Técnicas analgésicas para el parto: alternativas en caso de fallo de la epidural

Autores/as

  • J. R. Ortíz-Gómez Anestesiología y Reanimación. Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra. Pamplona.
  • F. J. Palacio-Abizanda Servicio de Anestesiología. Hospital Gregorio Marañón. Madrid.
  • I. Fornet-Ruiz Servicio de Anestesiología. Hospital Puerta de Hierro. Madrid.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0326

Palabras clave:

Analgesia obstétrica. Dolor del parto. Epidural. Analgesia controlada por el paciente. Remifentanilo.

Resumen

La analgesia epidural es hoy día el método de elección para el tratamiento del dolor del trabajo de parto, el expulsivo y el alumbramiento. Sin embargo, esta técnica puede fallar y aliviar de forma inadecuada (o nula) a la parturienta. En el presente artículo se revisan los factores de riesgo, las posibles causas y las alternativas terapéuticas posibles a la analgesia inadecuada, ya sea mediante terapias farmacológicas (neuroaxiales, bloqueos periféricos o administración de analgésicos vía intravenosa o inhalatoria) o no farmacológicas (técnicas de relajación, psicológicas o mecánicas).

En todos los casos posibles se revisan la eficacia y las indicaciones de las terapias alternativas en función de la literatura publicada, especialmente desde el punto de vista de la medicina basada en la evidencia.

Se insiste en la necesidad de aplicar una aproximación terapéutica multifactorial a la embarazada, no limitándonos solo a eliminar el dolor del parto.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

1. MELZACK R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1: 277-299.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5

2. ORTIZ-GÓMEZ JR, PALACIO-ABIZANDA F, FORNET-RUIZ I. Alternatives to regional anesthesia for labor pain relief. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: E116-E123.

3. THANGAMUTHU A, RUSSELL IF, PURVA M. Epidural failure rate using a standardised definition. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 310- 315.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.04.013

4. PAN PH, BOGARD TD, OWEN MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 227-233.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.008

5. D'ANGELO R, FOSS ML, LIVESAY CH. A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1276-1279.

https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199706000-00019

6. D'ANGELO R, BERKEBILE BL, GERANCHER JC. Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 88-93.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199601000-00011

7. COLLIER CB. Why obstetric epidurals fail: a study of epidurograms. Int J Obstet Anesth1996; 5: 19-31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7

8. MICHAEL S, RICHMOND MN, BIRKS RJ. A comparison between open-end (single hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Complications and quality of sensory blockade. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 578-580.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11446.x

9. DUCROW M. The occurrence of unblocked segments during continous lumbar epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Br J Anaesth 1971; 43: 1172-1174.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/43.12.1172

10. TANAKA K, WATANABE R, HARADA T, DAN K. Extensive application of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in a university hospital: incidence of complications related to technique. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 34-38.

11. SHARROCK NE, URQUHART B, MINEO R. Extradural anaesthesia in patients with previous lumbar spine surgery. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 237-239.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/65.2.237

12. MCBETH C. Faulty loss of resistance syringe. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 186.

13. WEE LH. Another cause for failed epidural. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 270-271.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03458.x

14. HEIN A, ROSBLAD P, NORMAN M, RYNIAK S, TINGAKER B, JAKOBSSON J et al. Addition of low-dose morphine to intrathecal bupivacaine/sufentanil labour analgesia: A randomised controlled study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010; 19: 384-389.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.003

15. VAN DE VELDE M, TEUNKENS A, HANSSENS M, VANDERMEERSCH E, VERHAEGHE J. Intrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in labor. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1153-1159, table of contents.

https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000101980.34587.66

16. ERIKSSON SL, BLOMBERG I, OLOFSSON C. Single-shot intrathecal sufentanil with bupivacaine in late labour--analgesic quality and obstetric outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 110: 131-135.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00049-6

17. ORTIZ-GÓMEZ JR, PALACIO-ABIZANDA FJ, FORNET-RUIZ I, MONGE-CID E.All obese patients in labor should receive an epidural catheter? Pro-con discussion. The con point of view. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: Supplement: E52-E7.

18. HOOD DD, DEWAN DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 1210-1218.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199312000-00011

19. FAHEEM M, SARWAR N. Sliding of the skin over subcutaneous tissue is another important factor in epidural catheter migration. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49: 634.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017395

20. HAMILTON CL, RILEY ET, COHEN SE. Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 778-784; discussion 29A.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199704000-00007

21. IWAMA H, KATAYAMA T. Back skin movement also causes "walking" epidural catheter. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 140-141.

22. FIVEZ T, DEBLONDE S, VAN DE VELDE M. Late intravascular migration of a previously well functioning labour epidural catheter. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 634-636.

https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833665aa

23. NARANG VP, LINTER SP. Failure of extradural blockade in obstetrics. A new hypothesis. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60: 402-404.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/60.4.402

24. WITHINGTON DE, WEEKS SK. Repeat epidural analgesia and unilateral block. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 568-71.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009993

25. BLOMBERG R. The dorsomedian connective tissue band in the lumbar epidural space of humans: an anatomical study using epiduroscopy in autopsy cases. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 747-752.

https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198607000-00008

26. SAVOLAINE ER, PANDYA JB, GREENBLATT SH, CONOVER SR. Anatomy of the human lumbar epidural space: new insights using CT-epidurography. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 217-220.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198802000-00007

27. RAINBIRD A, PFITZNER J. Restricted spread of analgesia following epidural blood patch. Case report with a review of possible complications. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 481-484.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb14036.x

28. ONG BY, GRAHAM CR, RINGAERT KR, COHEN MM, PALAHNIUK RJ. Impaired epidural analgesia after dural puncture with and without subsequent blood patch. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 76-79.

https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199001000-00013

29. WOLFLER A, SALVO I, SORTINO G, BONATI F, IZZO F. Epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil is associated with transient fetal heart rate changes. Minerva Anestesiol 2010; 76: 340-345.

30. VAN DE VELDE M. Neuraxial analgesia and fetal bradycardia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2005; 18: 253-256.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000169230.53067.49

31. MARDIROSOFF C, DUMONT L, BOULVAIN M, TRAMER MR. Fetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review. BJOG 2002; 109: 274-281.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01380.x

32. CAPPIELLO E, O'ROURKE N, SEGAL S, TSEN LC. A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1646-1651.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318184ec14

33. THOMAS JA, PAN PH, HARRIS LC, OWEN MD, D'ANGELO R. Dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique does not improve labor epidural catheter function. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 1046-1051.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200511000-00019

34. PALACIO FJ, FORNET I, MORILLAS P, LOPEZ MA, REINA MA, LOPEZ A. Analgoanestesia subaracnoidea continua para trabajo de parto y cesarea enpaciente intervenida de ependimoma. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2008; 55: 371-374.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-9356(08)70594-2

35. MORENO A, PALACIO FJ, RODRIGUEZ FRAILE J, BERMEJO L, FORNET I, REINA MA. Analgesia obstétrica subaracnoidea continua. Una alternativa eficaz a laanestesia epidural. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2009; 56: 521-523.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-9356(09)70449-9

36. PALACIO-ABIZANDA FJ, ORTIZ-GOMEZ JR. Dolor en la paciente obstétrica. Plan maestro en abordaje integral del dolor Módulo 2 Madrid Ed. You&Us; 2006: 51-92

37. GRIMES DA, CATES W, JR. Deaths from paracervical anesthesia used for first-trimester abortion, 1972-1975. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 1397-1399.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197612162952503

38. ROSEN MA. Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S127-S130.

https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.121812

39. JUNTTILA EK, KARJALAINEN PK, OHTONEN PP, RAUDASKOSKI TH, RANTA PO. A comparison of paracervical block with single-shot spinal for labour analgesia in multiparous women: a randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Anesth 2009; 18: 15-21.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.01.020

40. ODEBLAD E. Biophysical composition of cervical mucus and spermigration during treatment with Conluten and Conlunett. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1968; 47: Suppl 8: 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016346809156616

41. GAD C. Paracervical block. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1967; 46: 7-18.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016346709158624

42. NYIRJESY I, HAWKS BL, HEBERT JE, HOPWOOD HG, JR., FALLS HC. Hazards of the Use of Paracervical Block Anesthesia in Obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 87: 231-235.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(63)90504-0

43. PALOMAKI O, HUHTALA H, KIRKINEN P. A comparative study of the safety of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% racemic bupivacaine for paracervical block in the first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 956-961.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00709.x

44. GIBBS CP, KRISCHER J, PECKHAM BM, SHARP H, KIRSCHBAUM TH. Obstetric anesthesia: a national survey. Anesthesiology 1986; 65: 298-306.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198609000-00010

45. SHNIDER SM, ASLING JH, HOLL JW, MARGOLIS AJ. Paracervical block anesthesia in obstetrics. I. Fetal complications and neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107: 619-625.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)33950-3

46. SCHIERUP L, SCHMIDT JF, TORP JENSEN A, RYE BA. Pudendal block in vaginal deliveries. Mepivacaine with and without epinephrine. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 195-197.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348809004200

47. SCUDAMORE JH, YATES MJ. Pudendal block--a misnomer? Lancet 1966; 1: 23-24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(66)90008-0

48. MERKOW AJ, MCGUINNESS GA, ERENBERG A, KENNEDY RL. The neonatal neurobehavioral effects of bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and 2-chloroprocaine used for pudendal block. Anesthesiology 1980; 52: 309-312.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198004000-00004

49. LIKIS FE, ANDREWS JC, COLLINS MR, LEWIS RM, SEROOGY JJ, STARR SA et al. Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 153-167.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a7f73c

50. ROSEN MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S110-S126.

https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.121259

51. RUIZ-ARAGON J, BELTRAN-CALVO C. Efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide 50% mixed with oxygen in the use as inhalation analgesic during labor. In: Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA). Health Technology Assessment ( HTA ). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Available at: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud/servicios/contenidos/nuevaaetsa/up/AETSA_P_2010_3_OxidoNitroso.pdf

52. MATTINGLY JE, D'ALESSIO J, RAMANATHAN J. Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate : a review. Paediatric drugs 2003; 5: 615-627.

https://doi.org/10.2165/00148581-200305090-00004

53. PETRIE RH, YEH SY, MURATA Y, PAUL RH, HON EH, BARRON BA et al. The effect of drugs on fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130:294-299.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(78)90498-2

54. BRICKER L, LAVENDER T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S94-S109.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70185-3

55. OLOFSSON C, EKBLOM A, EKMAN-ORDEBERG G, HJELM A, IRESTEDT L. Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 968-972.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09545.x

56. CALDWELL J, WAKILE LA, NOTARIANNI LJ, SMITH RL, CORREY GJ, LIEBERMAN BA et al. Maternal and neonatal disposition of pethidine in childbirth--a study using quantitative gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Life Sci 1978; 22: 589-596.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(78)90338-7

57. KUHNERT BR, LINN PL, KENNARD MJ, KUHNERT PM. Effects of low doses of meperidine on neonatal behavior. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 335-342.

https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198503000-00006

58. NISSEN E, WIDSTROM AM, LILJA G, MATTHIESEN AS, UVNÄS-MOBERG K, JACOBSSON G et al. Effects of routinely given pethidine during labour on infants' developing breastfeeding behaviour. Effects of dose-delivery time interval and various concentrations of pethidine/norpethidine in cord plasma. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86: 201-208.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08869.x

59. NYBERG K, BUKA SL, LIPSITT LP. Perinatal medication as a potential risk factor for adult drug abuse in a North American cohort. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 715-716.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200011000-00018

60. ULLMAN R, SMITH LA, BURNS E, MORI R, DOWSWELL T. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD007396.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub2

61. KLEIMAN SJ, WIESEL S, TESSLER MJ. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl in a parturient with a platelet function abnormality. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38: 489-491.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03007585

62. ROSAEG OP, KITTS JB, KOREN G, BYFORD LJ. Maternal and fetal effects of intravenous patient-controlled fentanyl analgesia during labour in a thrombocytopenic parturient. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 277-281.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008789

63. NIKKOLA EM, EKBLAD UU, KERO PO, ALIHANKA JJ, SALONEN MA. Intravenous fentanyl PCA during labour. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 1248-1255.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03012771

64. RAYBURN WF, SMITH CV, PARRIOTT JE, WOODS RE. Randomized comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 604-606.

65. EVRON S, EZRI T. Options for systemic labor analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007; 20: 181-185.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328136c1d1

66. BLAIR JM, DOBSON GT, HILL DA, MCCRACKEN GR, FEE JP. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 22-27.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03975.x

67. VOLIKAS I, MALE D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. J Obstet Anesth 2001; 10: 86-90.

https://doi.org/10.1054/ijoa.2000.0831

68. WESTMORELAND CL, HOKE JF, SEBEL PS, HUG CC, JR., MUIR KT. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil (GI87084B) and its major metabolite (GI90291) in patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 893-903.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199311000-00005

69. NGAN KEE WD, KHAW KS, MA KC, WONG AS, LEE BB, NG FF. Maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil at induction of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 14-20.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200601000-00004

70. JONES R, PEGRUM A, STACEY RG. Patient-controlled analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient with thrombocytopaenia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 461-465.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00857.x

71. BLAIR JM, HILL DA, FEE JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 415-420.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.3.415

72. KAN RE, HUGHES SC, ROSEN MA, KESSIN C, PRESTON PG, LOBO EP. Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 1467-1474.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199806000-00008

73. ROSS AK, DAVIS PJ, DEAR GD GL, GINSBERG B, MCGOWAN FX, STILLER RD et al. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery or diagnostic procedures. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1393-1401.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200112000-00008

74. LAVAND'HOMME P, ROELANTS F. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia as an alternative to epidural analgesia during labor: questioning the use of the short-acting opioid remifentanil. Survey in the French part of Belgium (Wallonia and Brussels). Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2009; 60: 75-82.

75. HINOVA A, FERNANDO R. Systemic remifentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1925-1929.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c03e0c

76. D'ONOFRIO P, NOVELLI AM, MECACCI F, SCARSELLI G. The efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of remifentanil for birth pain relief: an open study of 205 parturients. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1922-1924.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181acc6fc

77. HANOUZ JL, SIMONET T, MARLIOT C, MAYAND A, GIRARD A, RAKOTNIRINA N et al. Enquête nationale française sur l'utilisation de rémifentanil pour l'analgésie péridurale obstétricale. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012; 31: 682-686.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2012.02.018

78. HILL D. Remifentanil in obstetrics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21: 270-274.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f8e26c

79. VOLIKAS I, BUTWICK A, WILKINSON C, PLEMING A, NICHOLSON G. Maternal and neonatal side-effects of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 504-509.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei219

80. MARR R, HYAMS J, BYTHELL V. Cardiac arrest in an obstetric patient using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 283-287.

https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12099

81. ARNAL D, SERRANO ML, CORRAL EM, GARCIA DEL VALLE S. Remifentanilo intravenoso para analgesia del trabajo del parto. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2009; 56: 222-231.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-9356(09)70376-7

82. CARVALHO B, MIRIKITANI EJ, LYELL D, EVANS DA, DRUZIN M, RILEY ET. Neonatal chest wall rigidity following the use of remifentanil for cesarean delivery in a patient with autoimmune hepatitis and thrombocytopenia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 53-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2003.09.001

83. KONEFAL H, JASKOT B, CZESZYNSKA MB, PASTUSZKA J. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labor - monitoring of newborn heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during the first 24 hours after delivery. Archives of medical science : AMS 2013; 9: 697-702.

https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.31306

84. MARWAH R, HASSAN S, CARVALHO JC, BALKI M. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled labour analgesia: an observational study. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 246-254.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9625-0

85. HILL D. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be routinely available for use in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17: 336-339.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.03.005

86. BALCIOGLU O, AKIN S, DEMIR S, ARIBOGAN A. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil in nulliparous subjects in labor. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007; 8: 3089-3096.

https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.8.18.3089

87. BALKI M, KASODEKAR S, DHUMNE S, BERNSTEIN P, CARVALHO JC. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 626-633.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022956

88. LOPEZ-MILLAN JM, BLANCO L, ALCANIZ JB, DE LAS MULAS M. Analgesia del trabajo de parto con remifentanilo por vía intravenosa mediante un sistema de analgesia controlada por el paciente (PCIA) en un caso de esclerosis múltiple. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2007; 54: 200-202.

89. SHEN MK, WU ZF, ZHU AB, et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of maternal and neonatal effects of patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous infusion. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 236-244.

https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12098

90. VOLMANEN P, SARVELA J, AKURAL EI, RAUDASKOSKI T, KORTTILA K, ALAHUHTA S. Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double-blinded study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 249-255.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01509.x

91. VARPOSHTI MR, AHMADI N, MASOODIFAR M, SHAHSHAHAN Z, TABATABAIE MH. Comparison of remifentanil: Entonox with Entonox alone in labor analgesia. Adv Biomed Res 2013; 2: 87.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.122511

92. EL-KERDAWY H, FAROUK A. Labor analgesia in preeclampsia: remifentanil patient controlled intravenous analgesia versus epidural analgesia. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2010; 20: 539-545.

93. EVRON S, GLEZERMAN M, SADAN O, BOAZ M, EZRI T. Remifentanil: a novel systemic analgesic for labor pain. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 233-238.

https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000143351.64538.BC

94. LEONG WL, SNG BL, SIA AT. A comparison between remifentanil and meperidine for labor analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 818-825.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182289fe9

95. DOUMA MR, VERWEY RA, KAM-ENDTZ CE, VAN DER LINDEN PD, STIENSTRA R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 209-215.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep359

96. VOLMANEN P, AKURAL E, RAUDASKOSKI T, OHTONEN P, ALAHUHTA S. Comparison of remifentanil and nitrous oxide in labour analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 453-458.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00639.x

97. ISMAIL MT, HASSANIN MZ. Neuraxial analgesia versus intravenous remifentanil for pain relief in early labor in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 1375-1381.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2459-3

98. BLAIR JM, HILL DA, FEE JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 415-420.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.3.415

99. BUEHNER U, BROADBENT JR, CHESTERFIELD B. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a complete audit cycle. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 666-670.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1103900421

100. DOUMA MR, MIDDELDORP JM, VERWEY RA, DAHAN A, STIENSTRA R. A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011; 20: 118-123.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.11.009

101. HINOVA A, FERNANDO R. Systemic remifentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1925-1929.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c03e0c

102. STOURAC P, SUCHOMELOVA H, STODULKOVA M, HUSER M, KRIKAVA J, JANKU P et al. Comparison of parturient - controlled remifentanil with epidural bupivacain and sufentanil for labour analgesia: Randomised controlled trial. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2014; 158: 227-232.

https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.073

103. FRAMBACH T, WIRBELAUER J, SCHELLING P, RIEGER L, MUELLENBACH RM, ROEWER N et al. [Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil as an alternative to epidural analgesia during labor: case series and discussion of medicolegal aspects]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2010; 214: 145-150.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255025

104. TVEIT TO, HALVORSEN A, SEILER S, ROSLAND JH. Efficacy and side effects of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia used in a stepwise approach for labour: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 19-25.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.09.003

105. TVEIT TO, SEILER S, HALVORSEN A, ROSLAND JH. Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 129-136.

https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834dfa98

106. FREEMAN LM, BLOEMENKAMP KW, FRANSSEN MT, PAPATSONIS DN, HAJENIUS PJ, VAN HUIZEN ME et al. Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2012; 12: 63.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-63

107. KRANKE P, GIRARD T, LAVAND'HOMME P, MELBER A, JOKINEN J, MUELLENBACH RM et al. Must we press on until a young mother dies? Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour may not be suited as a "poor man's epidural". BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2013; 13: 139.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-139

108. FONTAO RODRIGUEZ FE. Tres casos de sedación y analgesia con propofol y remifentanilo para el trabajode parto. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2003; 50: 418-422.

109. SMITH CA, COLLINS CT, CYNA AM, CROWTHER CA. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD003521.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003521.pub2

110. HODNETT ED, DOWNE S, EDWARDS N, WALSH D. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD000012.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub2

111. CLUETT ER, BURNS E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD000111.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3

112. SIMKIN PP, O'HARA M. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S131-S159.

https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.122382

113. GILBERT RE, TOOKEY PA. Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey. BMJ 1999; 319: 483-487.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7208.483

114. ADACHI K, SHIMADA M, USUI A. The relationship between the parturient's positions and perceptions of labor pain intensity. Nurs Res 2003; 52: 47-51.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200301000-00007

115. ATWOOD RJ. Parturitional posture and related birth behavior. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1976; 57: 1-25.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016347609156455

116. CARLSON JM, DIEHL JA, SACHTLEBEN-MURRAY M, MCRAE M, FENWICK L, FRIEDMAN EA. Maternal position during parturition in normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 443-447.

117. ROSSI MA, LINDELL SG. Maternal positions and pushing techniques in a nonprescriptive environment. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1986; 15: 203-208.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1986.tb01387.x

118. RAGNAR I, ALTMAN D, TYDEN T, OLSSON SE. Comparison of the maternal experience and duration of labour in two upright delivery positions--a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006; 113: 165-170.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00824.x

119. PHUMDOUNG S, GOOD M. Music reduces sensation and distress of labor pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2003; 4: 54-61.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1524-9042(02)54202-8

120. GEDEN EA, LOWER M, BEATTIE S, BECK N. Effects of music and imagery on physiologic and self-report of analogued labor pain. Nurs Res 1989; 38: 37-41.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198901000-00008

121. BURNS EE, BLAMEY C, ERSSER SJ, BARNETSON L, LLOYD AJ. An investigation into the use of aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice. J Altern Complement Med 2000; 6: 141-147.

https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2000.6.141

122. BURNS E, ZOBBI V, PANZERI D, OSKROCHI R, REGALIA A. Aromatherapy in childbirth: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2007; 114: 838-844.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01381.x

123. KETTERHAGEN D, VANDEVUSSE L, BERNER MA. Self-hypnosis: alternative anesthesia for childbirth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2002; 27: 335-340; quiz 41.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200211000-00007

124. DOWSWELL T, BEDWELL C, LAVENDER T, NEILSON JP. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD007214.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007214.pub2

125. BUNDSEN P, PETERSON LE, SELSTAM U. Pain relief in labor by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. A prospective matched study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981; 60: 459-468.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348109155461

126. THOMAS IL, TYLE V, WEBSTER J, NEILSON A. An evaluation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief in labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28: 182-189.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1988.tb01660.x

Descargas

Publicado

2014-11-24

Cómo citar

1.
Ortíz-Gómez JR, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Fornet-Ruiz I. Técnicas analgésicas para el parto: alternativas en caso de fallo de la epidural. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 24 de noviembre de 2014 [citado 16 de julio de 2025];37(3):411-27. Disponible en: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/28339

Número

Sección

Revisiones

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.