Minimally invasive posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Prospective randomised trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0541Keywords:
Palabras clave. Prótesis total de cadera. Cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Abordaje posteriorAbstract
Backgrond. Our working hypothesis was that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure. We compared THR results in the minimally invasive posterior approach with THR results in the conventional posterior approach. Methods. Prospective, randomised trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on treatment (minimally invasive posterior approach or conventional posterior approach). Data collected: Perioperative bleeding, postoperative pain, time of recovery, component orientation, complications and functional results. One year follow-up. Results. No differences were found in blood loss, surgical time, component orientation, rate of complications or functional result. The minimally invasive lateral approach produced less postoperative pain and a faster recovery, with a shorter hospital stay and earlier walking-start, and a positive economic impact with 5% of the total process cost saved. Conclusions. Minimally invasive surgery permits less postoperative pain, faster recovery and a positive economic saving, without differences in the rest of the items studied.Downloads
References
1. INABA Y, DORR LD, WAN Z, SIRIANNI L, BOUTARY M. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005; 441: 104-114.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000193811.23706.3a
2. BERGER RA, JACOBS JJ, MENEGHINI RM, DELLA VALLE C, PAPROSKY W, ROSENBERG AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; 429: 239-223.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000150127.80647.80
3. HOWELL JR, GARBUZ DS, DUNCAN CP. Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin N Am 2004; 35: 107-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00112-3
4. MURPHY SB, ECKER TM, TANNAST M. THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006; 44: 160-167.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000246539.57198.29
5. O'BRIEN DAL, RORABECK CH. The mini-incision lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005; 441: 99-103.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000193812.31329.3a
6. MALIK A, DORR LD. The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2007; 463: 74-84.
https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181468766
7. CHIMENTO GF, PAVONE V, SHARROCK N, KAHN B, CAHILL J, SCULCO TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty-A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 139-144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061
8. GOLDSTEIN WM, BRANSON JJ, BERLAND KA, GORDON AC. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (Suppl 4): 33-38.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300004-00004
9. LABOVITCH RS, BOZIC KJ, HANSEN E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.019
10. SCULCO TP, JORDAN LC, WALTER WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin N Am 2004; 35: 16-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0
11. BARRACK RL, MILROY RD JR, HARRIS WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-years radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 385-389.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587883
12. SAHA S, HOERGER TJ, PIGNONE MP, TEUSTSCH SM, HELFAND M, MANDELBLATT JS, for the Cost Work Group of the Third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The art and science of incorporating cost effectiveness into evidence-based recommendations for clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 (Suppl 3): 36-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00260-4
13. DORR LD, MAHESHWARI AV, LONG WT, WAN Z, SIRIANNI LE. Early pain relief and fuction after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1153-1160.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200706000-00001
14. KIM YH. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique-A prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 1092-1098.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.015
15. BOTTNER FB, DELGADO S, SCULCO TP. Minimally invasive total hip replacement: the posterolateral approach. Am J Orthop 2006; 35: 218-224.
16. OGONDA L, WILSON R, ARCHBOLD P, LAWLOR M, HUMPHREYS P, O'BRIEN S et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes-A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87: 701-714.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200504000-00002
17. WOOLSON ST, MOW CS, SYQUIA JF, LANNIN JV, SCHURMAN DJ. Compasiron of primary total hip replacement performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1353-1358.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200407000-00001
18. PANISELLO-SEBASTIÁ JJ, CANALES-CORTÉS V, HERRERO-BARCOS L, HERRERA-RODRÍGUEZ A, MATEO-AGUDO J, MARÍNEZ-MARTÍN AA. Efectividad de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de incisión única postero-lateral en artroplastia total de cadera. Rev Ortop Traumatol 2006; 21: 425-430.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0482-5985(06)75303-2
19. CHUNG WK, LIU D, FOO LSS. Mini-incision total hip replacement-Surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg 2004; 12: 19-24.
https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900401200105
20. NAKAMURA S, MATSUDA K, ARAI N, WAKIMOTO N, MATSUSHITA T. Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2004; 28: 214-217.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0570-1
21. CHIMENTO GF, PAVONE V, SHARROCK N, KAHN B, CAHILL J, SCULCO TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty-A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 139-144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061
22. KHAN RJK, FICK D, KHOO P, YAO F, NIVBRANT B, WOOD D. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty-Description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 1038-1046.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.010
23. GOLDSTEIN WM, BRANSON JJ, BERLAND KA, GORDON AC. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (Suppl 4): 33-38.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300004-00004
24. WENZ JF, GURKAN I, JIBODH SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 1031-1043.
https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20021001-14
25. WRIGHT JM, CROCKETT HC, DELGADO S, LYMAN S, MADSEN M, SCULCO TP. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty-A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 538-544.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.070
26. LAWLOR M, HUMPHREYS P, MORROW E, OGONDA L, BENNETT D, ELLIOTT D. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 465-474.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
