Uso de medios electrónicos por las federaciones deportivas brasileñas en la educación antidopaje (Use of electronic media by Brazilian sports federations in anti-doping education)

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.97843

Palabras clave:

Educación, Dopaje, Antidopaje, Atleta, Deporte

Resumen

La información y la educación antidopaje (EAD) son derechos de los atletas, y su proximidad a las federaciones deportivas brasileñas (FDB) puede mejorar la lucha contra el dopaje. Objetivos: analizar la EAD promovida por las FDB en sus sítios electronicos y redes sociales (SRS) y comprobar la relación entre este dato, el número de sancionados (NS) y la posibilidad de medallas (PMe) en los últimos Juegos Olímpicos y Paralímpicos de verano y invierno (JOP). Se realizaron búsquedas en el SRS de las FDB sobre antidopaje en los últimos 180 días; en los sitios web de la WADA, de la Autoridad Brasileña de Control de Dopaje y Federaciones Internacionales para cuantificar a todo el personal sancionado; además de levantar los resultados de los últimos JOP. Resultados: las FDB ofrecen poca ADE en sus SRS, de las 41 entidades analizadas, 34 (82.9%) no tenían el Código Brasileño Antidopaje para el acceso en sus sitios web; y 21 (51.2%) no publicaron nada sobre el tema durante los seis meses de seguimiento.No se evidenció la correlación entre el EAD disponible y el NS o PMe. Conclusión: EAD en Brasil necesita avanzar mucho, y los FDB deben realizar acciones de EAD para sus atletas.

Palavras clave: Educación; Dopaje; Antidopaje; Atleta; Deporte.

Abstract. Information and anti-doping education (ADE) are athletes' rights and their proximity to the Brazilian sports federations (BSF) can aid in the fight against doping. Objectives: to analyze the ADE promoted by the BSF on their websites and social media (WSM) and to verify the relationship among this data, the number of athletes and sanctioned personnel (NSP) and the possibility of medals (PMe) in the last Summer and Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games (OPG) (Tokyo, 2020 and Beijing, 2022). Searches were carried out in WSM of the BSF regarding anti-doping in the last 180 days; on the websites of the World Anti-doping Agency, the Brazilian Authority for Doping Control, and International Federations to quantify all the athletes and personnel sanctioned; and in addition to surveying the results of the last OPG. Results: The BSF offer little ADE on their WSM, of the 41 entities analyzed, 34 (82.9%) did not have the Brazilian Anti-Doping Code for access on their websites; and 21 (51.2%) did not post anything on the subject during the six months of monitoring. The correlation between the available ADE and the NSP or PMe was not evidenced. Conclusion: ADE in Brazil must make great advances and BSF should carry out ADE actions for their athletes.

Keywords: Education; Doping; Play True; Athlete; Sport

Citas

Aith, F. M. A. (2013). Regulação antidoping e saúde pública: Limites à exposição humana ao risco sanitário e a glória des-portiva. Revista de Saúde Pública, 47(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047005129.

Blank, C., Flatscher-Thöni, M., Gatterer, K., Happ, E., Schobersberger, W., & Stühlinger, V. (2021). Doping sanctions in sport: knowledge and perception of (legal) consequences of doping-an explorative study in Austria. Journal of Risk and Fi-nancial Management, 14(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120603.

Blank, C., Gatterer , K., Overbye, M., Schobersberger, W., Streicher, B., & Petróczi, A. (2022). GRADE IT-a literacy-based assessment tool for generating research-based assessment data to evidence the impact of anti-doping education via athletes' capability to make the right decision. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 15(4), 842192. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.842192.

Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a commit-tee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans.

Blumrodt, J., & Kitchen, P. J. (2015). The tour de France: Corporate sponsorships and doping accusations. Journal of Busi-ness Strategy, 36(2), 41-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2014-0046.

Boardley, I., Chandler, M., Susan H., Backhouse, S. H., & Petróczi, A. (2021). Co-creating a social science research agenda for clean sport: an international Delphi study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 92(103161). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103161.

Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The international review of research in open and distance learning, 13(1):87-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1027.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

Deng, Z., Guo, J., Wang, D., Huang, T., & Chen, Z. (2022). Effectiveness of the World Anti‑doping Agency’s e‑learning programme for anti‑doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non‑athletes. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 17(1), 31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1.

Dunn, M., & White, V. (2011). The epidemiology of anabolic–androgenic steroid use among Australian secondary school students. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(1), 10-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.05.004

Engelberg T., Moston, S., & Skinner, J. (2012). Public perception of sport anti-doping policy in Australia. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19(1), 84-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2011.590556.

Fagher, K., Dahlström, O., Jacobsson, J., Timpka, T., & Lexell, J. (2020). Prevalence of sports-related injuries and illness-es in paralympic athletes. PM&R: The Journal of Injury, Function and Rehabilitation, 12(3), 271-280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12211.

García-Grimau, E., Casado, A., & de la Vega, R. (2021). Evolución de la investigación psicosocial del dopaje en el deporte de competición: una revisión narrativa (Evolution of doping in elite sport from the perspective of social sciences: a narra-tive review). Retos, 39, 973-980. doi: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.80834.

Gleaves, J., & Christiansen, A. V. (2019). Athletes’ perspectives on WADA and the code: A review and analysis. Interna-tional Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11, 341-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1577901.

Goodwin, D., Johnston, K., Gustafson, P., Elliott, M., Thurmeier, R., & Kuttai, H. (2009). It’s okay to be a quad: wheel-chair rugby players sense of community. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 26(2),102-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.26.2.102.

Horwitz, H., Andersen, J.T., & Dalhoff, K.P. (2019). Health consequences of androgenic anabolic steroid use. Journal of Internal Medicine, 285(3), 333-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12850.

Hurst, P., Ring, C., & Kavussanu, M. (2020). An evaluation of UK athletics’ clean sport programme in preventing doping in junior elite athletes. Performance Enhancement and Health, 7(3,4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2019.100155.

Lacka, E., Wong, T.C. & Haddoud, M. (2020). Can digital technologies improve students' efficiency? Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 163, 104099. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099.

Mazzeo, F., Monda, V., Santamaria, S., Nigro E., Valenzano, A., Villano, I., Cibelli, G., Messina, A., & Messina, G. (2018b). Anti-doping program: An important factor in the promotion and protection of the integrity of sport and ath-lete’s health. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 58(7-8), 1135-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.17.07722-2.

Mazzeo, F., Altavilla, G., D’elia, F., & Raiola, G. (2018a). Development of doping in sports: Overview and analysis. Jour-nal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(3), 1669-1677. doi: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.03244.

Mountjoy, M., Costa, A., Budgett, R., Dvorak, J., Engebretsen, L., Miller, S., Moran, J., Foster, J., & Carr, J. (2018). Health promotion through sport: International sport federations' priorities, actions and opportunities. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(1), 54-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097900.

Nicholls, A. R., Morley, D., Thompson, M. A., Huang, C., Abt, G., Rothwell, M., Cope, E., & Ntoumanis, N. (2020). The effects of the iPlay Clean education programme on doping attitudes and susceptibility to use banned substances among high-level adolescent athletes from the UK: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. International Journal on Drug Policy, 82(102820). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.

Ohl, F., Fincoeur, B., & Schoch, L. (2021). Fight against doping as a social performance: The case of the 2015–2016 Rus-sian anti-doping crisis. Cultural Sociology,15(3), 386-408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520977345.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, CIÊNCIA E CULTURA. (2022). Reimaginar nossos futuros juntos: um novo contrato social para a educação. Comissão Internacional sobre os Futuros da Educação. UNES-CO, Boadilla del Monte: Fundación SM. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381115.

Palka, M. Z., Bigosińska, M., & Spieszny, M. (2022). The attitudes and beliefs of paralympians and athletes with disabilities on doping in sport. Antropomotoryka. Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences, 99(32), 9-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9431.

Peters, C., Schulz T, Oberhoffer R, & Michna H. (2009). Doping und Dopingprävention: Kenntnisse, Einstellungen und Erwartungen von Athleten und Trainern (Doping and doping prevention: knowledge, attitudes and expectations of ath-letes and coaches). Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, 60(3), 73-78.

Petróczi, A., Norman, P., & Brueckner, S. (2017). Can we better integrate the role of anti-doping in sports and society? A psychological approach to contemporary value-based prevention, in acute topics in anti-doping. Medicine and Sports Sci-ence, 62, 160-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000460726.

Pope Junior, H. G., Wood, R. I., Rogol, A., Nyberg, F., Bowers, L., & Bhasin, S. (2014). Adverse health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs: An endocrine society scientific statement. Endocrine Reviews, 35(3), 341–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2013-1058.

Ranby, K.W., Aiken, L. S., Mackinnon, D. P., Elliot, D. L., Moe, E. L., McGinnis, W., & Goldberg, L. (2009). A media-tion analysis of the ATHENA intervention for female athletes: Prevention of athletic-enhancing substance use and un-healthy weight loss behaviors. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(10), 1069-1083. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp025.

Ribeiro, M. L. (2010). A afetividade na relação educativa. Estudos de Psicologia, 27(3), 403-412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2010000300012.

Rodrigues, A. V. S. (2022). A necessária educação antidopagem. Ciência Hoje, 386, 1-7. Retrieved from https://cienciahoje.org.br/artigo/a-necessaria-educacao-antidopagem/.

Shelley, J., Thrower, S. N., & Petróczi, A. (2021). Racing clean in a tainted world: a qualitative exploration of the experi-ences and views of clean British elite distance runners on doping and anti-doping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 673087. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673087.

Silva, H.C., Miranda, E.F., Andrade, M.C., Brandão, F.M.V., Couteiro, R.P., Brito M.V.H., Furtado, J.C.C., & Chaves, R.O. (2019). Heart at risk: electronic educational game with information on doping in athletes. Revista Brasileira de Me-dicina do Esporte, 25(5), 379-383. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220192505217459.

Silva, P.R.P.; Ribeiro, C.H.V.; & Costa, L.P. (2013). A cobertura esportiva dos Jogos Olímpicos de Londres 2012: a te-matização do "doping" no portal de notícias G1. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 27(3), 437-446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-55092013005000019.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.

Walpurgis, K., Thomas, A., Geyer, H., Mareck, U., & Thevis, M. (2020). Dietary supplement and food contaminations and their implications for doping controls. Foods, 9(8), 1012. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081012.

Weber, K., Patterson, L. B., & Blank, C. (2022). An exploration of doping-related perceptions and knowledge of disabled elite athletes in the UK and Austria. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 58, 102061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102061.

Woolf, J. R. (2020). An examination of anti-doping education initiatives from an educational perspective: Insights and rec-ommendations for improved educational design. Performance Enhancement & Health, 8(2-3), 100178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2020.100178.

Woolway, T., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., & Petróczi, A. (2020). “Doing what is right and doing it right”: a mapping re-view of athletes’ perception of anti-doping legitimacy. International Journal on Drug Policy, 84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865.

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2020b). Athletes’ anti-doping right act. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/athlete_act_en.pdf

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2021a). International Standard for Education. Retrieved from https://www.WADA-ama.org/en/resources/world-anti-doping-program/international-standard-education-ise.

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2023). Anti-Doping Electronic Learning (ADEL). Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/education-and-training/adel.

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2020a). WADA strategic plan 2020-2024. Leading Anti-Doping in a New Era. Retrieved from https://www.WADA-ama.org/en/resources/strategic-plan#resource-download.

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2021b). 2020 Anti-Doping Testing Figures. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/2020_anti-doping_testing_figures_en.pdf01/2019_adrv_report_external_final_12_december_2021_0_0.pdf .

WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. (2022). Code signatories. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/world-anti-doping-code/code-signatories.

Zachos, G., Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E., & Anagnostopoulos, J. (2018). Social media in higher education: A review. Educa-tion Sciences, 8(4), 194-206. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040194.

Zhumabayeva, G., Kapanova, G., Vinnikov, D., Bakasheva, M., Abdulla, V., & Grjibovski, A. (2022). Knowledge and experience of Kazakhstan athletes in anti‑doping and the impact of past educational intervention. Substance Abuse Treat-ment, Prevention, and Policy, 17(1), 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00461-7.

Publicado

2023-06-28

Cómo citar

V. Siqueira Rodrigues, A., Machado Reis, V., & Camillo Martinez, E. (2023). Uso de medios electrónicos por las federaciones deportivas brasileñas en la educación antidopaje (Use of electronic media by Brazilian sports federations in anti-doping education). Retos, 49, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.97843

Número

Sección

Artículos de carácter científico: trabajos de investigaciones básicas y/o aplicadas

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a