Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the oral assessment guide (OAG) in cancer patients

Authors

  • C. Oroviogoicoechea Universidad de Navarra
  • A. Carvajal Universidad de Navarra
  • M.A. Soteras Universidad de Navarra
  • E. Beortegui Universidad de Navarra
  • M.C. De la Hera Universidad de Navarra
  • M.A. Aznarez Enfermera del Departamento de Oncología de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0071

Keywords:

Validation. Reliability. Psychometric aspects. Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). Cancer.

Abstract

Background. The Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) is a widely used tool designed for evaluating problems of oral mucous in cancer patients, but it has not been validated in Spanish. The aim of this work is to translate and validate into Spanish the scale of the OAG designed by Eilers.

Method. The translation process was carried out using the method of back-translation by bilingual translators. The study was carried out with cancer patients, both outpatient and inpatients, of the Hematology/Oncology Department and with oncology nurses. The following psychometric properties of the OAG were evaluated: internal consistency, concurrent validity with WHO’s mucositis scale, interjudge agreement between two different nurses. The perception of patients and nurses on the use of the OAG was also assessed.

Results. An adequate Spanish version of the OAG was obtained. All the participants (n=40) completed the study. Internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.71 and interjudge agreement obtained a moderate to good Kappa index in the majority of items (k=0.4-0.81), except in “tongue and gums” (k=0.33-0.37). Concurrent validity with WHO mucositis scale was acceptable (r=0.458). All the nurses (n=6) considered that the scale was easy to understand and useful in clinical practice. The patients said that oral evaluation with the scale did not cause them discomfort.

Conclusions. The Spanish version of the OAG is a valid and reliable instrument in cancer patients. It is a scale that is easy to use in clinical practice and is well accepted by patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

C. Oroviogoicoechea, Universidad de Navarra

Contratada doctor de la Facultad de Enfermeria por la Universidad de Navarra.

Es directora de Innovación e Investigación en Enfermería. Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona. España.

A. Carvajal, Universidad de Navarra

Contratada doctor de la Facultad de Enfermeria por la Universidad de Navarra. Imparto docencia en grado y postgrado en el ámbito de los Cuidados Paliativos

He realizado mi doctorado en la validación de una escala para valorar síntomas en pacientes con cáncer avanzado.

Soy revisora de la revista.

M.A. Soteras, Universidad de Navarra

Supervisora del Departamento de Oncología de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

E. Beortegui, Universidad de Navarra

Investigadora del Departamento de Innovación e Investigación en Enfermería. Clínica Universidad de Navarra.

M.C. De la Hera, Universidad de Navarra

Enfermera del Departamento de Oncología de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

References

1. QUINN B, STONE R, UHLENHOPP M, MCCANN S, BLIJLEVENS N. Ensuring accurate oral mucositis assessment in the European group for blood and marrow transplantation prospective oral mucositis audit. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2007; 11: S10-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-3889(07)70003-0

2. CHENG KK. Oral mucositis, dysfunction, and distress in patients undergoing cancer therapy. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 2114-2121.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01618.x

3. CAWLEY MM, BENSON LM. Current trends in managing oral mucositis. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2005; 9: 584-595.

https://doi.org/10.1188/05.CJON.584-592

4. RUBENSTEIN EB, PETERSON DE, SCHUBERT M, KEEFE D, MCGUIRE D, EPSTEIN J et al. Clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis. Cancer 2004; 100: 2026-2046.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20163

5. EILERS J, MILLION R. Prevention and management of oral mucositis in patients with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2007; 23: 201-212.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2007.05.005

6. STONE R, FLIEDNER MC, SOMIET A. Management of oral mucositis in patients with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005; 9: S24-32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2005.08.004

7. EILERS J, EPSTEIN JB. Assessment and measurement of oral mucositis. Semin Oncol Nurs 2004; 20: 22-29.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.soncn.2003.10.005

8. MADEYA M.L. Oral complications from cancer theraphy; nursing implications for assessment and treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 23: 808-820.

9. SONIS ST, ELTING LS, KEEFE D, PETERSON DE, SCHUBERT M, HAUER-JENSEN M et al. Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury. Cancer 2004; 100: 1995-2025.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20162

10. HOMSI J, WALSH D, RIVERA N, RYBICKI LA, NELSON KA, LEGRAND S et al. Symptom evaluation in palliative medicine: patient report vs systematic assessment. Support Care Cancer 2006; 14: 444-453.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0009-2

11. OHRN K, SJODÉN P. Experiences of care in patients with haematological malignancies or head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2003; 12: 274-282.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00417.x

12. EILERS J, BERGER AM, PETERSEN MC. Development, testing and application of the oral assessment guide. Oncol Nurs Forum 1988; 15: 325-330.

13. KOLBINSON DA, SCHUBERT MM, FLOURNOY N. Early oral changes following bone marrow transplantation. Oral Surgery 1988; 66: 130-138.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(88)90080-1

14. SCHUBERT MM, WILLIAMS BB, LLOID ME, DONALDSON G, CHAPKO MK. Clinical assessment scale for the rating of oral mucosal changes associated with bone marrow transplantation. Development of an oral mucositis index. Cancer 1992; 69: 2469-2477.

https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19920515)69:10<2469::AID-CNCR2820691015>3.0.CO;2-W

15. MCGUIRE DB, PETERSON DE, MULLER S, OWEN DC, SLEMMONS MF, SCHUBERT, MM. The 20 item oral mucositis index: reliability and validity in bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients. Cancer Invest 2002; 20: 893-903.

https://doi.org/10.1081/CNV-120005902

16. SONIS ST, EILERS JG, EPSTEIN JB, LEVEQUE FG, LIGGETT WH JR, MULAGHA MT et al. Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Mucositis Study Group. Cancer 1999; 85: 2103-2113.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2103::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-0

17. HOLMES S, MOUNTAIN E. Assessment of oral status: evaluation of three oral assessment guides. J Clin Nurs 1993; 2: 35-40.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1993.tb00128.x

18. GIBSON F, CARGILL J, ALLISON J, BEGENT J, COLE S, STONE J et al. Establising content validity of the oral assessment guide in children and young people. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 1817-1825.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.02.018

19. KNOOS M, OSTMAN M. Oral assessment guide-test of reliability and validity for patients receiving radiotherapy to the head and neck region. Eur J Cancer Care 2009; 19: 53-60.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00958.x

20. ANDERSSON P, PERSSON L, HALLBERG IR, RENVERT S. Testing an oral assessment guide during chemotherapy treatment in a Swedish care setting: a pilot study. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8: 150-158.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00237.x

21. D'ANGELO D, VELLONE E, SALVATORI C, DE MARINIS MG, ALVARO R. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the oral assessment guide. Prof Inferm 2013; 66: 117-124.

https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2013.662117

22. HUNT S, ALONSO J, BUCQUET D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 1991; 19: 33-44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(91)90072-6

23. ARGIMON JM, JIMÉNEZ J. Validación de cuestionarios. En: Argimon J, Jiménez J, editores. Métodos de investigación clínica y epidemiológica. Madrid: Elsevier; 2004. p 196-206.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-84-8174-709-6.50021-X

24. BADÍA X, SALAMERO M, ALONSO J. La medida de la salud: Guía de escalas de medición en español. Barcelona: Edimac; 1999.

25. LANDIS J, KOCH G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biostatistics Technical Report. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Michigan. 1976.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

26. CARVAJAL A, CENTENO C, WATSON R, MARTÍNEZ M, SANZ-RUBIALES A. ¿Cómo validar un instrumento de medida de la salud? An Sist Sanit Navar 2011; 34: 63-72.

https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272011000100007

27. SOUTHERN H. Oral care in cancer nursing: nurses knowledge and education. J Adv Nurs 2007; 57: 631-638.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04159.x

28. DANIEL B, DAMATO K, JOHNSON J. Educational issues in oral care. Semin Oncol Nurs 2004; 20: 48-52.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.soncn.2003.10.008

29. WARDH I, PAULSSON G, FRIDLUND B. Nursing staff's understanding of oral health care for patients with cancer diagnoses: an intervention study. J Clin Nurs 2008; 18: 799-806.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02051.x

30. ONWUEGBUZIE A, DANIEL L. A framework for reporting and interpreting internal consistency reliability estimates. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2002; 35: 89-103.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069052

31. CAMPO-ARIAS A, OVIEDO HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: La consistencia interna. Rev Salud Pública 2008; 10: 831-839.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642008000500015

32. PAULSSON G. Comparison of oral health assessments between nursing staff and patients on medical wards. Eur J Cancer Care 2008; 17: 49-55.

Published

2015-08-30

How to Cite

1.
Oroviogoicoechea C, Carvajal A, Soteras M, Beortegui E, De la Hera M, Aznarez M. Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the oral assessment guide (OAG) in cancer patients. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2015 Aug. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 1];38(2):225-34. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/30290

Issue

Section

Research articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.