A A multispecies journey: companion animals and family development from a life-course perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2025.252

Keywords:

family transitions, life-course perspective, companion animals, thematic analysis, animal turn

Abstract

This study provides information about the role of companion animals in the life courses of the family from a developmental approach, conceiving the bond between species as the intersection of journeys of humans and companions. Three online focus groups were conducted. A thematic analysis was performed, using an experiential and constructivist perspective. Four themes referred to moments of co-existence: 1) the arrival of the companion, 2) the joint maturation of the relationship, 3) changes related to family transitions, and 4) the end of the relationship. These themes describe how the selfhood of the companions and the identity of the family coevolves along the life-course and highlight the challenges the families face. These findings contribute to the literature that questions dominating social discourses and show emerging models of multispecies families.

Author Biographies

Javier López-Cepero-Borrego, University of Seville

Personality, Assessment & Psychological Treatment Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville.

Alicia Español, University of Seville

Experimental Psychology Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville. 

Ángel Rodríguez Banda, University of Seville

Personality, Assessment & Psychological Treatment Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville.

References

Adams, M. (2010). Losing one’s voice: Dialogical psychology and the unspeakable. Theory & Psychology, 20(3), 342-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310362825

Adams, M. (2018). Towards a critical psychology of human–animal relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12375

Adams, M. (2019). Indigenizing the Anthropocene? Specifying and situating multi-species encounters. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(3-4), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2019-0084

Aeby, G., & Gauthier, J.-A. (2021). The contribution of the life-course perspective to the study of family relationships: Advances, challenges, and limitations. In The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe (pp. 557-574). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_28

APA. (2020). APA Style JARS–Qual | Information Recommended for Inclusion in Manuscripts That Report Primary Qualitative Research. https://Apastyle.Apa.Org/Jars/Qual-Table-1.Pdf.

Baggio, G. (2023). Gesture, meaning, and intentionality: from radical to pragmatist enactive theory of language. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09936-9

Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862597

Bernardi, L., Huinink, J., & Settersten, R. A. (2019). The life course cube: A tool for studying lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004

Bouma, E. M. C., Reijgwart, M. L., & Dijkstra, A. (2022). Family member, best friend, child or ‘just’ a pet, owners’ relationship perceptions and consequences for their cats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010193

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Succesful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide to understanding and doing. SAGE.

Bryant, C. D. (1979). The Zoological Connection: Animal-Related Human Behavior. Social Forces, 58(2), 399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2577598

Bures, R. M., & Gee, N. R. (2021). Well-Being over the Life Course: Incorporating Human-Animal Interaction. In Well-Being Over the Life Course. Springer Briefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research (pp. 1-9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64085-9_1

Carlisle-Frank, P., & Frank, J. M. (2006). Owners, guardians, and owner-guardians: Differing relationships with pets. Anthrozoos, 19(3), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279306785415574

Charles, N. (2016). Post-human families? Dog-human relations in the domestic sphere. Sociological Research Online, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3975

Chur-Hansen, A. (2010). Grief and bereavement issues and the loss of a companion animal: People living with a companion animal, owners of livestock, and animal support workers. Clinical Psychologist, 14(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284201003662800

Cleary, M., West, S., Thapa, D. K., Westman, M., Vesk, K., & Kornhaber, R. (2022). Grieving the loss of a pet: A qualitative systematic review. Death Studies, 46(9), 2167-2178. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1901799

Cloutier, A., & Peetz, J. (2016). Relationships’ best friend: Links between pet ownership, empathy, and romantic relationship Outcomes. Anthrozoos, 29(3), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1181361

DiGiacomo, N., Arluke, A., & Patronek, G. (1998). Surrendering pets to shelters: The relinquisher’s perspective. Anthrozoös, 11(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.1998.11425086

Eagan, B. H., Gordon, E., & Protopopova, A. (2022). Reasons for guardian-relinquishment of dogs to shelters: Animal and regional predictors in British Columbia, Canada. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.857634

Ehmer, J. (2021). A historical perspective on family change in Europe. In N. Schneider, & M. Kreyenfeld (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00018

European Commision. (2017). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Establishing a European Pillar of Social Rights. European Commision. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0250

Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviours, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal-human divide in pet-keeping. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825679

Fox, R., & Gee, N. R. (2019). Great expectations: changing social, spatial and emotional understandings of the companion animal-human relationship. Social and Cultural Geography, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1347954

Furusten, S. (2023). Institutional theory and organizational change (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gauthier, J.-A., Aeby, G., Ramos, V., & Česnuitytè, V. (2018). Linking family trajectories and personal networks. In K. Wall, E. Widmer, J. Gauthier, V. Cesnuityte, & R. Gouveia (Eds.), Families and personal networks (pp. 187-223). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95263-2_7

Gouveia, R., & Castrén, A.-M. (2021). Redefining the Boundaries of Family and Personal Relationships. In The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe (pp. 259-277). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_13

Gray, P. B., & Young, S. M. (2011). Human-pet dynamics in cross-cultural perspective. Anthrozoos, 24(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X12923300467285

Gray, P. B., Volsche, S. L., Garcia, J. R., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). The roles of pet dogs and cats in human courtship and dating. Anthrozoos, 28(4), 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1064216

Habarth, J., Bussolari, C., Gomez, R., Carmack, B. J., Ronen, R., Field, N. P., & Packman, W. (2017). Continuing bonds and psychosocial functioning in a recently bereaved pet loss sample. Anthrozoos, 30(4), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1370242

Harris, M. (1989). Good to eat. Simon & Schuster.

Herzog, H. (2011). Some we love, some we hate, some we ate. Harper Collins.

Hintz, E. A., & Brown, C. L. (2020). Childfree and “bingoed”: A relational dialectics theory analysis of meaning creation in online narratives about voluntary childlessness. Communication Monographs, 87(2), 244-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1697891

Imber‐Black, E. (2009). Snuggles, my cotherapist, and other animal tales in life and therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 459-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01295.x

Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2021). Población residente por fecha, sexo y edad. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=31304

Irvine, L. (2004a). Rethinking the self: Mead’s myopia. In If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals (pp. 116-125). Temple University Press.

Irvine, L. (2004b). Self versus other: The core self. In If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals (pp. 127-146). Temple University Press.

Irvine, L. (2012). Sociology and Anthrozoology: Symbolic Interactionist Contributions. Anthrozoös, 25(sup1), s123-s137. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712x13353430377174

Irvine, L. (2021). Animal selfhood. In D. vom Lehn, N. Ruiz-Junco, & W. Gibson (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Interactionism (pp. 112-121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429276767

Irvine, L. (2023). Our “Zoological Connections” and Why They Matter. Sociological Forum, 38(4), 1464-1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12961

Irvine, L., & Cilia, L. (2017). More-than-human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households. Sociology Compass, 11(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12455

Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-Mcculloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022). Disenfranchised guilt—pet owners’ burden. Animals, 12(13), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131690

Laing, M., & Maylea, C. (2018). “They burn brightly, but only for a short time”: The role of social workers in companion animal grief and loss. Anthrozoos, 31(2), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1434062

Laurent-Simpson, A. (2017). Considering alternate sources of role identity: Childless parents and their animal “kids.” Sociological Forum, 32(3), 610-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12351

Law 7/2023, March 29th, for the Protection of Animals’ Rights and Welfare [de Protección de Los Derechos y Bienestar Animal] (2023). https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2023-7936

Leow, C. (2018). It’s Not Just A Dog: The Role of Companion Animals in the Family ’s Emotional System [University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/317/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Fcehsdiss%2F317&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875

López-Cepero, J., Martos-Montes, R., & Ordóñez, D. (2021). Classification of Animals as Pet, Pest, or Profit: Consistency and Associated Variables Among Spanish University Students. Anthrozoös, 34(6), 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1938408

Meil, G., Rogero-García, J., & Díaz-Gandasegui, V. (2023). Family diversity in Spain. In M. A. Adler & K. Lenz (Eds.), The Changing Faces of Families (pp. 122-141). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003193500-7

Mínguez, A. M., Gaspar, M. O., & Gamero-Burón, C. (2017). Los modelos familiares en España: Reflexionando sobre la ambivalencia familiar desde una aproximación teórica. Revista Espanola de Sociologia, 26(2), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2016.5

Power, E. (2008). Furry families: Making a human-dog family through home. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802217790

Randler, C., Adan, A., Antofie, M.-M., Arrona-Palacios, A., Candido, M., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Chandrakar, P., Demirhan, E., Detsis, V., Di Milia, L., Fančovičová, J., Gericke, N., Haldar, P., Heidari, Z., Jankowski, K. S., Lehto, J. E., Lundell-Creagh, R., Medina-Jerez, W., Meule, A., Milfont, T. L., Orgilés, M., Morales, A., Natale, V., Ortiz-Jiménez, X., Pande, B., Partonen, T., Kumar Pati, A., Prokop, P., Rahafar, A., Scheuch, M., Sahu, S., Tomažič, I., Tonetti, L., Vallejo Medina, P., van Petegem, P., Vargas, A., Vollmer, C. (2021). Animal Welfare Attitudes: Effects of Gender and Diet in University Samples from 22 Countries. Animals, 11(7), 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071893

Rennard, J., Greening, L., & Williams, J. M. (2019). In praise of dead pets: An investigation into the content and function of human-style pet Eulogies. Anthrozoos, 32(6), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1673045

Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405-426. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405

Serpell, J. A. (2010). Animal-assisted interventions in historical perspective. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (pp. 17-32). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10002-9

Shir-Vertesh, D. (2012). “Flexible personhood”: Loving animals as family members in Israel. American Anthropologist, 114(3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x

Sobotka, T., & Berghammer, C. (2021). Demography of family change in Europe. In Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00019

Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus groups: theory and practice (3rd ed.). Sage.

Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2009). Pet, pest, profit: Isolating differences in attitudes towards the treatment of animals. Anthrozoos, 22(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434158

US Census Bureau. (2022). Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2022. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2022-report-economic-well-being-us-households-202305.pdf

Veterindustria, & ANFAAC. (2021). Censos por especies en España. https://www.anfaac.org/datos-sectoriales/

Volsche, S. (2018). Negotiated bonds: The practice of childfree pet parenting. Anthrozoos, 31(3), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1455470

Walsh, F. (2009a). Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48(4), 462-480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x

Walsh, F. (2009b). Human-animal bonds II: The role of pets in family systems and family therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

López-Cepero-Borrego, J., Español, A., & Rodríguez Banda, Ángel. (2025). A A multispecies journey: companion animals and family development from a life-course perspective. Spanish Journal of Sociology, 34(1), a252. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2025.252

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.