Nuevas aplicaciones de la cápsula endoscópica: PILLCAM™ ESO
Palabras clave:
Cápsula endoscópica, Esófago, ERGE, VaricesResumen
La enteroscopia con cápsula abre una nueva era en el estudio de las enfermedades del intestino delgado. En estos momentos sus indicaciones están bien definidas y este procedimiento se ha convertido en una herramienta de primera línea en el estudio del intestino delgado. La esofagoscopia con cápsula se ha mostrado como una alternativa eficaz y segura en pacientes con sospecha de patología esofágica y en aquellos pacientes que no desean ser sometidos a una esofagoscopia convencional. No obstante y a pesar de que los resultados obtenidos hasta la fecha en pacientes cirróticos o con reflujo gastroesofágico son positivos, existen diferencias, en términos de rendimiento, entre algunos de los estudios publicados (fundamentalmente en pacientes con reflujo gastroesofágico). Estas diferencias pueden deberse al diseño de algunos estudios, a la ausencia de una adecuada experiencia con este nuevo procedimiento y finalmente, al protocolo de ingestión de la cápsula. Por todo ello, parecen necesarios nuevos estudios que incluyan series más amplias y cambios en el protocolo de ingestión de la cápsula, con el fin de confirmar los resultados obtenidos hasta la fecha.Descargas
Citas
1. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy Nature 2000;405:417.
2. Ell C, Remke S, May A, Helou L, Henrich R, Mayer G. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002;34:685-689.
3. Lewis BS, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:349-353.
4. Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2003;52:1122-1126.
5. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, Fassler I, Villarejo J, Vahedi K, Bitoun A, Canard JM, Souquet JC, Ponchon T, Florent C, Gay G. Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003;35:576-584.
6. Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bolz G, Hahne M, Jakobs R, Siegel E, Weickert U, Adamek HE, Riemann JF. Capsule Endoscopy versus Push Enteroscopy in Patients with Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41:377-382.
7. Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A, Yassin K, Katz D, Guttman N, Migdal M. Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computed tomography in patients with suspected Crohn´s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:363-367.
8. de Franchis R, Rondonotti E, Abbiati C, Beccari G, Merighi A, Pinna A, Villa E. Capsule enteroscopy in small bowel transplantation. Dig Liver Dis 2003;35:728-731.
9. Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A, Jacob H, Shreiver R, Kadirkamanathan S, Lavy A, Lewkowicz S, Scapa E, Shofti R, Swain P, Zaretsky A. A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1431-1438.
10. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, Foschia F, Mutignani M, Perri V, Vecchioli A, Brizi MG, Picciocchi A, Marano P. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002;123:999-1005.
11. Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex DK, Maglinte D, Lappas J. Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1295-1298.
12. Lapalus MG, Saurin JC. Complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy: gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2003;27:909-921.
13. Daneshmend TK, Bell GD, Logan RF. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey. Gut 1991;32:12-15.
14. Froehlich F, Gonvverns JJ, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 1994;26:231-234.
15. Gralnek IM, Rabinovitz R, Afik D, Eliakim R. A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: Initial evaluation in healthy volunteers. Endoscopy 2006;38:913-918.
16. Johanson JF. Epidemiology of esophageal and supraesophageal reflux injuries. Am J Med 2000;108(Suppl 4A):99S-103S.
17. Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1448-1456.
18. Farup C, Kleinman L, Sloan S, Ganoczy D, Chee E, Lee C, Revicki D. The impact of nocturnal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:45-52.
19. Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Savarino V. Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive feflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18:1091-1098.
20. Sharma P, Falk GW, Weston AP, Reker D, Johnston M, Sampliner RE. Dysplasia and cancer in a large multicenter cohort of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:566-572.
21. Inadomi JM, Sampliner R, Lagergren J, Lieberman D, Fendrick AM, Vakil N. Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:176-186.
22. Neu B, Wettschureck E, Rösch T. Is esophageal capsule endoscopy feasible? Results of a pilot. Endoscopy 2003;35:957-961.
23. Ramirez FC, Shaukat MS, Young MA, Johnson DA, Akins R. Feasibility and safety of string wireless capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of Barrett´s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:741-746.
24. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Shlomi I, Suissa A, Eisen GM. A novel diagnostic tool for detecting oesophageal pathology: the PillCam oesophageal video capsule. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:1083-1089.
25. Eliakim R, Sharma VK, Yassin K, Adler SN, Jacob H, Cave DR, Sachdev R, Mitty RD, Hartmann D, Schilling D, Riemann JF, Bar-Meir S, Bardan E, Fennerty B, Eisen G, Faigel D, Lewis BS, Fleischer DE. A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:572-8.
26. Koslowsky B, Jacob H, Eliakim R, Adler SN. PillCam ESO in esophageal studies: Improved diagnostic yield of 14 fps. Endoscopy 2006; 38:27-30.
27. Sharma P, Wani S, Rastogi A, Bansal A, Higbee A, Mathur S, Esquivel R, Camargo L, Sampliner R. The diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus: A blinded, prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1-8.
28. Lin O, Schembre D, Mergener K, Spaulding W, Lomah N, Ayub K, Brandabur JJ, Bredfeldt J, Drennan F, Gluck M, Jinareck GC, McCormick SE, Patterson D, Kozarek RA. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for a diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:577-583.
29. Sanchez-Yagüe A, Caunedo-Alvarez A, Garcia-Montes JM, Romero J, Pellicer-Bautista FJ, Herrerias-Gutierrez JM. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:977-983.
30. Lay CS, Tsai YT, Teg C, Shyu WS, Guo WS, Wu KL, Lo KJ. Endoscopic variceal prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices. Hepatology 1997; 25:1346–1350.
31. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:475–505.
32. Conn HO, Lindenmuth WW, May CJ, Ramsby GR. Prophylactic portacaval anastomosis. A tale of two studies. Medicine 1972;51:27–40.
33. Pagliaro L, D'Amico G, Sorenson TIA, Lebrec D, Burroughs AK, Morabito A, Tine F, Politi F, Traina M. Prevention of first bleeding in cirrhosis. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of non-surgical treatment. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117:59–70.
34. Kovacs TOG, Jensen DM. Initial management of UGI hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1999:1554–1566.
35. Sarin S, Lamba GS, Kumar M, Misra A, Murthy NS. Comparison of endoscopic ligation and propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:988–993.
36. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review. Hepatology 1995; 22:332–354.
37. Jensen D. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1620-1630.
38. D´Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Cales P, et al. Diagnosis of portal hypertension: how and when. In: De Franchis R, ed. Proceedings of the Third Baveno International Consensus Workshop on Definitions, Methology and Therapeutic Strategies. Oxford: Blackwell Science 2001; 36-63.
39. Madhotra R, Mokhashi M, Willner I, Hawes RH, Reuben A. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:807-12.
40. Ramirez FC, Hakim S, Tharalson EM, Shaukat MS, Akins R. Feasibility and safety of string wireless capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal varices. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1065-71.
41. Eisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A, Schwartz J, Faigel D, Rondonotti E, Villa F, Weizman E, Yassin K, de Franchis R. The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: A prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy 2006;38:31-5.
42. Lapalus MG, Dumortier J, Fumex F, Roman S, Lot M, Prost B, Mion F, Ponchon T. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: A prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance. Endoscopy 2006;38:36-41.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2008 Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es publicada por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra (España), quien conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright ) sobre el artículo publicado y favorece y permite la difusión del mismo bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0). Esta licencia permite copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente el artículo, siempre que siempre que se cite la autoría y la publicación inicial en Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, y se distinga la existencia de esta licencia de uso.
