Differential effects of diabetes education programs by levels of HbA1c and the presence of chronic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes

Authors

  • M. De los Santos-Roig Dpto. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Granada
  • M. Fernández Alcántara Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Granada
  • T. Guardia Archilla Unidad de Gestión Clínica del SErv. Endocrinología y Nutrición. H.U.San Cecilio (Granada)
  • A. Molina Unidad de Gestión Clínica del SErv. Endocrinología y Nutrición. H.U.Virgen de las Nieves(Granada)
  • D. Casares Unidad de Gestión Clínica del SErv. Endocrinología y Nutrición. H.U.Virgen de las Nieves(Granada)
  • I. Ruiz González Unidad de Gestión Clínica del SErv. Endocrinología y Nutrición. H.U.San Cecilio (Granada)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0340

Keywords:

Type 1 diabetes. Metabolic control. Intensive education program. Skill practice. Self-care.

Abstract

Background. Diabetes Education Programs (DEP) that improve metabolic control are applied to a wide variety of patient types. The aim is to test whether DEPs work differently depending on the patient profile.

Materials and Methods. Thirty-six type 1 diabetics participated. They were divided into four groups according to their haemoglobin levels (range: 7-13 %) and into two groups according to the presence or absence of complications. The ECODI scale for assessing diabetes knowledge and the Frequency of Self-Care scale were completed by all patients.

Results. The results showed that HbA1c decreased after the DEP, with some areas of self-care also improving. There were no changes, however, to diet or exercise.

Conclusions. DEP appear to work better in patients with worse control and with complications, suggesting that they have a certain role to play in prevention. Their lack of impact on diet or exercise, would suggest that the DEPs require improvement to include psychological strategies that motivate lasting lifestyle changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. SHICHIRI M, OHKUBO Y, KISHIKAWA H, WAKE N. Long term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diab Care 2000; 23: Suppl. 2: B21-B2.

2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199309303291401

3. CHODOSH J, MORTON SC, MOJICA W, MAGLIONE M, SUTTORP MJ,

HILTON L et al. Meta-analysis: chronic disease self- management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 427-438.

https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007

4. RICKHEIM PL, WEAVER TW, FLADER JL, KENDALL DM. Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study. Diab Care 2002; 25: 269-274.

https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.2.269

5. RUIZ-GONZÁLEZ I, FERNÁNDEZ-ALCÁNTARA M, GUARDIA-ARCHILLA T, MOLINA A, CASARES D Y DE LOS SANTOS-ROIG M. Educación Diabetológica, ¿Qué podemos cambiar?: Efectos a largo plazo de un programa intensivo-práctico sobre el autocuidado del paciente con Diabetes tipo 1. Rev Paraninfo Digital, 2012; 16.

6. BUENO JM, MARCO MD, LEAL A, OROZCO D, MIRA JJ. An evaluation study of a scale of diabetological education in primary care. Aten Primaria 1993; 11: 344-348.

7. TOOBERT DJ, HAMPSON SE, GLASGOW RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diab Care 2000; 23: 943-950.

https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.7.943

8. American Diabetes Association: Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (Position Statement). Diab Care 2002; 25 (Suppl. 1): S28-S32.

https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S28

9. GONZÁLEZ M, GALÍNDEZ A. Estudio del coste de hospitalización de las complicaciones de la diabetes. An Sist Sanit Navar 1997; 20: 71-76.

10. CHILLARÓN JJ, FLORES-LE-ROUX JA, GODAY A, BENAIGES D, CARRERA MJ, PUIG J et al. Síndrome metabólico y diabetes mellitus tipo 1: prevalencia y factores relacionados. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010; 63: 423-429.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-8932(10)70063-4

11. ÁLVAREZ-SALA LA, SUÁREZ C, MANTILLA T, FRANCH J, RUILOPE LM, BANEGAS JR et al. Estudio PREVENCAT: control del riesgo cardiovascular en atención primaria. Med Clin 2005; 124: 406-410.

https://doi.org/10.1157/13072841

Published

2014-06-30

How to Cite

1.
De los Santos-Roig M, Fernández Alcántara M, Guardia Archilla T, Molina A, Casares D, Ruiz González I. Differential effects of diabetes education programs by levels of HbA1c and the presence of chronic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2014 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 4];37(2):235-40. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/23952

Issue

Section

Short articles

Similar Articles

<< < 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.