Good care for patients who die in intensive care units in Spain. A study based on international care quality indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0026Keywords:
End-of-life care. Intensive care. Critical care. Palliative care. Quality improvement.Abstract
Background. Good care for patients who die in intensive care should be pursued in the same way that excellence is sought in other clinical aspects.
Objective. To assess the quality of clinical care given to patients who die in intensive care units (ICU) in Spain.
Methodos. A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who died in the ICU based on a Spanish sample. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years who died in ICU after a minimum stay of 24 hours. Consecutive admissions without exclusions were analyzed. Excellence criteria in intensive care were assessed by quality indicators and measures, related to end-of-life care, developed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup.
Results. Two hundred and eighty-two patients from 15 Spanish ICU were included. A median of 13% was observed in the achievement of the indicators. Almost all clinical records assessed both the patients’ decision making capacity (96%) and their communication with families (98%), while a plan of care goals was achieved in only 50% of them. Only two ICU had open visiting policies. Distress assessment (48%) was better than that of pain assessment (28%). The absence of protocol for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments was observed in thirteen ICU. The indicators of emotional and spiritual support were achieved in less than 10%.
Conclusions. The quality of end-of-life care in the participating ICU needs to be improved. The study identifies shortcomings and indicates existing resources in clinical practice from which a gradual improvement plan, adapted to the situation in each hospital, can be designed. The analysis, inexpensive in its implementation, offers an opportunity for improvement, a goal recommended by most professional societies of intensive care medicine.
Downloads
References
TRUOG RD, CAMPBELL ML, CURTIS JR, HAAS CE, LUCE JM, RUBENFELD GD et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 953-963.
CARLET J, THIJS LG, ANTONELLI M, CADDELL J, COX P, HILL N et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 770-784.
MONZÓN JL, SARALEGUI I, ABIZANDA R, CABRÉ L, IRIBARREN S, MARTIN MC et al. Recomendaciones de tratamiento al final de la vida del paciente crítico. Med Intensiva 2008; 32: 121-133.
ANGUS DC, BARNATO AE, LINDE-ZWIRBLE WT, WEISSFELD LA, WATSON RS, RICKERT T et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 638-643.
KNAUS WA, HARRELL FE JR, LYNN J, GOLDMAN L, PHILLIPS RS, CONNORS AF JR et al. The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann of Intern Med 1995; 122: 191-203.
NELSON JE. Identifying and overcoming the barriers to high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(Suppl 11): 324S-331S.
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Center to Advance Palliative Care, Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, Last Acts Partnership, National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines for quality palliative care, executive summary. J Palliat Med 2004; 7: 611-627.
CLARKE EB, CURTIS JP, LUCE JM, LEVY M, DANIS M, NELSON J et al. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2003; 3: 2255-2262.
MULARSKI RA, CURTIS JR, BILLINGS JA, BURT R, BYOCK I, FUHRMAN C et al. Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation critical care workgroup. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(Suppl 11): 404S -411S.
NELSON JE, MULKERIN CM, ADAMS LL, PROVONOST PJ. Improving confort and communication in the ICU: A practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 264-271.
NELSON JE, BASSETT R, BOSS RD, BRASEL KJ, CAMPBELL ML, CORTEZ TB et al. Models for structuring a clinical initiative to enhance palliative care in the intensive care unit: A report from the IPAL-ICU Project (Improving Palliative Care in the ICU). Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1765-1772.
RAY D, FUHRMAN C, STERN G, GERACCI J, WASSER T, ARNOLD D et al. Integrating palliative medicine and critical care in a community hospital. Crit Care Med 2006; 34( Suppl 11): 394S-398S.
SPRUNG CL, COHEN SL, SJOKVIST, BARAS M, BULOW HH, HOVILEHTO S et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 2003; 290: 790-797.
NELSON JE, BOSS RD, BRASEL KJ, CAMPBELL ML, CORTEZ TB, CURTIS JR et al. Defining standards for ICU palliative care: A brief review from the IPAL-ICU project (internet). Center to Advance Palliative Care. The IPAL Project 2010. http://ipal.capc.org/downloads/ipal-icu-defining-standards-for-icu-palliative-care.pdf. Consultado el 3 de febrero de 2017
PENROD JD, PRONOVOST PJ, LIVOTE EE, PUNTILLO KA, WALKER AS, WALLENSTEIN S et al. Meeting standards of high-quality intensive care unit palliative care: Clinical performance and predictors. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 1105-1112.
HERNÁNDEZ-TEJEDOR A, MARTÍN MC, CABRÉ L, ALGORA A, Members of the study group EPIPUSE. Limitation of life-sustaining treatment in patients with prolonged admission to the ICU. Current situation in Spain as seen from the EPIPUSE Study. Med Intensiva 2015; 39: 395-404.
VELASCO JM, PRIETO JF, CASTILLO J, MERINO N, PEREA-MILLA E. Organización de las visitas en las unidades de cuidados intensivos en España. Enferm Intensiva 2005; 16: 73-83.
COHEN S, SPRUNG C, SJOKVIST P, LIPPERT A, RICOU B, BARAS M et al. Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1215-1221.
HALPERN NA, PASTORES SM, CHOU JF, CHAWLA S, THALER HT. Advance directives in an oncologic intensive care unit: a contemporary analysis of their frequency, type, and impact. J Palliat Med 2011; 14: 483-9.
SPRUNG CL, TRUOG RD, CURTIS JR, JOYNT GM, BARAS M, MICHALSEN A et al. Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 190: 855-856.
KISH WALLACE S, MARTIN CG, SHAW AD, PRICE KJ. Influence of an advance directive on the initiation of life support technology in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2294-2298.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Disability Aging and Long-Term Planning. Advance directives and advance care planning: report to Congress August 2008. https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/advance-directives-and-advance-care-planning-report-congress. Consultado el 13 de mayo de 2017.
ROSEN DA, DOWER JM, PARKER JE, MOSH AH. Measuring intensive care unit palliative care: Have we set the bar too low? Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 1343-1345.
NELSON JE, MEIER DE, OEI EJ, NIERMAN DM, SENZEL RS, MANFREDI PL et al. Self-reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive careself reported. Crit Care Med 2001; 2: 277-282.
ESCUDERO D, MARTÍN L, VIÑA L, FORCELLEDO L, GARCÍA-ARIAS B, LÓPEZ-AMOR L. Open the doors on the ICU. An unavoidable necessity. Med Intensiva 2015; 39: 522-523.
KAHN JM. Quality Improvement in End-of-Life Critical Care. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 33: 375-381.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
