Parity implications for anthropometrical variables, lifestyle behaviors and dietary habits in pregnant women

Autores/as

  • L. Goñi Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra
  • M. Cuervo Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra
  • S. Santiago Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra
  • I. Zazpe Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra
  • J.A. Martínez Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, University of Navarra CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0321

Palabras clave:

Pregnancy. Parity. Nutritional status. Lifestyle behaviours. Food habits.

Resumen

Background. Maintaining an adequate health status and appropriate lifestyles during pregnancy is of great importance to prevent adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. The present study aimed to assess the nutritional status, socio-demographic features, lifestyle behaviors and dietary habits of pregnant women in Spain, and to identify the influence of parity on these profiles.

Methods. This cross-sectional study included pregnant women from regions all over Spain. The information was collected through a 40 item questionnaire, previously validated by community health professionals.

Results. The 5,087 pregnant women analyzed had an average age of 31.9 years with an adequate nutritional status. The distribution of the sample was 56% nulliparous and 44% multiparous. The nulliparous reported a better self-perceived health status and nutritional balance, and a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. However, the multiparous showed healthier lifestyle habits (lower rates of smoking and alcohol consumption) and more physically active patterns. Regarding diet, nulliparous pregnant women consumed more dairy products, fresh fruit and nuts, and less bread, rice/pasta/potatoes, meat, sausage and buns/pastries than multiparous pregnant women.

Conclusions. Differences between analyzed patterns were observed in anthropometrical variables, lifestyle behaviors and dietary habits, which may require different nutritional messages to nulliparous as compared to multiparous from a public health point of view.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

1. CUERVO M, BALADIA E, GOÑI L, CORBALÁN M, MANERA M, BASULTO J et al. Propuesta de ingestas dietéticas de referencia (IDR) para la población española. In: Federación Española de Sociedades de Nutrición, Alimentación y Dietética (FESNAD), editor. Ingestas Dietéticas de Referencia (IDR) para la población española. España: EUNSA; 2010:263-341.

2. HOVDENAK N, HARAM K. Influence of mineral and vitamin supplements on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 164:127-32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.020

3. MELZER K, SCHUTZ Y. Pre-pregnancy and pregnancy predictors of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010; (Suppl. 2): 44-52.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.239

4. HUARTE CIGANDA M, MODROÑO A, LARRAÑAGA C. Management of hypertension in pregnancy. An Sist Sanit Navar 2009;32 (Suppl 1): 91-103.

5. WENDELL AD. Overview and epidemiology of substance abuse in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 91-96.

https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31827feeb9

6. MELZER K, SCHUTZ Y, BOULVAIN M, KAYSER B. Physical activity and pregnancy: Cardiovascular adaptations, recommendations and pregnancy outcomes. Sports Med 2010;40:493-507.

https://doi.org/10.2165/11532290-000000000-00000

7. GETAHUN D, FASSETT MJ, JACOBSEN SJ. Gestational diabetes: Risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:467.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.032

8. LIU J, BLAIR SN, TENG Y, NESS AR, LAWLOR DA, RIDDOCH C. Physical activity during pregnancy in a prospective cohort of British women: Results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:237-247.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9538-1

9. IV plan de educación nutricional en el periodo pre-concepcional, embarazo y lactancia [Internet]. Available from: http://www.portalfarma.com/Profesionales/campanaspf/categorias/Paginas/Alimentacion/planeducacionplenufar4.aspx. (Accessed 30/03/2014).

10. WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. World medical association declaration of helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191-2194.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

11. GONI L, MARTÍNEZ JA, SANTIAGO S, CUERVO M. Validation of a questionnaire to assess the nutritional status and lifestyles in stages of preconception, pregnancy and lactation. Rev Esp Nutr Comunitaria 2013; 19:105-113.

12. DAPCICH V, SALVADOR G, RIBAS L, PÉREZ C, ARANCETA J, SERRA L. Guía de la alimentación saludable. Madrid; 2004.

13. RICART W, GONZALEZ-HUIX F, CONDE V. Evaluation of the nutritional status through determination of anthropometric parameters: New charts for the working population of Catalonia. group for the evaluation of body composition in the population of Catalonia. Med Clin (Barc) 1993; 100:681-691.

14. RUBIO MA, SALAS-SALVADÓ J, BARBANY M, MORENO B, ARANCETA J, BELLIDO D et al. Consenso SEEDO 2007 para la evaluación del sobrepeso y la obesidad y el establecimiento de criterios de intervención terapéutica. Rev Esp Obes 2007: 1: 7-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7753(07)72531-9

15. LINNE Y, ROSSNER S. Interrelationships between weight development and weight retention in subsequent pregnancies: The SPAWN study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:318-325.

https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00150.x

16. TANG AM, DONG K, DEITCHLER M, CHUNG M, MAALOUF-MANASSEH Z, TUMILOWICZ A et al. Use of cutoffs for mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) as an indicator or predictor of nutritional and health-related outcomes in adolescents and adults: A systematic review. Washington, DC, 2013.

17. LARRANAGA I, SANTA-MARINA L, BEGIRISTAIN H, MACHON M, VRIJHEID M, CASAS M et al. Socio-economic inequalities in health, habits and self-care during pregnancy in Spain. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17: 1315-1324.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1134-4

18. EHRLICH SF, HEDDERSON MM, FENG J, DAVENPORT ER, GUNDERSON EP, FERRARA A. Change in body mass index between pregnancies and the risk of gestational diabetes in a second pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1323-1330.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821aa358

19. PALMA S, PEREZ-IGLESIAS R, PARDO-CRESPO R, LLORCA J, MARISCAL M, DELGADO-RODRIGUEZ M. Smoking among pregnant women in Cantabria (Spain): Trend and determinants of smoking cessation. BMC Public Health 2007;7:65.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-65

20. VILLALBI JR, SALVADOR J, CANO-SERRAL G, RODRIGUEZ-SANZ MC, BORRELL C. Maternal smoking, social class and outcomes of pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:441-447.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00845.x

21. ERICKSON AC, ARBOUR LT. Heavy smoking during pregnancy as a marker for other risk factors of adverse birth outcomes: A population-based study in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Public Health 2012;12:102.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-102

22. BORODULIN K, EVENSON KR, MONDA K, WEN F, HERRING AH, DOLE N. Physical activity and sleep among pregnant women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010;24:45-52.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01081.x

23. NORTHSTONE K, EMMETT P, ROGERS I. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and associations with socio-demographic and lifestyle factors. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:471-479.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602741

24. FERRER C, GARCÍA-ESTEBAN R, MÉNDEZ M, ROMIEU I, TORRENT M, SUNYER J. Social determinants of dietary patterns during pregnancy. Gac Sanit 2009;23:38-43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.05.004

25. BODNAR LM, SIEGA-RIZ AM. A diet quality index for pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5:801-809.

https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2002348

26. UUSITALO L, UUSITALO U, OVASKAINEN ML, NIINISTO S, KRONBERG-KIPPILA C, MARJAMAKI L et al. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics are associated with antioxidant intake and the consumption of their dietary sources during pregnancy. Public Health Nutr 2008;11:1379-1388.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008003522

27. WILKINSON SA, MCINTYRE HD. Evaluation of the 'healthy start to pregnancy' early antenatal health promotion workshop: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12: 31.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-131

28. ORTIZ-ANDRELLUCCHI A, SANCHEZ-VILLEGAS A, RAMIREZ-GARCÍA O, SERRA-MAJEM L. Assessment of nutritional quality in healthy pregnant women of the Canary Islands, Spain. Med Clin (Barc) 2009;133:615-621.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2009.06.012

29. BENCAIOVA G, BURKHARDT T, BREYMANN C. Anemia-prevalence and risk factors in pregnancy. Eur J Intern Med 2012;23:529-533.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2012.04.008

30. CUERVO M, GARCÍA A, ANSORENA D, SÁNCHEZ-VILLEGAS A, MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLEZ M,ASTIASARÁN I, MARTÍNEZ JA.Nutritional assessment interpretation on 22,007 Spanish community-dwelling elders through the Mini Nutritional Assessment tes. Public Health Nutr 2009; 12: 82-90.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898000800195X

Publicado

24-11-2014

Cómo citar

1.
Goñi L, Cuervo M, Santiago S, Zazpe I, Martínez J. Parity implications for anthropometrical variables, lifestyle behaviors and dietary habits in pregnant women. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 24 de noviembre de 2014 [citado 6 de diciembre de 2025];37(3):349-62. Disponible en: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/28544

Número

Sección

Artículos originales

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

1 2 > >> 

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.