The three-axes model of planning in physical education (El modelo de planificación de tres ejes en Educación Física)

Autores/as

  • Jesús Viciana Universidad de Granada
  • Daniel Mayorga-Vega

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i33.54533

Palabras clave:

planning physical education, program, decision-making process, physical educators, physical education teachers (Planificación de la Educación Física, programación, toma de decisiones, educadores físicos, profesores de Educación Física)

Resumen

The high complexity of planning Physical Education is due to the great quantity of factors that influence its process. Consequently, many doubts appear in the decision-making process of any formational stage of Physical Education teachers. There is a lack of theoretical-practical tools that help teachers to be their own constructors of their curriculum by helping them to design their own proposals, instead of using proposals made by others. The main purpose of this study was to provide Physical Education teachers a theoretical and practical framework, which will guide them in the decisional making process during planning, in order to include in their teaching all the influential factors that need to be taken into account. The three-axes model of planning is discussed as a guide for planning Physical Education, helping teachers through practical recommendations and proposing strategies in each axis in order to prepare an effective Physical Education planning.


Resumen. La alta complejidad de la planificación de la Educación Física radica en la gran cantidad de factores que influyen en su proceso. Debido a ello, aparecen numerosas dudas en el proceso de toma de decisiones y en cualquier etapa de formación del docente de Educación Física. En determinados aspectos de la enseñanza como la planificación, existe una falta de herramientas teórico-prácticas que ayuden a los profesores a ser constructores de sus propios currículos, que les ayuden a diseñar sus propias propuestas curriculares y evitar así el uso descontextualizado de propuestas hechas por terceros. El principal propósito de este artículo es proporcionar a los profesores de Educación Física un marco teórico y práctico sobre el que basar y guiar sus decisiones de planificación cuando estén preparando sus currículos específicos, incluyendo así todos los factores influyentes que necesitan tener en cuenta en su enseñanza de la Educación Física. El modelo de tres ejes de la planificación es discutido como una guía para planificar la Educación Física, una ayuda de profesores a través de recomendaciones prácticas, y además propone estrategias en cada eje del modelo para preparar un plan efectivo de Educación Física.

Biografía del autor/a

Jesús Viciana, Universidad de Granada

Profesor Titular de Universidad desde 2000. Director del Departamento de EF y Deportiva de la Universidad de Granada de 2001-2009.

Citas

American Association of Health Physical Education Recreation and Dance (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co Inc.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32−42.

Bulger, S. M., & Housner, L. D. (2009). Relocating from easy street: Strategies for moving physical education forward. Quest, 61, 442-469. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2009.10483625

Çakmak, M. (2010). Novice teachers’ thoughts on teaching strategies in initial years of teaching: a case study. Helsinki, Finland: European Educational Research Association.

Çakmak, M. (2013). Learning from teaching experiences: novice teachers’ thoughts. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], Special issue (1), 55-67.

Cloes, M. (2017). Preparing physically educated citizens in Physical Education. Expectations and practices. Retos, 31, 245-251.

Cocca, A., Liukkonen, J., Mayorga-Vega, D., & Viciana, J. (2014). Health-related physical activity levels in Spanish youth and young adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 118(1), 247-260. doi: 10.2466/10.06.PMS.118k16w1

Ennis, C. D. (2011). Physical education curriculum priorities: Evidence for education and skilfulness. Quest, 63(1), 5-18.

Fey, J. (2011). Dance Units for Middle Schools. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Fernández-Río, J. & Méndez-Giménez, A. (2016). El aprendizaje cooperativo: Modelo pedagógico para Educación Física. Retos, 29, 201-206.

Goh, C. T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking Schools, Learning Nation. Speech presented at the opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking, June 6, Singapore.

González Luccini, F. (1991). Los objetivos educativos II. Documento 9 para la Reforma. Madrid: MEC.

Gutiérrez-Díaz del Campo, D., García-López, L. M., Pastor-Vicedo, J. C., Romo-Pérez, V., Eirín-Nemiña, R., & Fernández-Bustos G. 2017). Percepción del profesorado sobre la contribución, dificulatdes e importancia de la Educación Física en el enfoque por competencias. Retos, 31, 34-39.

Julián, J. A., Abarca-Sos, A., Zaragoza, J., & Aibar, A. (2016). Análisis critico del curriculum básico de la LOMCE para la asignatura de Educación Física. Acciones derivadas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón y propuestas de futuro. Retos, 29, 173-181.

Krathwol, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.

Kullina, P. H., & Krause, J. (2001). Teaching students to achieve and maintain a health-enhancing levels of physical fitness. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 72(8), 30-33.

Larraz, A. (2009). ¿Qué aprendizajes de educación física debería tener el alumnado al finalizar sexton curso de primaria? Tándem, 29, 45-63.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press.

Le Ny, J. F. (1980). Le conditionnement et l’apprentissage [The conditioning and the learning]. Paris, France: PUF.

Liersch, S., Henze, V., Röbl, M., Schnitzerling, J., Suermann, T., Mayr, E., Krauth, C., & Walter, U. (2011). Forty-five minutes of physical activity at school each day? Curricular promotion of physical activity in grades one to four. Journal of Public Health, 19(4), 329-338.

López-Pastor, V. M., Ruano, C., Hernangómez, A., Cabello, A. M., Hernández, B., Sánchez, B. et al. (2016). Veinte años de formación permanente del profesorado, investigación-acción y programación por dominios de acción motriz. Retos, 29, 270-279.

MacPhail, A., & Tannehill, D. (2012). Helping pre-service and beginning teachers examine and reframe assumptions about themselves as teachers and change agents: “Who is going to listen to you anyway?” Quest, 64(4), 299-312. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2012.706885

Mavrek, S., Pieters, L., Peterson-Pressler, L., Bentley, T., & Cameron, J. L. (2011). Ideas Exchange: National Standards for Physical Education are used to develop physically-educated individuals who have the knowledge, skills, and confidence to enjoy lifelong healthy physical activity. How do the Standards play a role in your daily PE program? Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 24(4), 6-9.

Maxwell, B. (2010). In-service initial teacher education in the learning and skills sector in England: Integrating course and workplace learning. Vocations and Learning, 3, 185-202.

Mayorga-Vega, D., Viciana, J., & Cocca, A. (2013). Effects of a circuit training program on muscular and cardiovascular endurance and their maintenance in schoolchildren. Journal of Human Kinetics, 37(1), 153−160. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0036

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.

Miklos, T. (1999). Educación y capacitación basada en competencias [Education and capacitation based on competencies]. Mexico: Limusa.

Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1995). Authentic Pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 8, 1-12.

Ortega, F., Konstabel, K., Pasquali, E., Ruiz, J., Hurtig-Wennölf, A., Mäestu, J., Löf, J., Harro, J., Bellocco, R., Labayen, I., Veidebaum, T., & Sjöström, M. (2013). Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: a cohort study. Plos One, 8(4), e60871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060871

Ortega, F., Ruiz, J., Castillo, M., & Sjöström, M. (2008). Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. International Journal of Obesity, 32(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774

Pulido, J. J., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., González-Ponce, I., & García-Calvo, T. (2016). Proyecto MOVIL-IZATE: Fomento de la actividad física en escolares mediante las Apps móviles. Retos, 30, 3-8.

Redelius, K., & Hay, P. J. (2012). Student views on criterion-referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 211-225. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2010.548064

Redmon, K., Foran, A., & Dwyer, S. (2010). Quality lesson plans for outdoor education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Rovegno, I. (2006). Situated perspectives on learning. In D. Kirk, D. Mcdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.) The Handbook of Physical Education (pp. 262−274). London, England: Sage publications.

Salvador, C., Chiva, O., & Fazio, A. (2016). Características del aprendizaje integrado de contenidos de Educación Física y Lengua extranjera. Retos, 29, 120-125.

Sáenz-López, P., Almagro, B. J., & Ibáñez, S. (2011). Describing Problems Experienced by Spanish Novice Physical Education Teachers. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 4, 1-9. doi: 10.2174/1875399X01104010001

Sánchez-Bañuelos, F. (1984). Bases para una didáctica de la Educación Física. Madrid: Gymnos.

Siedentop, D., & Tanehill, D. (2000). Developing teaching skills in physical education (4th ed). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.

Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport (2015). Royal Decree 1105/2014 laying down the curriculum for Secondary Education and Baccalaureate. Goverment Gazette, 3, 480-486.

Squires, D. A. (2009). Curriculum alignment: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. California: Sage Publications.

Thorburn, M., Jess, M., & Atencio, M. (2009). Connecting policy aspirations with principled progress? An analysis of current Physical Education challenge in Scotland. Irish Educational Studies, 28(2), 209-223.

Van Acker, R., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., De Martelaer, K., Seghers, J., Kirk, D., Haerens, L., De Cocker, K., & Cardon, G. (2012). Framework for physical activity programs within school-community partnerships. Quest, 63, 300-320. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483683

Verkhoshansky, Y., & Verkhoshansky, N. (2011). Special strength training. Manual for coaches. Rome, Italy: Verkhoshansky SSTM.

Viciana, J. (2002). Planificar en Educación Física [Planning in Physical Education]. Barcelona, Spain: INDE.

Viciana, J. & Zabala, M. (2004). Un estudio descriptivo sobre cómo planifican los profesores de Educación Física. In M.A. González, A. Sánchez, & J. Gómez (Eds.) International Congress of AIESEP 2002. Preparación profesional y necesidades sociales (pp. 732-739). A Coruña, Spain: AIESEP.

Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2013a). Effect of internship on pre-service teachers’ conceptions of planning in Physical Education. European Scientific Journal, 9(19), 253-261.

Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2013b). Análisis del cambio curricular de LOGSE a LOE en la Educación Física de Primaria. [Analysis of the change in the educational law in Primary Physical Education (from LOGSE to LOE laws)]. Profesorado, Revista de curriculo y formación del profesorado, 17(3), 257-271.

Viciana, J., Mayorga-Vega, D., & Cocca, A. (2013). Effects of a maintenance resistance training program on muscular strength in schoolchildren. Kinesiology, 45(1), 82-91.

Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2016). Innovatives teaching units applied to Physical Education. Changing the curriculum management for authentic outcomes. Kinesiology, 48(1), 142-152.

Viciana, J., Mayorga-Vega, D., & Merino-Marban, R. (2014). Physical Education-based planning for developing and maintaining students’ health-related physical fitness levels. In R. Todaro (Ed.) Handbook of Physical Education Research. Role of School Programs, Children’s attitudes and Health Implications (pp. 237-252). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Viciana, J., Salinas, F., & Cocca, A. (2007). Análisis de contenido comparativo del primer nivel curricular de EF en Secundaria. Profesorado [Comparative content analysis of the first level of PE curriculum in Secondary educational stage]. Revista de Curriculum y formación del profesorado, 11(2), 1-13.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press.

Whitley, M. A., Forneris, T., & Barker, B. (2014). The reality of evaluating sport and physical activity programs to enhance the development of underserved youth: challenges and potential strategies. Quest, 66(2), 218. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2013.872043

Wilmore, J. H., & Costill, D. L. (2005). Physiology of Sport and Exercise: 3rd Edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kine

Descargas

Publicado

2018-01-01

Cómo citar

Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2018). The three-axes model of planning in physical education (El modelo de planificación de tres ejes en Educación Física). Retos, 33, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i33.54533

Número

Sección

Revisiones teóricas, sistemáticas y/o metaanálisis

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a