Predictive validity of Bishop and Burnett Scores for vaginal delivery modified by parity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0043Keywords:
Spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma. Abdominal wall disease. Anticoagulant therapy. Transcatheter embolization. Abdominal pain.Abstract
Background. Validating the predictive capacity on the outcome of labour of the Bishop Score (BS) and the simplified Burnett Score (BRS) compared to their modified versions, in which parity is incorporated.
Methods. Historical cohorts out of a total of 728 inductions during the years 2012-2013 in the "La Mancha-Centro" Hospital of Alcázar de San Juan. We evaluated the predictive characteristics by areas under the (AUC) ROC curve for each parameter of BS and BRS and for parity, as well as for each of the 4 indices.
Results. Parity and all the parameters of BS and BRS, except for foetal station and cervical position, were associated with the outcome of labour. Two modified scales were defined on the basis of BS and BRS, following removal of the “foetal station” parameter due to its low discriminative capacity: BSM and BRSM. Nulliparity was given a value of 0 points, and multiparity a value of 3 points for BSM, and 2 for BRSM.
Modified indices showed a higher predictive ability (AUC) for vaginal delivery than the original indices, for both BS (0.70 vs. 0.62) and for BRS (0.69 vs. 0.62).
Conclusion. Replacing the “foetal station” parameter with parity in BS and BRS, improves predictive capacity with regard to the original indices in order to determine the outcome of labour.
Downloads
References
Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Inducción de parto. Protocolos prosego. http://www.gapsego.com/categoria-guia-asistencia/medicina-perinatal/page/4/. Consultado el 10 de febrero de 2016.
Health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. European perinatal health report 2014: 90-92.
http://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html.
BISHOP EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266-268.
BURNETT JE Jr. Preinduction scoring: an objective approach to induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1966; 28: 479-483.
CRANE JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 573-584.
TEIXEIRA C, LUNET N, RODRIGUES T, BARROS H. The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 739-753.
KOLKMAN DG, VERHOEVEN CJ, BRINKHORST SJ, VAN DER POST JA, PAJKRT E, OPMEER BC et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30: 625-630.
LAUGHON SK, ZHANG J, TROENDLE J, SUN L, REDDY UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 805-811.
JOURNET D, GAUCHERAND P, DORET M. Score de Bishop modifié par la parité pour le déclenchement du travail à terme: une étude rétrospective. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2012; 41: 339-345.
BERTOSSA P, NOVAKOV MA, STUPAR ZT, MILATOVIC S, BOULVAIN M, IRION O, et al. Validity of clinical and ultrasound variables to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 53-59.
CHEUNG CW, LEUNG TY, SAHOTA DS, CHAN OK, CHAN LW, FUNG TY et al. Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1406-1412.
RANE SM, GUIRGIS RR, HIGGINS B, NICOLAIDES KH. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17: 315-322.
CRANE JM, DELANEY T, BUTT KD, BENNETT KA, HUTCHENS D, YOUNG DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15: 319-323.
HOSMER DW, LEMESHOW S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Willey, 2000.
BUENO B, SAN-FRUTOS L, PEREZ-MEDINA T, BARBANCHO C, TROYANO J, BAJO J. The labor induction: integrated clinical and sonographic variables that predict the outcome. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 4-8.
CNATTINGIUS R, HOGLUND B, KIELER H. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 456-462.
PITARELLO PR, TADASHI YC, RUANO R, ZUGAIB M. Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements. J Clin Ultrasound 2013; 41: 76-83.
DHALL K, MITTAL SC, KUMAR A. Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27: 309-311.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 386-397.
LEDUC D, BIRINGER A, LEE L, DY J, CORBETT T, LEDUC D, et al. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 840-857.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
