Evaluation of health information about the influenza vaccine on internet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0323Keywords:
Influenza vaccines. Internet. Information. Evaluation.Abstract
Background. The quality of health information on internet is a question of concern to governments and users. Our aim was to determine the extent to which information about the influenza vaccine adheres to the gold standard set by the Spanish Health Ministry.
Methods. Between June and July 2014 information on indications, adverse effects and counter-indications of the vaccine was evaluated to see if it adhered to this gold standard. This information was obtained through Google, using terms provided by medical students. A univariate analysis was performed, where the variable result was getting information that adhered correctly to the standard, and explanatory variables were the type of origin of the information and its country.
Results. Using the terms provided by 104 students, we obtained 134 different web links. Adhesion reached 65.7% (88/134) with respect to indication in health workers (HW). Nineteen point four percent provided incorrect information on indication in pregnant women. There was significantly better adherence in the information from official public health bodies (indication in HW (OR: 2.6), pregnant women (OR: 5.4) and immunodepressed patients (OR: 2.2)). Adherence of information on Spanish web links was worse (indication in pregnancy (OR: 0.3) and counter-indication if allergic to eggs (OR: 0.5)).
Downloads
References
1. Fox S. Health information is a popular pursuit online. Pew Research Internet Project. [Consultado 10-08-2014]: Disponible en: http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/02/01/health-information-is-a-popular-pursuit-online/.
2. TUELLS J, CABALLERO P, NOLASCO A, MONTAGUD E. Factores asociados a la predisposición a vacunarse contra la gripe pandémica A/H1N1 en población adulta del Departamento de Salud de Elche (España). Influencia de las fuentes de información. An Sist Sanit Navar 2012; 35: 251-260.
https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272012000200007
3. COUPER MP, SINGER E, LEVIN CA, FOWLER FJ JR, FAGERLIN A, ZIKMUND-FISHER BJ. Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010; 30 (5 Suppl): 106S-114S.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10377661
4. MAYER MA, LEIS A, SANZ F. Información sobre salud en internet y sellos de confianza como indicadores de calidad: el caso de las vacunas. Aten Primaria 2009; 41: 534-542.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.003
5. CLINE RJ, HAYNES KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 671-692.
https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.671
6. BETSCH C, WICKER S. E-health use, vaccination knowledge and perception of own risk: drivers of vaccination uptake in medical students. Vaccine 2012; 30: 1143-1148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.021
7. MADDEN K1, NAN X, BRIONES R, WAKS L. Sorting through search results: a content analysis of HPV vaccine information online. Vaccine 2012; 30: 3741-3746.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.025
8. SCULLARD P, PEACOCK C, DAVIES P. Googling children's health: reliability of medical advice on the internet. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95: 580-582.
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.168856
9. HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍA I. GONZÁLEZ-CELADOR R, GIMÉNEZ-JÚLVEZ MT. Intención de los estudiantes de medicina de vacunarse contra la gripe en su futuro ejercicio profesional. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2014; 88: 407-418.
https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272014000300010
10. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Prevención de la Gripe. Vacunación antigripal. [Consultado 01-06-2014]: Disponible en: https://www.msssi.gob.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfTransmisibles/gripe/gripe.htm#prevencion.
11. MARTÍNEZ-BAZ I, DÍAZ-GONZÁLEZ J, GUEVARA M, TOLEDO D, ZABALA A, DOMÍNGUEZ A et al. Actitudes, percepciones y factores asociados a la vacunación antigripal en los profesionales de atención primaria de Navarra, 2011-2012. An Sist Sanit Navar 2013; 36: 263-273.
https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000200009
12. HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍA I, CARDOSO-MUÑOZ A, MORENO-PASCUAL C, SÁENZ-GONZÁLEZ MC. Razones de los estudiantes sanitarios para tener intención de vacunarse o no de gripe cuando sean trabajadores sanitarios. Enferm Clin 2011; 21: 300-301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.05.005
13. COVOLO L, MASCARETTI S, CARUANA A, ORIZIO G, CAIMI L, GELATTI U. How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 83.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-83
14. GALICIA-GARCÍA MD, GONZÁLEZ-TORGA A, GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ C, FUSTER-PÉREZ M, GARRIGÓS-GORDO I, LÓPEZ-FRESNEÑA N, et al. Vacunación de gripe en trabajadores sanitarios. Por qué se vacunan y por qué no se vacunan. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2006; 24: 413-417.
https://doi.org/10.1157/13091777
15. KATA A. A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 2010; 28: 1709-1716.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
16. BUENO CAMPAÑA M, GONZÁLEZ SPINOLA A, PARRA CUADRADO E, QUEVEDO TERUEL S, CALVO REY C. Vacunación antigripal en la embarazada. Prog Obstet Ginecol 2010; 53: 293-296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pog.2009.07.002
17. Asociación Española de Pediatría. Contraindicaciones de las vacunas. [Consultado 22-06-2014]: Disponible en: http://vacunasaep.org/profesionales/contraindicaciones-de-las-vacunas#contraind_p
18. MCTAVISH J, HARRIS R, WATHEN N. Searching for health: the topography of the first page. Ethics Inf Technol 2011; 13: 227-240.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9272-8
19. SEO Consultants Directory. Top Search Engines in the United Kingdom. [Consultado 03-06-2014]: Disponible en: http://www.seoconsultants.com/search-engines/uk/.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.


