Las percepciones sobre el estado de los servicios de salud y el voto del Brexit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.36Palabras clave:
Brexit, percepciones, servicios de salud, fake newsResumen
Las razones del Brexit han sido extensamente analizadas. Distintos estudios se han centrado en factores como la edad, educación, etnia, ingresos, clase social, desempleo, religión, inmigración, y el apoyo a partidos y líderes. Ningún trabajo ha estudiado sin embargo el impacto de las percepciones sobre la calidad de los servicios de salud. Esta ausencia es sorprendente porque los partidarios del Brexit prometieron (engañosamente) que, de triunfar éste, el Servicio Nacional de Salud (SNS) recibiría semanalmente 350 millones de libras. Como los individuos que perciben que dichos servicios son malos se beneficiarán de un SNS mejor financiado, anticipamos que exhibirán una mayor propensión a votar a favor del Brexit. Nuestros resultados lo confirman, incluso cuando se introduce una amplia batería de controles. Este hallazgo constituye una contribución original a un tema crucial de la política internacional y enfatiza la importancia de las percepciones y las fake news en el comportamiento electoral.
Citas
Abrams, D., & Travaglino, G. A. (2018). Immigration, political trust, and Brexit—Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12233
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In F. Csáki & B. N. Petrov (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory: Tsahkadsor, Armenia, U. S. S. R., September 2-8, 1971. Akademiai Kiado.
Alabrese, E., Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2019). Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.002
Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J. (2013). Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1664–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013489081
Ashcroft, M. (2016, June 24). How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday... And why. Lord Ashcroft Polls. https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/
Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy, 32(92), 601–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix012
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97636
Cantarella, M., Fraccaroli, N., & Volpe, R. (2019). Does Fake News Affect Voting Behaviour? (No. 146; DEMB Working Paper Series). Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia. Dipartimento di Economia Marco Biaggi. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402913
Christmann, A., & Danaci, D. (2012). Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Direct and Indirect Effects on Religious Minorities in Switzerland. Politics and Religion, 5(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048311000666
Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(3), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx005
Crescenzi, R., Cataldo, M. D., & Faggian, A. (2018). Internationalized at work and localistic at home: The ‘split’ Europeanization behind Brexit. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12350
Curtice, J. (2017). Has Brexit Reshaped British Politics? (pp. 1–24). NatCen Social Research. https://whatukthinks.org/eu/analysis/has-brexit-reshaped-british-politics/
Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Social Networks, 50, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.002
Donovan, T., & Bowler, S. (1998). Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991742
Dorling, D. (2016). Brexit: The decision of a divided country. BMJ, 354(1–2), i3697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3697
ESS. (2018a). European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). Data file edition 2.1. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.
ESS. (2018b). European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). ESS8- 2016 Documentation Report. Edition 2.1 (pp. 1–190). European Social Survey Data Archive, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC.
ESS. (2018c). European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). UK Country—Specific Data. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.
Fidrmuc, J., Hulényi, M., & Tunali, C. (2016). Money Can’t Buy EU Love: European Funds and the Brexit Referendum (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6107). CESifo. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cesceswps/_5f6107.htm
Frey, B. S., & Goette, L. (1998). Does the Popular Vote Destroy Civil Rights? American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991861
Gamble, B. S. (1997). Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111715
Goodwin, M. J., & Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12285
Halikiopoulou, D., & Vlandas, T. (2017). Voting to leave: Economic insecurity and the Brexit vote. In B. Leruth, N. Startin, & S. Usherwood (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism (pp. 139–154). Routledge.
Heinze, G., & Dunkler, D. (2017). Five myths about variable selection. Transplant International, 30(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12895
Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
Ipsos MORI. (2016). Political Monitor Topline Results, 16 June 2016. IPSOS MORI. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/migrations/en-uk/files/Assets/Docs/Polls/pm-16-june-2016-topline.pdf
Janmaat, J. G., Melis, G., Green, A., & Pensiero, N. (2018). Changing preferences for Brexit: Identifying the groups with volatile support for ‘Leave’ (No. 65; LLAKES Research Paper). Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Institute for Social and Economic Research. https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/525212
Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
Jermias, J. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and resistance to change: The influence of commitment confirmation and feedback on judgment usefulness of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00008-8
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.4.557
LeDuc, L. (2003). The politics of direct democracy: Referendums in global perspective. Broadview Press.
Lewis, D. C. (2011). Direct democracy and minority rights: Same-sex marriage bans in the U.S. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00773.x
Liberini, F., Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Redoano, M. (2019). Was Brexit triggered by the old and unhappy? Or by financial feelings? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.024
Lupia, A., Krupnikov, Y., Levine, A. S., Piston, S., & Von Hagen-Jamar, A. (2010). Why State Constitutions Differ in their Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000642
Mendelsohn, M., & Cutler, F. (2000). The Effect of Referendums on Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicization, Efficacy and Tolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 669–698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400220292
Palma, P. A., Sinclair, V. M., & Esses, V. M. (2019). Facts versus feelings: Objective and subjective experiences of diversity differentially impact attitudes towards the European Union: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219854805
Rolfe, H., Ahlstrom-Vij, K., Hudson-Sharp, N., & Runge, J. (2018, October 8). Post-Brexit Immigration Policy: Reconciling Public Perceptions with Economic Evidence. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. https://www.niesr.ac.uk/publications/post-brexit-immigration-policy-reconciling-public-perceptions-economic-evidence
Santana, A., & Rama, J. (2017). Manual de análisis de datos con Stata (1st ed.). Editorial Tecnos. https://www.tecnos.es/ficha.php?id=5044951&pageid=4
Sartori, G. (1969). From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology*. Government and Opposition, 4(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1969.tb00173.x
Shaw, D., Smith, C. M., & Scully, J. (2017). Why did Brexit happen? Using causal mapping to analyse secondary, longitudinal data. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(3), 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.051
Smith, M. (2005). The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the United States. PS: Political Science & Politics, 38(2), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096505056349
Swales, K. (2016). Understanding the Leave vote (pp. 1–32). NatCen Social Research. https://natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/understanding-the-leave-vote/
Townson, S. (2019). New elements behind the Brexit Referendum: The Impact of health Perceptions on the Brexit Vote.
Uleri, P. V. (1996). Introduction. In M. Gallagher & P. V. Uleri (Eds.), The referendum experience in Europe (pp. 1–19). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Vanderleeuw, J. M., & Engstrom, R. L. (1987). Race, Referendums, and Roll-Off. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 1081–1092. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130785
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Española de Sociología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todas las publicaciones de la Revista Española de Sociología se realizarán bajo una licencia abierta Creative Commons de Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Dicha licencia establece que los autores son los poseedores de los derechos de propiedad intelectual de sus trabajos, que pueden redistribuirse a cambio de un reconocimiento adecuado. Para más información de la licencia Creative Commons, consultar aquí.
Una vez aceptado un artículo para su publicación, la Revista Española de Sociología solicitará al denominado "autor para la correspondencia" la aceptación de una licencia obligatoria Creative Commons incluida en un acuerdo o contrato de publicación.
