Análisis crítico de la propuesta del currículum básico de la LOMCE para la asignatura de Educación Física. Acciones derivadas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón y propuestas de futuro (Critical analysis of the basic LOMCE Physical Education curriculum. Co
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i29.40968Keywords:
Currículum, Didáctica, Programación, Evaluación, Bloques de contenido, Dominios de acción motriz (Curriculum, Didactics, Teaching syllabus, Assessment, Content Blocs, Action domain of motor skills)Abstract
El objeto de este artículo consiste en analizar los aspectos positivos y negativos que tiene el área de Educación Física dentro de la normativa vigente de la LOMCE para Educación Primaria. Se han revisado las competencias que tienen el Estado y las Administraciones educativas, presentando la nueva situación del área en la normativa educativa y las posibles razones para ubicarla entre las asignaturas específicas. La propuesta curricular presenta interesantes aportaciones en la introducción del documento, como por ejemplo, la propuesta de organizar el área a partir de los dominios de acción motriz. Por otro lado, evidenciamos la incoherencia que existe entre la introducción y el listado propuesto de criterios de evaluación y estándares de aprendizaje y determinamos unos criterios claros para establecer un debate y un análisis de las propuestas curriculares realizadas. Presentamos las diez principales decisiones tomadas en Aragón para la confección del currículo, buscando una alta coherencia interna. Por último, establecemos unas premisas para futuras propuestas curriculares a nivel nacional.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyse positive and negative aspects of Physical Education at Primary education according to LOMCE legislation. State and Education Administrations competences will be reviewed. We will introduce the new regulatory framework and the hypothetic reasons to include physical education area into the specific subjects. The curricular proposal shows interesting suggestions in the introduction section, such as the proposal of organizing the area from the action domain of motor skills. The study tries to evidence the incoherence between the introduction and the series of evaluation criteria and learning standards. Along with it, clear criteria will be determined in order to stimulate discussion and the analysis of curricular proposals forwarded. Ten main decisions adopted in the Aragon regulatory framework will be discussed searching for higher internal coherence. Finally, some assumptions for future national proposals will be displayed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.