Evolution and development of the Spanish badminton 2000-2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.90491Keywords:
sports, sports organization, strategic planning, performance measurementAbstract
The management of contemporary sports is based on organizational performance and its consequence in sports performance. An ex post facto case study was designed, a retrospective analysis (2000-2019) of an organizational unit (Spanish Badminton Federation, FESBA) of apreferably qualitative nature, which interacts with statistical predictions and analysis of temporal evolutions. The study includes five dimensions (Economic, Sports, Social, Organizational and Dissemination) and twenty-five variables. The social and economic dimensions, the organization of national competitions, the quality of the results and the dissemination are shown as key indicators (leverage dimensions). The economic dimension correlates with sportsman's licenses, number of clubs and organized national competitions (Rho = .964, .967 and .904 respectively). The organizational dimension had a direct consequence in anncrease in national competitions, achieving a greater interest in broadcast channels (Rho = .838). Stable growth has been observed in the social dimension. It is from 2014 when this evolution is accentuated, coinciding with an audiovisual strategy by FESBA and a projection of the figure of Carolina Marín. The resources of the FESBA have made it possible to obtain a greater number of practitioners generating more school licenses, in a system of national competitions, with an increase in the variable quality of results, simultaneously with a greater number of official licenses and clubs. This statement interacts with the broadcast effect on TV and the media. The synchrony between the evolution of the data analyzed and the performance materialized in the different programs developed by FESBA is demonstrated.
References
AIMC (2014). Informe de Marcas. Madrid: Asociación para la Investigación de Medios de Comunicación. www.aimc.es.
AIMC (2015). Informe de Marcas. Madrid: Asociación para la Investigación de Medios de Comunicación. www.aimc.es.
AIMC (2019). Informe de Marcas. Madrid: Asociación para la Investigación de Medios de Comunicación. www.aimc.es.
ADESP (2018). Estudio comparativo internacional de los modelos de deporte de alto nivel. Madrid: Deloitte Consulting SLU.
ADESP (2019) Propuesta de Modificación del Anteproyecto de Ley del Deporte. Madrid. Asociación del Deporte Español.
Barth, M., Emrich, E., & Daumann, F. (2018). Approaches and methods used for measuring organizational performance in national sport governing bodies from 1986 to 2014. A systematized review. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 3.
Bayle, E. & Madella, A. (2002). Development of a taxonomy of performance for national sport organizations. European Journal of Sport Science (2),4.
Cabello, D. (2004) Federación Española de Bádminton. Plan Estratégico 2005-2012. Madrid.
Cabello, D., Rivera, E., Trigueros, C. & Pérez, I. (2011). Análisis del modelo del deporte federado español del siglo XXI. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (11),44,690-707.
Cabello, D. (2018) Conferencia de la Academia Olímpica Española. Granada: Academia Olímpica Española.
Cardenal, M. (2015). Comparecencia del Presidente del Consejo Superior de Deportes, ante la Comisión de Educación y Deportes del Congreso de los Diputados (9/03/2015). Cortes generales, Diario de sesiones. Senado. X legislatura Madrid, nº427, p10
COE (2012). Conclusiones del Foro del Deporte Federado. Madrid: Comité Olímpico Español.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ª Ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cruickshank, A., & Collins, D. (2012). Culture change in elite sport performance teams: Examining and advancing effectiveness in the new era. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (24), 338-355
CSD (2008 a). Análisis del modelo de excelencia del deporte federado español. En Memoria del proyecto de investigación Nº Exp. 04.UPB31.08. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Deportes.
CSD (2008 b). Memoria del proyecto de investigación Nº Exp.17/UPB20/08. Análisis y estudio comparado del modelo financiación y evaluación de la excelencia del deporte federado español en el entorno de la UE. Propuesta de mejora e incentivos fiscales para el alto rendimiento. Madrid: CSD.
CSD (2010). Análisis del modelo de financiación del deporte en Reino Unido y Francia. Una propuesta para el incremento de la participación de la iniciativa privada en la financiación del alto rendimiento deportivo en España. En Memoria del proyecto de investigación nº Exp. 09/UPB20/10. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Deportes.
Vilanova A, Inglés E, Martín A, Bou L y González S (2011). Memoria Científico-Técnica. Factores de la política deportiva española que conducen al éxito deportivo internacional. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Deportes.
De Bosscher, V. (2007). Sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Bruselas: Vrije Universiteit Brussels.
FESBA (2014). Actualización Plan Estratégico. Madrid: Federación Española de Bádminton. www.badminton.es.
FESBA (2019) Bádminton con Sentido Social. En Cantó, C (coordinación). VII Jornadas #MKTDEPORTE: Márketing deportivo con sentido social. Madrid.
Ley 10/1990, de 15 de octubre, del Deporte (1990). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 249, 17 de octubre de 1990, 30397-30411.
Montserrat, J., González, P. & Campillo, C. (2020). La comunicación organizacional en las Entidades Deportivas Naúticas. Propuesta de modelo estratégico y relacional. Retos, 38, 692-699.
Sáinz de Baranda, C., Barbero, M.A. & Fernández, J.G. (2019) La influencia del éxito de Carolina Marín en la repercusión mediática del bádminton. Tándem, 65, 41-52.
O’Boyle, I. & Hassan, D. (2014). Performance management and measurement in national-level non-profit sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly (ESMQ) (14),3, 299-314.
Papadimitriou, D. & Taylor, P. (2000). Organisational effectiveness of Hellenic national sports organisations: A multiple constituency approach, Sport Management Review (3),1,23-46.
Papadimitriou, D. (2002) Amateur structures and their effect on performance: the case of Greek voluntary sports clubs. Managing Leisure(7),205-219.
Puga, E. (2018). El efecto de la crisis en el deporte federado español y su realidad a nivel europeo. Universidad de Jaén. http://dspace.ujaen.es/handle/10953/997.
Sáinz de Baranda, C., Barbero, M.A. & Fernández, J.G. (2019) La influencia del éxito de Carolina Marín en la repercusión mediática del bádminton. Tándem, 65, 41-52
Shilbury, D. & Moore, K.A. (2006). A study of organizational effectiveness for national Olympic sporting organizations, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (35),1,5-38.
Sotiriadou P & De Bosscher V (2018) Managing high-performance sport: introduction to past, present and future considerations. ESMQ (18),1: Managing High Performance Sport
Torrebadella-Flix, X. & Domínguez, J.A. (2018). El deporte en la educación física escolar. La revisión histórica de una crítica inacabada. Retos, 34, 403-411.
Winand, M., Zintz, T., Bayle, E. & Robinson, L. (2010) Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies: dealing with measurement and priorities. Managing Leisure (15), 4.
Winand, M., Vos, S., Claessen, S., Thibaut, E. & Scheerder, J. (2014). A unified model of non-profit sport organizations performance: perspectives from the literature. Managing Leisure (19),2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jaime Gómez Rodríguez, Pedro Tomás Gómez Piriz, David Cabello Manrique
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.
