Governance and legitimacy in Colombian sports federations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v45i0.89338Keywords:
Governance, legitimacy, sports federations, Play the GameAbstract
This article was prepared based on the research carried out by the University of Applied and Environmental Sciences and the Colombian Olympic Committee, in which the state of governance and legitimacy of Colombian sports federations is determined. The results show the existence of weaknesses related to gender imbalance, as well as solidarity with athletes and lower-ranking institutions; the study established the need to structure the creation of a good governance observatory. The sample was taken from 8 federations out of a total of 19, in which their participation aims at the recognition of indirect actions that would present elements of transparency, democracy, separation of powers and democracy, through punctual elements such as their web page, statutes, government plans, among others; these to be shown as the basis of governance and legitimacy. The research focused on evaluating the national sports federations, based on a study carried out by the international organization Play the Game that evaluated the state of governance and the legitimacy of the international sports federations, which are part of the Olympic program.
References
Arias, A. (2017) La gobernanza en el deporte: la legitimidad en la federación colombiana de esgrima, estudio de caso. Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales, Bogotá Colombia.
Arias-Castaño, A. M., Gómez-Solano, J. H.., Restrepo-Herrera, N.., Ordoñez-Saavedra, N.., Rivera-Castellanos, L. V.., Obando-Díaz, L. C.., Colorado-Castaño, A. A.., & Ramos Acosta, J. (2022). La gobernanza y la legitimidad en el deporte: los procesos democráticos de los clubes deportivos de Chía, Cundinamarca. Revista Digital: Actividad Física Y Deporte, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31910/rdafd.v8.n1.2022.2186
Arias, A., Ramos, J., Gómez, J., Ordoñez, N., Sandino, M., Cardona, L., Castellanos, N., Melendro, C., Galindo, E., Bolívar, H., Dueñas, C., Aranda, I., Pérez, M., Calle, María (2021). National sports governance observer country report: Colombia. Adams, S (Ed.), National sports governance observer 2 (pp. 87 - 1049). Aarhus.
Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public Management Reform, International review of Administrative sciences.V.66 pp45-55 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852300661005.
Canales, A. (2009). La teoria del principal – agente, en el análisis de la politica científica. X Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa. Mexico.
Calvert, McCubbins & Weingast (1989), a theory of political Control an Agency discretión, Journal of polities. p.588-611 https://doi.org/10.2307/2111064
Coldeportes. (2014). Declaración de Berlín 2013. Conferencia Internacional de Ministros y Altos Funcionarios responsables de la Educación Física y el Deporte – MINEPS V-. Bogotá: Coldeportes.
Coleman, A. (2007). Corporate Governance and Shareholder Value Maximization: An African perspective. African Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2007.00165.x
Colombia, (1995). Ley 181.
Colombia (1995) Sistema Nacional del Deporte SND.
Colombia (1995) decreto 1228. Legislación deportiva vigente en Colombia.
Cunuhay, N., & Toapanta, D. (2016). Equidad de género. Ed Latacunga, Universidad técnica de Cotopaxi. Ecuador. P 9 http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/3851.
De la Garza, D. & Barredo, D. (2019) Gobernanza en el contexto contemporáneo. https://doi.org/10.33539/consensus.2017.v22n2.1269 España.
Geeraert, A. (2015). Sport governance observer 2015. the liegitimacy crisis in international sport governance. Copenhagen: Play the game.
Gómez S, Opazo M, Marti C. (2007) Características Estructurales De Las Organizaciones Deportivas. Navarra. https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0704.pdf, p.5
Hoye, R. (2007 ). Sport Governance . Elsevier .Ed Roudledge.London: Elsiver. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080466965
IOC. (2017). International Olympic Committee. Recuperate April 2017, from Good Governance.
Klijn, E. & Koppenjan, J. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks, a new approach to problem solving and decision-making New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643457
Ley de Transparencia (2016) ciudad de México.
Martínez, Brouchoud, M. (2010) Gobernanza y legitimidad democrática, Reflexión política, Vol. 12. N. 23, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia. P.96-107
Ministerio del Deporte (2020) Colombia.
Monsiváis, C. (2013) La democracia como política pública: oportunidades para el fortalecimiento democrático, Revista de estudios sociales N. 47 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7440/res47.2013.02.
Mouffe, C. (1999) El retorno a lo político. Comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical. Ed Paidós. Madrid
O Donell & otros (2007) Demoracia/ estado/ciudadania ISBN: 978-9972-612-30-5 P. 27
OEA, (2013) El acceso a la información pública, un derecho para ejercer otros derechos.
Otzen, T., Manterola. (2017) Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio, International Journal of morphology 35(1) https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037 pp 227-232
Piñar, J. (2015). Acceso a la información y protección de datos, Ed Reus s.a. DOI: 10.30462/9788429018264. Madrid. España.
Play The Game (2015).
Rúa, C. (2013). Legitimidad en el ejercicio del poder en el estado social del derecho. Revista Ius et Praxis, Año 19, Nº 2, 2013, pp. 85 - 122 ISSN 0717 – 2877.
Soto, V. (2018). La vieja y nueva separación de poderes en la relación entre el poder ejecutivo y el poder legislativo. Estudios constitucionales 16(2) 449-480 http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-52002018000200449&lng=es&nrm=iso.
Schumann, M. (1995): «Managing Legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches», Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, número. 3, p.571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tamayo & Tamayo, M. (2012). El proceso de la Investigación Científica, México, Ed Limusa Noriega eds. 175p. ISBN 968- 18 5872-7
Unesco (2013).
Zaum, Dominik (2013), the Authority of international Administrations in international society, Review of international studies, Vol. 32/3, Cambridge Journal, United Kingdom.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 José Ramos Acosta, Ana María Arias Castaño, Julie Hortencia Gómez Solano, Néstor Ordoñez Saavedra, Ruby Lorena Carrillo Barbosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (eg, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Is allowed and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to a subpoena more Early and more of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content (BOAI, http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess) on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The authors may download the papers from the journal website, or will be provided with the PDF version of the article via e-mail.