Modelo de instrumento de avaliação para técnicas básicas de saque, golpes de forehand e backhand, voleios de forehand e backhand baseados no “método de sotaques” para jovens tenistas na região de Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v59.103223Palavras-chave:
avaliações autênticas, técnica básica de tênis, método acentosResumo
Para avaliar as habilidades técnicas básicas de saque, golpe de forehand, golpe de backhand, voleio de forehand e voleio de backhand, é necessário um instrumento de avaliação apropriado e preciso de acordo com a situação real do jogo de tênis. O objetivo desta pesquisa é desenvolver um modelo de instrumento de avaliação das 5 técnicas básicas baseadas no método de sotaques para jovens tenistas da região de Yogyakar-ta. O desenho para desenvolver o instrumento de avaliação aplica o modelo de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento 4D (Definir, Desenhar, Desenvolver e Difundir). A abordagem aplicada foi quantitativa e qualitativa (método misto). Os sujeitos da pesquisa envolveram 25 jovens tenistas da província de Yogyakarta com menos de 18 anos de idade em Yogyakarta, incluindo: 15 tenistas do sexo masculino e 10 tenistas do sexo feminino. Os tenistas juniores utilizados como sujeitos da pesquisa são tenistas juniores que participam ativamente de partidas de tênis juniores em Yogyakarta e do Campeonato Nacional de Tênis. O teste de validade de conteúdo foi baseado no índice de validade de conteúdo (CVR), enquanto o teste de confiabilidade foi baseado na análise de consistência estatística Alpha Cronbach usando o aplicativo SPSS do pacote do programa geno-va, enquanto o coeficiente de confiabilidade interavaliadores foi analisado usando ANOVA. . Os resultados mostraram que o instrumento de avaliação apresentou validade de conteúdo muito boa, que foi: 0,71-1,00 (>0,50): 0,71-1,00 (>0,50), o nível de viabilidade do instrumento de avaliação é bom e o coeficiente de confiabilidade interavaliador alto . = 0,866 - 0,902 (r = ≥ 0,80). Además, se desarrollaron exitosamente los factores e indicadores de instrumentos de evaluación para técnicas básicas de servi-cio, golpe de fondo de derecha y revés, volea de derecha y revés basados en el método de acentos, que consisten en: (1) autoconfian- za y juego mental/psicología, ( 2) antes de ejecutar el golpe/etapa: percepción y decisión, (3) la ejecución del golpe y el resulta-do/etapa: ejecución y retroalimentación, y (4) la actitud y comportamiento al jogar tênis. Portanto, pode-se concluir que o instrumento de avaliação de técnicas básicas de serviço, golpe de fundo de forehand e backhand, voleio de forehand e backhand baseado no método de acentos pode ser utilizado como instrumento de avaliação de técnicas básicas para tenistas juvenis da região de Yogyakarta.
Palavras-chave: avaliações, técnica básica de tênis, método de acentos
Referências
Asencio, M. A., Garcia, G. M. G., F., G. J. P., & Antunes, R. M. (2022). Variability and specificity training programs: Differences in backhand stroke of amateur tennis players. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 45, 306–317.
Bakhtiar, S., & Ballard, R. J. (2015). Teori Actions Method, Strength Condition, dan Penerapannya dalam Pembinaan Prestasi Tenis. Malang: Wineka Media.
Best, K. J., Kahn, J. W., V., J., & Arbind. (2010). Research in Education (10th ed.). India: PHI Learning Private Limited.
Borg, R. W., & Gall, D. M. (2003). Education Research. New York. Interstate Book Manufactures.
Budi, D. R. Syafei M., Nanang H. K., Suhartoyo T., Hidayat R., & Deri Listiandi, A. (2020). The significance of exercise method on forehand and backhand groundstroke skills improvement in tennis. Jurnal SPORTIF: Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 6(1), 132–144.
Cayer, L. (1988). Mini Tennis/Novice Tennis Instructor. Canada: National Coaching Certification System.
Cow, J. W., Knudson, D. V., T., & Andrew, D., P., S. (2007). Pre- and post-impact muscle activation in the tennis volley: effects of ball speed, ball size and side of the body. BMJ British Journal of Sport Medicine, 41(11).
Currell, K. & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2008). Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity of Measures of Sporting Performance. Sport Medicine.
Damiant, P., F. T. D., & Cristian, P. (2021). The importance of tennis service and its learning method. Science, Movement and Health, 21(2), 427 – 431.
Egido, J. H. G., Toro, E. O., Palao, J. M., Conesa, I. V, & Luque, G. T. (2020). Effect of Modification Rules in Competition on Technical–Tactical Action in Young Tennis Players (Under-10). Fontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02789.
Fagundes, F. M., Lacambra, C. M., Santandreu, C. S., & Burgues, P. L. (2024). Scientific production on the application of comprehensive models in net sports: a systematic review. 52, 421–431.
Fresneda, A. G., Muñoz-Arroyave, V., Iglesias-Reig, X., Theodorou, A., Suárez-Iglesias, D., & Pardo-Fernández, A. (2023). Development, content validity and reliability of the SOCTOD-BSR observation instrument for analysing actions in wheelchair basketball. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 49, 87–96.
Georgakis, S., Wilson, R., & Evans, J. R. (2015). assessment in physical education: A case study of games sense pedagogy. The Physical Journal Pedagogy, 72, 67–86.
Hambali, B., Hidayat, Y., Yudiana, Y., Juliantine, T., Rahmat, A., Gumilar, A., & & Nugraha, R. (2021). Performance Assessment Instrument Model in Defensive Lob Learning for Elementary School Students. TEGAR: Journal of Teaching Physical Education in Elementary School, 4(2), 88–95.
Hambali, B., Hidayat, Y., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Predictive Validity of Badminton Basic Skills Learning Outcome Instrument Test Based on Gender. 21, 373–375.
Haryanto, J., Edmizal, E., Meyfitri F., Patino, B. B., Haji, J., & Drenowatz, C. (2023). Validity and reliability of topspin accuracy tests in table tennis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12), 371–377.
Haywood, K. M. (1997). Assessment of Movement Requires a Developmental Approach: Mo. J. Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. 7, 3–15.
Hidayatullah, M. F. (2021). Learner Centered and Open Skill Approach (LCOSA) in Physical Activity Learning. Surakarta: FKOR UNS.
Hung Tu, J., Feng Lin, Y., & Chen Chin, S. (2010). The influence of ball velocity and court illumination on reaction time for tennis volley. Journal of Sport Science & Medicine, 9(1), 56–61.
Kutlu, M., Yapici, H., & Demirkan, E. (2014). Reliability and Validity of New Test on Agility and Skill for Children Soccer Players. Central European Journal of Sport Science and Medicine, 6(2), 5–12.
Larson, Emma J., Guggenheimer, & J. D. (2013). The Effect of Scaling Tennis Equipment on The Forehand Groundstroke Performance of Children. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine.
Lin Tai, M., Ju Yang, C., Tzu Taang, W., Elliot, B., & Lung Chang, K. (2022). Upper extremity muscle activation during drive volley and groundstroke for two-handed backhand of female tennis players. Journal of Sport Science & Medicine, 21(4), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.586.
Llerena, A. M., Blanco, P. C., & Hernández, E. H. (2020). Design, validation, and reliability of an instrument to assess tactical behaviors in volleyball initiation. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 38, 661–666.
Lund, J. (2013). Assessment: its Development and Aplications. 68(7). https://doi.org/doi/abs/10.1080/07303084.1997.10604979.
Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2010). Performance Based Assessment for Middle and High School Physical Education. USA: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Lutfi, N., Suherman, A., Subarjah, H., & Budian, D. (2018). Validity and Reliability of Physical Education Learning Motivation Questionnaires. Advances in Health Sciences Research, 11.
Mahedero, P., Calderón, A., Arias-Estero, J. L., Hastie, P. A., & Guarino, A. J. (2015). Effects Of Student Skill Level on Knowledge, Decision Making, Skill Execution and Game Performance in A Mini-Volleyball Sport Education Season. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(4), 626–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0061.
Martin, J. J., McCaught, N., Sara Flory, S., Murphy, A., & Wisdom, K. (2013). Validity and Reliability of the School Physical Activity Environment Questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Educat Ion and Exercise Science, 15(4), 274–282. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2011.611462.
Medina, C., S., B., & Janssen, I. (2013). Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire among adults in Mexico. International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Mexico, 34(1).
Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurement in Research: Validity and Reliability. Munich Personal RePEc Archive., 17(3), 58–82.
Morrow Jr, J. R., Mood, D., Disch, J., & Kang, M. (2015). Measurement and evaluation in human performance, 5E. Human Kinetics.
Mueller, J. (2009). Assessment Toolbox. Nort Central College.
Ngatman, Alim, A., & Yuliarto, H. (2022). Developing a Learning Model on Basic Techniques Forehand and Backhand Voli in Field Tennis Based on Integrated Training Approach for Junior Tennis Players Aged 8-12 Years. 2642–2648. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2022.1135
Ngatman, Guntur, Danang, P. ., S., N., & Sunaryo. (2023). Test of Validity, Reliability and Relevance of the “ITN 10.3 ITF Test” On the Level of Basic Technical Ability in Forehand and Backhand Groundstrokes for Tennis Players Aged 12 Years and Under. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis. https://doi.org/DOI: -10.47191/ijmra
Ngatman, Guntur, Gani, I., & Danang, P. B. (2023). Tennis Training Model to Improve Groundstroke Skills in Children. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i1.47414.
Ngatman, Sumaryanto, Gani, I., & Solikhin, M. N. (2024). Improving the Basic Groundstroke Forehand and Backhand Techniques of Male Beginners Aged 8-12 through the ACENTOS Method-Based Training Model. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2024.120201
Nieto, T. F., Víctor M. López-Pastor, V. M., & Palacios-Picos, A. (2022). A combination of transformative and assessment through ICT in Physical Education. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 44, 728–738.
Nitko, J. A., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational Assessment for Students. New Jersey: Merill Prentice Hall.
Novick, A. (1988). Coach 1 Assistant Coach (The Actions Method). Canada: National Coaching Certification Program.
Pankhurst, A. (2013). How Tennis Players Learn Motor Skills: Some Consideration (ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review 2013. United Kingdom: International Tennis Federation.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice . ((3rd ed)). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Raiola, G., D’Elia, F., & Altavilla, G. (2018). Physical activity and sports sciences between European Research Council and academic disciplines in Italy.
Raymond, J. E., Homer, S. E., Smith, R., & Gray, J. E. (2013). Learning through assessment: An evaluation of a new development in the undergraduate midwifery curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 471–476. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/ j.nepr. 2012.10.006 PMID:23140801.
Rismayanthi, C., Sugiyanto, Kristiyanto, A., & Doewes, M. (2020). Validity and Reliability Test of The Physical Exercise Movements Screening to Improve Fitness for Elderly.
Sawali, L., & H., R. U. (2020). Effectiveness of training programs to improve tennis service skills. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan., 5(2).
Sewagegn, A. & Diale, B. M. (2020). Assessment as a Tool to Enhance Student Learning in a Higher Education Institution: Implication for Student Competency.
Strand, Bradford N., Wilson, R. (1993). Assesing Sport Skills. Human Kinetics Publishers.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan Research and Development Untuk Bidang: Pendidikan, Manajemen, Sosial, Teknik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukadji, S. (2000). Menyusun dan Mengevaluasi Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Susiono, R., Sugiyanto, F. X., Lumintuarso, R., Tomoliyus, Sukamti, E. R., Fauzi, Hariono, A., & Prabowo, T. A. (2024). Agility Test Innovation on Special Badminton Athletes for the Junior Category (U17): Validity and Reliability. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 547–553.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Qustionaire/Survey in Research.
Teknik-Teknik Dasar dan “Actions Method” Dalam Tenis (Cara Efektif Mengajar dan Melatih Tenis Tingkat Pemula). (2020). UNY Press.
Tomoliyus, Sumaryanti, & Jatmika, H. M. (2016). Development of Validity and Reliability of Net Game Performance-Based Assessment on Elementary Students’ Achievement in Physical Education. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education, 6, 41–49.
Unierzyski, Piotr & Crespo, M. (2007). Review of Modern Teaching Methods for Tennis. International Journal of Sport Science, Vol. III A.
Utomo, N. S., Sulaiman, & Nasuka. (2019). The Influence of Volley Training Method and Agility on Tennis Players Backhand Volley Accuracy. Journal of Physical Education and Sports., 8(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/jpes.v8i2.27303.
Veal, M. (1992). The Role of Assessment in Secondary in Physical Education: A Pedagogical View. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63(7), 88–92.
Villouta, P. L., Ribeiro, I. L., Casanova, C. F., Gomes, J. V., Rivera, C., F., & Vitoria, R. F. (2022). Intra-rater and intraday test-retest reliability for physical performance tests in young Chilean tennis players.
Yaakop, N., Koh, D., & Yasin, R. M. (2023). A Content Validation of Focus Group Discussions Based on Need Analysis in a Physical Education Training Module for Primary School Teachers. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF), 50, 1115-1122.
Yudiana, Y., Sucipto, Hidayat, Y., & Hambali, B. (2022). Student Performance Analysis in Volleyball Learning: The Use of a Modified Volleyball Information System Application. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(5), 913–921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2022.100507
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Retos
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e assegurar a revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação da obra como licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite que outros para compartilhar o trabalho com o crédito de autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os autores podem estabelecer acordos adicionais separados para a distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicado na revista (por exemplo, a um repositório institucional, ou publicá-lo em um livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- É permitido e os autores são incentivados a divulgar o seu trabalho por via electrónica (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou no seu próprio site), antes e durante o processo de envio, pois pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como a uma intimação mais Cedo e mais do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) (em Inglês).
Esta revista é a "política de acesso aberto" de Boai (1), apoiando os direitos dos usuários de "ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar, ou link para os textos completos dos artigos". (1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
