How do university students appraise telesimulation? Cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.110364Keywords:
learning, simulation, telesimulation, university studentsAbstract
COVID-19 pandemic encouraged universities to implement strategies such as telesimulation. However, students' perspectives on this strategy have been largely overlooked. This study aimed to analyse student satisfaction with telesimulation. A descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted whit 155 physiotherapy students in their second, third and fourth years. Student satisfaction was measured using an adapted version of the survey of Quality and Satisfaction Survey of Clinical Simulation (ECSSC) at the end of the courses taught through telesimulation. Differences by year were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The median and interquartile range of the ECSSC score was 48 (43-52) for the general group and 51 (46-53), 47 (43-49) and 48.5 (37-52) for the second-, third- and fourth-year students respectively. Notably, second-year students reported higher satisfaction scores compared to third-year counterparts. Overall, the results indicate a positive evaluation of the telesimulation strategy, particularly among second-year students.
References
Alconero-Camarero, A., Cobo, C., González-Gómez, S., Ibáñez-Rementería, I. y Alvarez-García, M. (2020). Descriptive study of the satisfaction of nursing degree students in high-fidelity clinical simulation practices. Enfermería Clínica (English Edition), 30(6), 404-410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2019.07.007
Alconero Camarero, A. R., Martínez Arce, A., Maestre Alonso, J. M., García, S., Cobo Sánchez, J. L., y del Moral, I. (2013). La simulación clínica como instrumento de aprendizaje en cuidados cardiológicos: experiencia en el pregrado. El Congreso De Las Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, 66(1).
Andrea, C. M., Kupczynski, L., & McCraney, M. (2022). Promoting interprofessional collaboration among pediatric physi-cal therapy students through remote simulation. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i5.5211
Astudillo, Á., López, M., Cádiz, V., Fierro, J., Figueroa, A. y Vilches, N. (2017). Validación de la encuesta de calidad y satisfacción de simulación clínica en estudiantes de enfermería. Ciencia y enfermería, 23(2), 133-145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532017000200133
Costa, M. & Carvalho-Filho, M. (2020). A new age for medical education after COVID-19. FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica, 23(2), 55-57.
Recuperado de https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S2014-98322020000200001&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Díaz Agea, J., Pujalte-Jesús, M. y Leal Costa, C. (2020). Simular en tiempos de confinamiento. Cómo transformar la simula-ción clínica a un formato online en un contexto universitario de Ciencias de la Salud. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Nava-rra, 43(2), 273-276.
https://dx.doi.org/10.23938/assn.0865
Henao, O., Escallón, J., Green, J., Farcas, M., Sierra, J. M., Sánchez, W., y Okrainec, A. (2013). Fundamentos de cirugía laparoscópica en Colombia con telesimulación: una herramienta adicional para la formación integral de ciruja-nos. Biomédica, 33(1), 107-114.
https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v33i1.1425
Heo, M., Kim, N., & Faith, M. S. (2015). Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC medical research methodology, 15, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0070-6
Lacoste-Abarzúa, C., Burgos-Fica, A. y Bascour-Sandoval, C. (2018). Estrategias de aprendizaje utilizadas por es-tudiantes universitarios de Carreras de la Salud de la ciudad de Temuco: su influencia en los resultados académicos. Revista Edu-cación Ciencias Salud, 15(2), 76-81.
McCoy, C., Sayegh, J., Alrabah, R., & Yarris L. (2017) Telesimulation: An Innovative Tool for Health Professions Educa-tion. AEM Education and Training, 1(2), 132-136.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10015
Mercado-Cruz, E., Morales-Acevedo, J., Lugo-Reyes, G., Quintos-Romero, A., & Esperón-Hernández, R. (2021). Tel-esimulation: a strategy to develop clinical skills in medical students. Investigación en educación médica, 10(40), 19-28.
Muñoz-Poblete, C., Bascour-Sandoval, C., Soto-Rodríguez, F., Coronado, J. C., Gittermann, R., y Hunter, K. (2023). Per-cepción del logro de competencias genéricas y empleabilidad entre un modelo de aprendizaje basado en problemas y un modelo tradicional en la formación de Kinesiólogos. Revista de Educación en Ciencias de la Salud, 20(1), 18-23.
Naik, N., Finkelstein, RA, Howell, J., Rajwani, K. y Ching, K. (2020). Telesimulación para la capacitación en manejo de ventiladores COVID-19 con restricciones de distanciamiento social durante la pandemia de coronavirus. Simulación y jue-gos, 51 (4), 571-577.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120926561
Núñez-Cortés, J. (2020). COVID-19 por SARS-Cov2 también ha afectado a la Educación Médica. Educación Médica, 21(4), 261-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.06.001
Okrainec, A., Henao, O. & Azzie, G. (2010). Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparo-scopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc, 24, 417-422.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0572-6
Placencia Medina, M., García Bustamante, C., Mendoza Rojas, H., Tenorio Salas, L., Silva Valencia, J., y Carreño Escobedo, J. (2015). Nivel de satisfacción de estudiantes en el diseño e implementación del laboratorio de simulación virtual en la Sección de Farmacología de la Facultad de Medicina de la UNMSM. Horizonte Médico (Lima), 15(3), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2015.v15n3
Ruiz, A., Ferrer, E., Guirao-Goris, S., Montejano, R., Mármol, M., y Gea, V. (2019). Evaluación de la vídeo-simulación como metodología docente para la entrevista motivacional en estudiantes de enfermería. Cultura de los cuidados, 53, 239-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2019.53.23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Retos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.