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1584.pdf

MORENO, R, ANTEQUERA J, JERANO R, GÓMEZ S. La psicología de la reproducción: La necesidad del psicólogo en las unidades de reproducción humana. Revista Clínica y Salud 2009; 20: 79-90.

GRIESINGER G, DIEDRICH K, TARLATZIS B, KOLIBIANAKIS E. GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 628-638.

EFTEKHAR M, AFLATOONIAN A, MOHAMMADIAN F, EFTEKHAR T. Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 28: 17-21.

HARPER K, PROCTOR M, HUGHES E. Hormona del crecimiento para la fertilización in vitro. La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 2008; 4.

O TSO L, COSTELLO M, ALBUQUERQUE L, ANDRIOLO R, MACEDO C. Tratamiento con metformina antes y durante la FIV o la ICSI en pacientes con síndrome de ovario poliquístico. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014; 11. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006105.

BALASCH J, FÁBREGUES F, PEÑARRUBIA J, CARMONA F, CASAMITJANA R, CREUS M et al. Pretreatment with transdermal testosterone may improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins in poor-responder IVF patients with normal basal concentrations of FSH. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1884-1893.

BOSDOU J, VENETIS C, KOLIBIANAKIS E, TOULIS K, GOULIS D, ZEPIRIDIS L et al. The use of androgens or androgen-modulating agents in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2012; 18: 127-145.

REVELLI A, PETTINAU G, BASSO G, CAROSSO A., FERRERO A, DALLAN C et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human menopausal gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 25. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0080-6.

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Viera-Molina M, Guerra-Martín MD. Analysis of the effectiveness of assisted reproduction techniques:. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 14];41(1):107-16. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/60117

Issue

Section

Review article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.