QIIP - Questionnaire of interests for intergenerational practice

Susana Villas-Boas, José Tomás da Silva, Albertina Lima de Oliveira, Natália Ramos, Inmaculada Montero

Abstract


This article presents the validation study of the Questionnaire of interests for intergenerational practice (QIIP), which aims to contribute to the study of interests on a population level as well as supporting the development and implementation of intergenerational activities and programs through its identification. The design of the study is correlational and cross-generational. The QIIP was applied to 385 residents of Oporto, divided into three age groups. The instrument showed to be valid and revealed good internal consistency concerning the identification of the interests of the sample studied and can be analyzed either by dimension of interest, or by activity item of interest, depending on the goals of intergenerational practices that need to be developed. Upon analysis by dimension and age group, it was found that the Dimension Caring/Protecting and the Dimension Culture refer to common interests, shared among the three age groups. On the other hand, it was observed that the younger group differs from the other age groups in the Dimension Art and in the Dimension “Handiwork”, but no significant differences were found in both dimensions between middle-aged adults and older adults. In the Dimension Use of New Technologies, significant differences were registered among all age groups, decreasing in interest as the age increases.

Keywords


Interests; intergenerational practice; Intergenerational education; Ageing; QIIP

References


Abreu, M. V. (1985). Interesse. In Verbo (Ed.), Polis Enciclopédia Verbo da Sociedade e do Estado (pp. 642-648). Lisboa: Verbo.

Ainley, M. (2013). One ingredient in the mix: interest and psychological Well-being. In A. Efklides, A. & D. Moraitou, (Eds.), A positive psychology perspective on quality of life. (pp. 243-258). Dordrecht: Springer.

Betsworth, D. G., & Fouad, N. A. (1997). Vocational interests: A look at the past 70 years and a glance at the future. Career Development Quarterly, 46, 23-47.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: CBS College Publishing.

Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.

Fink, B. (1991). Interest development as structural change in person-object relationships. In L. Oppenheimer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The origins of action: Interdisciplinary and international perspectives (pp. 175-204). New York: Springer.

Harackiewic, J., & Hulleman, C. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Hilgenheger, N. (2010). Johann Herbart / Norbert Hilgenheger. J. E. Romão (Translation. & Org.). Recife: Fundação Joaquim Nabuco/Editora Massangana.

Kaplan, M., Sánchez, M., & Hoffman, J. (2017). Intergenerational pathways to a sustainable society. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47019-1

Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405-426). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Martin, K., Springate, I, & Atkinson, M. (2010). Intergenerational practice: Outcomes and effectiveness (LGA Research report). Slough: NFER. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/IPI01

Meir, E. I., & Gati, I. (1981). Guidelines for item selection in inventories yielding score profiles. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1011-1016.

Montero, I., & Gallego, A. (2002). Los programas intergeracionales: Una alternativa socio-educativa para todas las edades. In J. García & M. Bedmar (coord.), Hacia la Educación Intergeracional (pp. 167-177). Madrid: DyKinson.

O’Neill, P. (2016). Intergenerational gatherings among the water and willows. In M. Kaplan, L.L. Thang, M. Sánchez, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Intergenerational contact zones—A compendium of applications. University Park, PA: Penn State Extension. Retrieved from http://extension.psu.edu/youth/intergenerational/articles/intergenerational-contact-zones/recreation-china

Sánchez, M., & Díaz, P. (2005). Los programas intergeneracionales. In S. Pinazo & M. Sánchez (Dir.), Gerontología. Actualización, innovación y propuestas (pp. 393-430). Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hal.

Sánchez, M., Kaplan, M., & Sáez, J. (2010). Programas Intergeneracionales: Guía introductoria. Madrid: IMSERSO. Retrieved from http://www.imserso.es/imserso_01/documentacion/publicaciones/colecciones/informacion_publicacion/index.htm?id=54

Savickas, M. L., & Spokane, A. (Eds.) (1999). Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Springate, I., Atkinson, M., & Martin, K. (2008). Intergenerational practice: A review of the literature (LGA Research Report). Slough: NFER. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/LIG01/LIG01.pdf

Valsiner, J. (1992). Interest: A meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 27-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2019.33.07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DOI: 10.7179/PSRI

 

    

Licencia Creative Commons

Este obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España.

ISSN: 1139-1723

DOI: 10.7179/PSRI