Asociaciones de la evaluación de la competencia motriz orientada al proceso e híbrida en adolescentes españoles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v63.110003Palabras clave:
Adolescentes, competencia motriz, desarrollo motor, evaluación motriz, habilidades motrices básicasResumen
Introducción: a pesar de las discrepancias entre las evaluaciones motrices orientadas al proceso y al producto, existen en la literatura propuestas híbridas con enfoques más completos.
Objetivo: el estudio exploró las asociaciones entre evaluaciones motrices orientadas al proceso e híbridas en adolescentes españoles para comprobar posibles constructos de competencia motriz (MC) superpuestos.
Metodología: 82 estudiantes españoles de educación secundaria pública se sometieron a evaluaciones utilizando el Test of Gross Motor Development – 3rd edition (TGMD-3) y el Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA).
Resultados: para los chicos, todas las variables mostraron asociaciones significativas, con correlaciones entre moderadas (r = 0.30-0.49) y altas (r ≥ 0.50). Para las chicas, se encontraron asociaciones significativas entre la puntuación de habilidades manipulativas del TGMD-3 (TGMD-3-MS) y la puntuación de habilidades del CAMSA (CAMSA-SS), TGMD-3-MS y puntuación total CAMSA (CAMSA-T), puntuación de habilidades loco-motoras TGMD-3 (TGMD-3-LS) y CAMSA-T, puntuación total TGMD-3 y CAMSA-SS, y puntuación total TGMD-3 y CAMSA-T. Todas estas asociaciones fueron moderadas (r = 0.30-0.49). Los chicos mostraron medias estadísticamente superiores en estatura (tamaño del efecto [ES] = 0.65), TGMD-3-MS (ES = 1.74), TGMD-3-T (ES = 1.07), CAMSA-TS (ES = 1.09) y CAMSA-T (ES = 0.97).
Discusión: las asociaciones significativas encontradas entre los test se alinean con los patrones observados entre otros test híbridos y orientados al proceso en la literatura.
Conclusiones: estos resultados sugieren que ambas pruebas pueden medir constructos de MC similares. Sin embargo, debe tenerse precaución en las adolescentes españolas, donde se observaron menos correlaciones y más débiles.
Citas
Bolger, L. E., Bolger, L. A., O’Neill, C., Coughlan, E., O’Brien, W., Lacey, S., Burns, C., & Bardid, F. (2021). Global levels of fundamental motor skills in children: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(7), 717-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1841405
Burton, A. M., Cowburn, I., Thompson, F., Eisenmann, J. C., Nicholson, B., & Till, K. (2023). Associations Between Motor Competence and Physical Activity, Physical Fitness and Psychosocial Characteristics in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(11), 2191-2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01886-1
Cao, Y., Zhang, C. H., Guo, R., Zhang, D. D., & Wang, S. J. (2020). Performances of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), and validity of timing components in comparison with three commonly used agility tests in Chinese boys: an exploratory study. Peerj, 8, Article e8784. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8784
Carballo-Fazanes, A., Rey, E., Valentini, N. C., Rodríguez-Fernández, J. E., Varela-Casal, C., Rico-Díaz, J., Barcala-Furelos, R., & Abelairas-Gómez, C. (2021). Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041652
Carballo-Fazanes, A., Rey, E., Valentini, N. C., Varela-Casal, C., & Abelairas-Gómez, C. (2023). Interrater Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition Following Raters’ Agreement on Measurement Criteria. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 11(2), 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2022-0068
Carballo-Fazanes, A., Rodríguez-Fernández, J. E., Mohedano-Vázquez, N., Rodríguez-Núñez, A., & Abelairas-Gómez, C. (2022). Competencia motriz y condición física relacionada con la salud en escolares de Educación Primaria (Motor competence and health-related physical fitness in schoolchildren). Retos, 46, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.93906
Chang, J. D., Yong, L. M., Yan, H., Wang, J. B., & Song, N. Q. (2021). Measurement Properties of Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment for Children Aged 9-12 Years Using Rasch Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 745449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.745449
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
dos Santos, F. G., Pacheco, M. M., Stodden, D., Tani, G., & Maia, J. A. R. (2022). Testing Seefeldt's Proficiency Barrier: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), Article 7184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127184
Haapala E. A. (2013). Cardiorespiratory fitness and motor skills in relation to cognition and academic performance in children - a review. Journal of human kinetics, 36, 55–68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3661895/#:~:text=The%20findings%20presented%20in%20this,differentially%20related%20to%20cognitive%20functions.
Hardy, L. L., Barnett, L., Espinel, P., & Okely, A. D. (2013). Thirteen-Year Trends in Child and Adolescent Fundamental Movement Skills: 1997-2010. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(10), 1965-1970. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318295a9fc
Hardy, L. L., Reinten-Reynolds, T., Espinel, P., Zask, A., & Okely, A. D. (2012). Prevalence and Correlates of Low Fundamental Movement Skill Competency in Children. Pediatrics, 130(2), e390-e398. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0345
Hulteen, R. M., Terlizzi, B., Abrams, T. C., Sacko, R. S., De Meester, A., Pesce, C., & Stodden, D. F. (2023). Reinvest to Assess: Advancing Approaches to Motor Competence Measurement Across the Lifespan. Sports Medicine, 53(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01750-8
Hulteen, R. M., True, L., & Pfeiffer, K. A. (2020). Differences in associations of product- and process-oriented motor competence assessments with physical activity in children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(4), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1702279
Jimenez-Garcia, J. A., Montpetit, C., & DeMont, R. (2024). Concurrent and Convergent Validity of the Child Focused Injury Risk Screening Tool (ChildFirst) for 8-12-Year-Old Children. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 28(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2023.2211980
Jones, D., Innerd, A., Giles, E. L., & Azevedo, L. B. (2020). Association between fundamental motor skills and physical activity in the early years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(6), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.03.001
Khodaverdi, Z., Bahram, A., Khalaji, H., Kazemnejad, A., Ghadiri, F., & Lopes, V. P. (2020). Performance assessments on three different motor competence testing batteries in girls aged 7-10. Sport Sciences for Health, 16(4), 747-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-020-00653-3
Lander, N., Morgan, P. J., Salmon, J., Logan, S. W., & Barnett, L. M. (2017). The reliability and validity of an authentic motor skill assessment tool for early adolescent girls in an Australian school setting. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(6), 590-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.007
Li, K., Bao, R., Kim, H., Ma, J., Song, C., Chen, S., & Cai, Y. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder in Chinese children. PeerJ, 11, e15447. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15447
Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Faigenbaum, A. D., Myer, G. D., & De Ste Croix, M. B. A. (2014). Chronological Age vs. Biological Maturation: Implications for Exercise Programming in Youth. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(5), 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000391
Logan, S. W., Barnett, L. M., Goodway, J. D., & Stodden, D. F. (2017a). Comparison of performance on process- and product-oriented assessments of fundamental motor skills across childhood. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(7), 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1183803
Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., & Lucas, W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health and Development, 38(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x
Logan, S. W., Ross, S. M., Chee, K., Stodden, D. F., & Robinson, L. E. (2017b). Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 39, S79-S79.
Longmuir, P. E., Boyer, C., Lloyd, M., Borghese, M. M., Knight, E., Saunders, T. J., Boiarskaia, E., Zhu, W., & Tremblay, M. S. (2017). Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8-12 years of age. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6(2), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.11.004
Lubans, D. R., Morgan, P. J., Cliff, D. P., Barnett, L. M., & Okely, A. D. (2010). Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents Review of Associated Health Benefits. Sports Medicine, 40(12), 1019-1035. https://doi.org/10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000
Menescardi, C., Villarrasa-Sapina, I., Lander, N., & Estevan, I. (2022). Canadian Agility Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA) in a Spanish Contex Evidences of Reliability and Validity. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 26(3), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2021.2020794
Newell, K. M. (2020). What are Fundamental Motor Skills and What is Fundamental About Them? Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(2), 280-314. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2020-0013
O’Brien, W., Philpott, C., Lester, D., Belton, S., Duncan, M. J., Donovan, B., Chambers, F., & Utesch, T. (2023). Motor competence assessment in physical education - convergent validity between fundamental movement skills and functional movement assessments in adolescence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(3), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1990241
Palmer, K. K., Stodden, D. F., Ulrich, D. A., & Robinson, L. E. (2021). Using Process- and Product-oriented Measures to Evaluate Changes in Motor Skills across an Intervention. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 25(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2021.1876069
Philpott, C., Donovan, B., Belton, S., Lester, D., Chambers, F., & O'Brien, W. (2023). Motor Competence Among Irish Adolescents: An Investigation of Sex Differences and Relatedness Between Fundamental Movement Skills and Functional Movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 130(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221137182
Re, A. H. N., Logan, S. W., Cattuzzo, M. T., Henrique, R. S., Tudela, M. C., & Stodden, D. F. (2018). Comparison of motor competence levels on two assessments across childhood. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1276294
Rey, E., Carballo-Fazanes, A., Varela-Casal, C., Abelairas-Gomez, C., & Collaborators, A.-M. P. (2020). Reliability of the test of gross motor development: A systematic review. Plos One, 15(7), Article e0236070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236070
Ritonga, I., Gusril, G., Kiram, Y., Lanos, M. E. C., & Festiawan, R. (2024). Designing an innovative learning model for fundamental throwing and catching skills using the teaching games for understanding (tgfu) approach in elementary education. Retos, 61, 448–454. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.108823
Robinson, L. E., Stodden, D. F., Barnett, L. M., Lopes, V. P., Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P., & D'Hondt, E. (2015). Motor Competence and its Effect on Positive Developmental Trajectories of Health. Sports Medicine, 45(9), 1273-1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6
Stearns, J. A., Wohlers, B., McHugh, T. L. F., Kuzik, N., & Spence, J. C. (2019). Reliability and Validity of the PLAYfun Tool with Children and Youth in Northern Canada. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 23(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2018.1500368
Tompsett, C., Sanders, R., Taylor, C., & Cobley, S. (2017). Pedagogical Approaches to and Effects of Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 47(9), 1795-1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0697-z
Ulrich, D.A. (2019). Test of gross motor development (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed Publishers.
Valentini, N. C., Duarte, M. G., Zanella, L. W., & Nobre, G. C. (2022). Test of Gross Motor Development-3: Item Difficulty and Item Differential Functioning by Gender and Age with Rasch Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), Article 8667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148667
van Sluijs, E. M. F., Ekelund, U., Crochemore-Silva, I., Guthold, R., Ha, A., Lubans, D., Oyeyemi, A. L., Ding, D., Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2021). Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. Lancet, 398(10298), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01259-9
Weaver, R. G., Tassitano, R. M., Tenorio, M. C. M., Brazendale, K., & Beets, M. W. (2021). Temporal Trends in Children's School Day Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis [Review]. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 18(11), 1446-1467. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2021-0254
Webster, E. K., & Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third edition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0003
Webster, E. K., Martin, C. K., & Staiano, A. E. (2019). Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(2), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006
Wu, H., Eungpinichpong, W., Ruan, H., Zhang, X. D., & Dong, X. J. (2021). Relationship between motor fitness, fundamental movement skills, and quality of movement patterns in primary school children. Plos One, 16(5), Article e0237760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237760
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Samuel Carrera, Adriana Aparicio-Ferrero, Ezequiel Rey, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
Esta revista sigue la "open access policy" de BOAI (1), apoyando los derechos de los usuarios a "leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de los artículos".
(1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
