El efecto de la tarea motora dual sobre el control postural estático y dinámico y la clasificación de la dificultad de la tarea motora - Revisión sistemática (The effect of the motor dual-task on static and dynamic postural control and classification of the motor task difficulty - Systematic Review)

Autores/as

  • Marina Saraiva FADEUP, Robocorp - IPC, CIAFEL
  • João Paulo Vilas-Boas LABIOMEP-UP, Faculty of Sports and CIFI2D, the University of Porto
  • Joel Marouvo FADEUP, Robocorp - IPC
  • Maria António Castro Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, CEMMPRE, Sector of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Robocorp - IPC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.93387

Resumen

Muchas actividades diarias requieren múltiples tareas e implican la integración de habilidades cognitivas y motoras, de las cuales depende el resultado. Muchos estudios abordan la influencia de las tareas cognitivas en la marcha y el control postural, pero pocos estudios analizan el efecto de otra tarea motora durante la marcha o el control postural. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo analizar las tareas motoras utilizadas en los estudios de duales tareas motoras y clasificar las tareas motoras en función de su nivel de dificultad. La revisión de la literatura se realizó de acuerdo con las guias de PRISMA en las bases de datos: Medline, Web on Science y Scopus durante diciembre de 2019, utilizando las palabras clave: tarea motora dual, tarea motora secundaria, marcha y control postural. Incluyó estudios observacionales basados en los efectos de la tarea motora dual en el control postural estático y dinámico, publicados en los últimos diez años. N = 215 estudios se encontraron dentro de las bases de datos, y dieciséis estudios se incluyeron en esta revisión.  Un estudio analizó la marcha con una tarea motora secundaria de diferentes niveles de complejidad y tres estudios analizaron la tarea motora primaria (marcha) en diferentes niveles de dificultad o condiciones y todos encontraron que las tareas más complejas conducen a un rendimiento de la marcha más pobre. En conclusión, se sugiere una clasificación de las tareas motoras según su nivel de complejidad y sugiriendo la necesidad de más estudios con tareas motoras de diferentes niveles de dificultad. Los parámetros de control postural estáticos y dinámicos analizados en esta revisión se vieron afectados negativamente en comparación con la tarea motora simple, independientemente de la edad o la condición clínica.

Abstract. Many daily activities require performing multiple tasks and involve the integration of cognitive and motor skills, on which the outcome depends. Many studies approach the influence of cognitive tasks on gait and postural control, but few studies analyze the effect of another motor task during gait or postural control. This review aims to analyze the motor tasks used in motor dual-tasks studies and classify motor tasks as to their difficulty level. The literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines in the databases: Medline, Web on Science, and Scopus during December 2019, using the key-words: motor dual-task, secondary motor task, gait, and postural control. It included observational studies based on the effects of motor dual-tasking in static and dynamic postural control, published in the last ten years. N = 215 studies were found within the databases, and this review included sixteen studies. One study analyzed gait with secondary motor task of different levels of complexity. Three studies analyzed the primary motor task (gait) at different difficulty levels or conditions. They all found that more complex tasks lead to poorer gait performance.In conclusion, a classification of the motor tasks is suggested according to their complexity level and suggests the need for more studies with motor tasks of different levels of difficulty. The static and dynamic postural control parameters analyzed in this review were negatively affected compared to the simple motor task, regardless of age or clinical condition.

Citas

Abbruzzese, L. D., Rao, A. K., Bellows, R., Figueroa, K., Levy, J., Lim, E. & Puccio, L. (2014). Effects of manual task complexity on gait parameters in school-aged children and adults. Gait Posture, 40(4), 658–663.

Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K. & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 35 (3), 715–728.

Arce-Cifuentes, B., Bas-Cerdá, A. & Garcia-Masso, X. (2020) Efectos de la auto-selección del foco de atención durante el aprendizaje de una tarea de control postural. RETOS. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 37.

Asai, T., Misu, S., Doi, T., Yamada, M. & Ando, H. (2014). Effects of dual-tasking on control of trunk movement during gait: Respective effect of manual and cognitive-task. Gait Posture, 39(1), 54–59.

Baldan, A. M. S. & Elmauer, J. C. (2015). Interferência da dupla tarefa no desempenho da marcha de indivíduos com hemiparesia pós AVE. J Heal. Sci Inst., 33 (4), 365–370.

Bayot, M.; Dujardin, K.; Tard, C.; Defebvre, L.; Bonnet, C.T.; Allart, E.; Delval, A. (2018). The interaction between cognition and motor control: A theoretical framework for dual-task interference effects on posture, gait initiation, gait and turning. Neurophysiol Clin., Dec;48(6):361-375

Beauchet, O. et al. (2009). Stops walking when talking: A predictor of falls in older adults? Eur. J. Neurol., 16 (7), 786–795.

Beurskens, R., Steinberg, F., Antoniewicz, F., Wolff, W. & Granacher, U. (2016). Neural Correlates of Dual-Task Walking: Effects of Cognitive versus Motor Interference in Young Adults. Neural Plast., 2016:8032180.

Beurskens, R. & Bock, O. (2013). Does the walking task matter? Influence of different walking conditions on dual-task performances in young and older persons. Hum. Mov. Sci., 32(6), 1456–1466.

Bond, J. M. & Morris, M. (2000). Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: Their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 81 (1), 110–116.

Cherng, R-J., Liang, L-Y., Hwang, I-S. & Chen, J-Y. (2007). The effect of a concurrent task on the walking performance of preschool children. Gait Posture, 26 (2), 231–237.

Demirci, C. S., Kilinc, M. & Aksu, S. (2016). The effect of dual task on clinical balance performance in ataxia patients. Türk Fiz. ve Rehabil. Derg., 27(1), 1–7.

Hoshyari, M., Saemi, E. & Doustan, M. (2022). Motor Learning and Working Memory in Children: The Role of Cognitive-Motor and Motor-Motor Dual-Task Training. Psihologija.

Huang, H. J. & Mercer, V. S. (2001). Dual-Task Methodology: Applications in Studies of Cognitive and Motor Performance in Adults and Children. Pediatr. Phys. Ther.,13 (3), 133–140.

Hunter, S. W., Divine, A., Frengopoulos, C. & Odasso, M. M. (2018). A framework for secondary cognitive and motor tasks in dual-task gait testing in people with mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr., 18, 1–7.

Júnior. R. C. F., Porto, J. M., Marques, N. R., Magnani, P. E. & Abreu, D. C. C. (2017). The effects of a simultaneous cognitive or motor task on the kinematics of walking in older fallers and non-fallers. Hum. Mov. Sci., 51,146–152.

Kachouri, H., Laatar, R., Borji, R., Rebai, H. & Sahli, S. (2020). Using a dual‐task paradigm to investigate motor and cognitive performance in children with intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil., 33 (2), 172-179.

Kelly, V. E., Janke, A. A. & Shumway-Cook, A. (2010). Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res, 207 (1-2), 65–73.

Krampe, R. T., Schaefer, S., Lindenberger, U. & Baltes, P. B. (2011). Lifespan changes in multi-tasking: Concurrent walking and memory search in children, young, and older adults. Gait Posture, 33 (3), 401–405.

Kuo, H.T., Yeh, N-C., Yang, Y-R., Hsu, W-C., Liao, Y-Y., Wang, R-Y. (2022). Efects of diferent dual task training on dual task walking and responding brain activation in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Scientifc Reports, 12:8490.

Laessoe, U., Hoeck, H. C., Simonsen, O. & Voigt, M. (2008). Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking. Human Movement Science, 27, 496-512.

Leone, C., Feys, P., Moumdjian, L., D’Amico, E., Zappia, M & Patti, F. (2017). Cognitive-motor dual-task interference: A systematic review of neural correlates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 75, 348–360.

Liu, P. & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 553-568.

Liu, Y-C., Yang, Y-R., Tsai, Y-A., Wang, R-Y. & Lu, C-F. (2018). Brain Activation and Gait Alteration During Cognitive and Motor Dual Task Walking in Spectroscopy Study. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 26 (12), 2416–2423.

Makizako, H., Furuna, T., Ihira, H. & Shimada, H. (2013). Age-related Differences in the Influence of Cognitive Task Performance on Postural Control Under Unstable Balance Conditions. Int. J. Gerontol., 7 (4), 199–204.

Marchese, R., Bove, M. & Abbruzzese, G. (2003). Effect of cognitive and motor tasks on postural stability in Parkinson´s Disease: A posturographic study. Movement Disorders, 18 (6), 652-658.

McIsaac, T. L., Lamberg, E. M. & Muratori, L. M. (2015). Building a Framework for a Dual Task Taxonomy. Biomed Res. Int., 2015:591475.

Mofateh, R., Salehi, R., Negahban, H., Mehravar, M. & Tajali, S. (2017). Effects of cognitive versus motor dual-task on spatiotemporal gait parameters in healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients with and without fall history. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord., 18, 8–14.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7):e1000097.

Nordin, E., Moe-Nilssen, R., Ramnemark, A. & Lundin-Olsson, L. (2010). Changes in step-width during dual-task walking predicts falls. Gait Posture, 32 (1), 92–97.

Oh-Park, M., Holtzer, R., Mahoney, J., Wang, C., Raghavan, P. & Verghese, J. (2013) Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization: pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res, 25 (1), 99–106.

O´Shea, S., Morris, M. E. & Iansek, R. (2002). Dual Task Interference During Gait in People With Parkinson Disease: Effects of Motor Versus Cognitive Secondary Tasks. Phys. Ther., 82 (9), 888–897.

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-Task Interference in Simple Tasks: Data and Theory. Phychological Bull., 116 (2), 220–244.

Peterson, M. L., Christou, E. & Rosengren, K. (2005). Children achieve adult-like sensory integration during stance at 12-years-old. Gait Posture, 23 (4), 455–463.

Plummer, P. & Eskes, G. (2015). Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performance: a framework for research and clinical practice. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9, 1–7.

Plummer, P., Eskes, G., Wallace, S., Giuffrida, C., Fraas, M., Campbell, G., Clifton, K-L. & Skidmore E. R. (2013). Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil., 94 (12), 2565-2574.

Rabaglietti, E., De Lorenzo, A. & Brustio, P. R. (2019). The role of working memory on dual-task cost during walking performance in childhood. Front. Psychol., 10: 1754.

Remaud, A., Boyas, S., Lajoie, Y. & Bilodeau, M. (2013). Attentional focus influences postural control and reaction time performances only during challenging dual‑task conditions in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res., 231 (2): 219–229.

Schott, N. & Klotzbier, T. J. (2018). Profiles of Cognitive-Motor Interference During Walking in Children: Does the Motor or the Cognitive Task Matter? Front. Psychol., 9: 947.

Tang, P-F., Yang, H-J., Peng, Y-C. & Chen, H-Y. (2015). Motor dual-task Timed Up & Go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single-task Timed Up & Go test. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 15 (2), 204–210.

Vallis, L. A. & McFadyen, B. J. (2005). Children use different anticipatory control strategies than adults to circumvent an obstacle in the travel path. Exp. Brain Res., 167 (1), 119–127.

Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O’Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In 2019: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

Woollacott, M. & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture, 16, 1–14.

Yogev, G., Hausdorff, J. M. & Giladi, N. (2008). The Role of Executive Function and Attention in Gait. Mov. Disord., 23 (3), 329–342.

Yogev-Seligmann, G., Rotem-Galili, Y., Mirelman, A., Dickstein, R., Giladi, N. & Hausdorff, J. M. (2010). How Does Explicit Prioritization Alter Walking During Dual-Task Performance? Effects of Age and Sex on Gait Speed and Variability. Phys. Ther., 90 (2), 177–186.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-09-28

Cómo citar

Saraiva, M., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Marouvo, J., & Castro, M. A. (2022). El efecto de la tarea motora dual sobre el control postural estático y dinámico y la clasificación de la dificultad de la tarea motora - Revisión sistemática (The effect of the motor dual-task on static and dynamic postural control and classification of the motor task difficulty - Systematic Review). Retos, 46, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.93387

Número

Sección

Revisiones teóricas, sistemáticas y/o metaanálisis