Solidarity Purchasing Groups as social innovators: an analysis of alternative food networks in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2019.26Keywords:
political consumerism, solidarity purchasing groups, buying power, social innovation, marginalisationAbstract
The marketisation of food and the rise of mass retailers have created an unbalanced supply chain where, above all, small producers and customers are weaker. In contrast to this scenario, in the last twenty years agriculture and food markets have become an increasingly relevant space for the experimentation of innovative social practice in order to fix this anomaly and try to rebalance the distribution of value in the whole supply chain. Solidarity Purchasing Groups (SPGs) are one of these innovations and they could represent one of the most relevant tools to combat the buying power of mass retailers. However, the analysis in the paper shows that SPGs are social innovations that only partially achieve this goal of reducing the economic marginalisation of their suppliers by setting up an alternative distribution channel.
References
AGCM (2012). Indagine conoscitiva sul settore del- la GDO. IC43. Roma.
BEPA (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Brux- elles. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/ pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf.
Bio Bank (2016). Rapporto Bio Bank. Il biologico in Italia secondo i censimenti Bio Bank, dall’ali- mentazione alla cosmesi. Retrieved from www. biobank.it.
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theo- ry? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3-10. Bowman, A., Froud, J., Sukhdev, J., Law, J., Leav- er, A., Moran, M., Williams, K. (2014). The end
of the experiment? From competition to the foundational economy. Manchester: Manches- ter University Press.
Bruni, L., Zamagni, S. (2007). Civil Economy. Efficiency, Equity and Public Happiness. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Bruin, A. (2012). Towards Advancing Under- standing of Social Innovation. In F. H. Werner,
J. Hochgerner, J. Howaldt (eds.), Challenge Social Innovation. Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society (pp. 367-378). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
De Certau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life.
Los Angeles: California University Press.
Dobson, P. W. (2005). Exploiting Buyer Power: Les- sons from the British Grocery Trade. Antitrust Law Journal, 72, 529-562.
Dobson, P. W., & Inderst, R. (2007). Differential Buyer Power and the Waterbed Effect: Do strong Buyers Benefit or Harm Consumers? European Competition Law Review, 28(7), 393-400.
Eggers, W. D., & McMillan, P. (2013). The Solution Revolution: How Business, Government, and Social Enterprises Are Teaming Up to Solve Society’s Toughest Problems. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
European Central Bank (2011). Structural features of distributive trades and their impact on pric- es in the euro area (Occasional Paper Series No. 18). Bruxelles.
European Parliament (2015). Unfair Trading Practices in the Business-to-Business Food Supply Chain. Bruxelles.
Federidistribuzione (2017). La mappa del sistema distributivo in Italia. Retrieved from www.fe- derdistribuzione.it.
Forno, F., Graziano, P. R. (2014). Sustainable com- munity movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 139-157.
Forno, F., Graziano, P. R. (2016). Il consumo critico. Una relazione solidale tra chi acquista e chi produce. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Foros, O., Kind, H. J. (2008). Do Slotting Allowances harm retail competition? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 367-384.
Grasseni, C. (2014). Beyond alternative food net- works. Italy’s solidarity purchasing groups. London: Bloomsbury.
Guidi, R., Andretta, M. (2015). Between resistance and resilience: How do Italian soli- darity purchase groups change in times of crisis and austerity? Partecipazione e Con- flitto, 8(2), 443-477. https://doi.org/10.1285/ i20356609v8i2p443.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISMEA (2018). Rapporto sulla competitività dell’a- groalimentare italiano. Retrieved from www.ismea.it.
Ketchen, D. J., Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of Cluster Analysis in Strategic Management Research: an Analisys and Critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 441-458.
Loconto, A. M. (2014) Institutionalising social inno- vation: an exploration of boundaries, EASST An- nual Conference: Situating Solidarities: social challenges for science and technology studies; Toru (Polonie) / Conference Proceedings.
Lyson, T. A. (2005). Civic Agriculture and Commu- nity Problem Solving. Culture & Agriculture, 27, 92-98.
Maestripieri, L. (2017). Are Solidarity Purchasing Groups a social innovation? A study inspired by social forces. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10, 955-982.
Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shop- ping. Individuals, Consumerism and Collective Action. London: Palgrave.
Moulaert, F., MacCallaum, D., Hillier, J., Vicari, S. (2009). Social Innovation and Territorial Devel- opment. Burlington: Ashgate.
Moulaert, F., MacCallaum, D., Mehmood, A., Ham- douch, A. (2013). General introduction: the re- turn of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice. In F. Moulaert, D. Mac- Callaum, A. Mehmood, A. Hamdouch (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Trans- disciplinary Research. Cheltenham/Northamp- ton: Edward Elgar.
Mulgan, G., Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature and embeddedness: some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76, 107-125.
Nesta (2008). Social Innovation: New approaches to transforming public services (SI/ No. 18). London.
Nicholls, A., Ziegler, R. (2019). The Extended Social Grid Model. In A. Nicholls, R. Ziegler (eds.), Cre- ating (fair) economic space for social innova- tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paltrinieri, R., Spillare, S. (2015). Well-being Shift through Healthy Eating. From Organic Con- sumption to a Paradigm of Alternative Local Development. Rivista Di Studi Sulla Sostenibi- lità, 2, 99-110.
Punji, G., Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application. Journal of Marketing Research, XX (May 1983), 134-148.
Rebughini, P. (2008). Costruire nuovi spazi di con- sumo: i gruppi di acquisto e il sogno della tra- sparenza. In R. Sassatellu, L. Leonini (eds.), Il consumo critico. Significati, pratiche, reti. Bari: Laterza.
Rhodes, S. A. (1995). Market Share Inequality, the HHI, and Other Measures of the Firm-Composition of a Market. Review of Industrial Organization, 10(6), 657-674.
Seyfang, J. (2009). The new economics of sustain- able consumption. Seeds of change. New York: Palgrave.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2011). Rethinking Macroeconomics: What failed and how to repair it. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(4), 591-645.
The Foundational Economy Collective (2018). Foundational Economy. The infrastructure of every- day life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Velázquez, B., Buffaria, B. (2017). About farmers’ bargaining power within the new CAP. Agricultural and Food Economics, 16(5), 2-13.
Von Jacobi, N., Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Maestripieri, L., Giroletti, T. (2018). From asking one- self questions to taking actions - collectively: How social innovation empowers people. Un- published paper.
Von Jacobi, N., Edmiston, D., Ziegler, R. (2017). Tackling marginalisation through social innovation? Examining the EU social innovation policy agenda from a capabilities perspective. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277.
Wilkinson, J. (2015). Food security and the global agrifood system: Ethical issues in historical and sociological perspective. Global Food Security, 7(3), 9-14.
Zapf, W. (1991). The role of innovations in modernization theory. International Review of Sociology, 2(3), 83-94.
Ziegler, R. (2017). Social Innovation as a Collaborative Concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 388-405.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.
