Métricas alternativas
Metrics
Keywords
codiseño
secuencia de aprendizaje
diseño del aprendizaje
aprendizaje personalizado Flexible learning path
co-design
learning sequence
learning design
personalised learning
How to Cite
Abstract
One of the ways to incorporate learning strategies that promote flexibility, autonomy and responsibility in the context of adaptive sequencing of the curriculum to learners' differences is to design flexible learning paths. This study approaches this concept from the perspective of learning design, presenting a structure of interchangeable learning sequences that allow the configuration of personal paths by the students themselves in a process of co-design. A Likert-type questionnaire is used to analyse the general assessment of the experience, of the autonomy and control of the process, of the personal learning itineraries themselves and of the learning sequences. The results show a high score of each of the dimensions by the students. It is concluded that the configuration of the paths and the participation of the students, as well as the characteristics of the flexible learning paths to facilitate personalisation, are valuable methodological proposals.
References
Agostinho, S. (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.923
Agudelo, O. L. & Salinas J. (2015). Flexible learning itineraries based on conceptual maps. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(2), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.7.130
Agudelo, O. L. & Salinas, J. (2017). La flexibilidad y autonomía en los itinerarios de aprendizaje, una cuestión de principios, en J. Silva, EDUcación y TECnología: una mirada desde la Investigación e Innovación. (pp. 990-994). Centro de Innovación e Investigación en Educación y Tecnología (CIIET) de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
Bai, S.M. & Chen, S.M. (2008): Automatically constructing concept maps based on fuzzy rules for adapting learning systems. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal 35(1-2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.013
Bartolomé Pina, A. (2020). Cambiando el futuro: “blockchain” y Educación. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 59, 241-258. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.82546
Bartolomé, A. & Lindín, C. (2018). Posibilidades del Blockchain en Educación. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(4), 81-93. http://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181948193
Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. & Lockyer, L. (2017). The process of designing for learning: Understanding university teachers’ design work. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9469-y
Bovill, C. & Bulley, C.J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (ed.) Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. Series: Improving Student Learning (18). (pp. 176-188) Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Oxford
Brusilovsky, P. (1992): A Framework for Intelligent Knowledge Sequencing and Task Sequencing. In: Proceedings Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 499–506
Buchem, I., Tur, G. & Hoelterhof, T. (2020). The role of learner control and psychological ownership for self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning designs. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal – IxD&A, 45, 112-132. https://bit.ly/30ONHjc
Buitrago, R., Salinas, J., & Boude, O. (2020). Designing and Representing Learning Itineraries : A Systematic Review of the Literature. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, 47, 94–122. https://bit.ly/3CMIRjF
Cabero, J. (2013). El aprendizaje autorregulado como marco teórico para la aplicación educativa de las comunidades virtuales y los entornos personales de aprendizaje. Revista Teoría de la Educación, 14(2), 133-156. https://bit.ly/2We04AK
Cebreiro López, B., Fernández Morante, C. & Arribi Vilela, J. (2016). Formación profesional a distancia: corriendo en la dirección equivocada. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.04
Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillan, M., Suarez, N. & Núñez, J.C. (2014). EGraph tool: Graphing the learning process in LMSs. In: International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. (p. 273-274). Indianapolis: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567596
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0
Conole, G. & Culver, J. (2010). The design of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Computers & Education, 54(3), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.013
Conole, G. & Oliver, M. (2007). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice. Routledge. https://bit.ly/3g8frlU
de-Benito, B., Darder, A. & Salinas, J. (2012). Los itinerarios de aprendizaje mediante mapas conceptuales como recursos para la representación del conocimiento. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 39, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2012.39.372
de-Benito, B., Moreno-García, J. & Villatoro Moral, S. (2020a). Entornos tecnológicos en el codiseño de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje en la enseñanza superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 74, 72-93. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1843
de-Benito, B., Villatoro, S., & Salinas, J. (2020b). Propuesta de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje en la formación inicial docente. En C. Lindín, M. B. Esteban, J. C. . Bergman, N. Castells, & P. Rivera-Vargas (Eds.), Llibre d’actes de la I Conferència Internacional de Recerca en educació. Educació 2019: reptes, tendències i compromisos (pp. 567-575). LiberLibro. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/41685
Díaz-Barriga, A. (1997). Didáctica y currículum. Convergencias en los programas de estudio. Paidós.
Escobar-Pérez, J. & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez De Contenido Y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27-36.
Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2(2), 27–50 https://doi.org/10.1111/hea.12037_26.
Goodyear. P., Carvalho. L., Yeoman. P., Castañeda, L. & Adell, J. (2021). Una herramienta tangible para facilitar procesos de diseño y análisis didáctico: Traducción y adaptación transcultural del Toolkit ACAD. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 60, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.84457
Gros, B. & Noguera, I. (2013). Mirando el futuro: Evolución de las tendencias tecnopedagógicas en Educación Superior. Campus Virtuales, 2(2), 130-140. https://bit.ly/2LdNtH7
Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacón, J., Prieto, L. P. & Persico, D. (2014). An Integrated Environment for Learning Design. Frontier in ICT, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009
Jääskelä, P., Heilala, V., Kärkkäinen, T. & Häkkinen, P. (2020). Student agency analytics: learning analytics as a tool for analysing student agency in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 46(4), 790-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1725130
Kardan, A.A., Ebrahim, M.A. & Imani, M.B. (2014). A new personalized learning path generation method: Acomap. Indian J Sci Res, 5(1):17
Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309–322.
Lau, R.Y., Chung, A.Y., Song, D.W. & Huang, Q. (2008): Towards Fuzzy Domain Ontology Based Concept Map Generation for E-Learning. In: Leung, H., Li, F., Lau, R., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4823, pp. 90–101. Springer.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge. https://bit.ly/2yjHqOy
Laurillard, D., Charlton, B., Craft, B. Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G., Masterman, E., Puajadas, R., Whitley, E.A. & Whittlestone, K. (2013): A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x
Llorente, M.C. (2013). Aprendizaje autorregulado y PLE. Edmetic, 2(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v2i1.2861
Marín-Juarros, V., Negre-Bennasar, F. & Pérez-Garcias, A. (2014). Construction of the foundations of the PLE and PLN for collaborative learning. [Entornos y redes personales de aprendizaje (PLE-PLN) para el aprendizaje colaborativo]. Comunicar, 42, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-03
Martí, C, de-Benito, B, Ordinas, C, & Salinas, J. (1999). Itinerarios de aprendizaje en el proyecto Campus Extens. Elaboración de material didáctico multimedia. EDUTEC '99: Nuevas Tecnologías en la formació flexible y a distancia. Sevilla
McAndrew, P. & Goodyear, P. (2013). Representing practitioner experiences through learning designs and patterns. In H.Beetham & R.Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 133–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078952-20
Muhammad A., Zhou Q., Beydoun G., Xu D., & Shen J (2016). Learning path adaptation in online learning systems. IEEE 20th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD). IEEE, pp 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1109/cscwd.2016.7566026
Premlatha K. & Geetha T (2015). Learning content design and learner adaptation for adaptive e-learning environment: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(4), 443–465 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9432-z
Prendes, M.P., Solano, I.M., Serrano, J.L., González-Calatayud, V., & Román, M.M. (2018). Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje para la comprensión y desarrollo de la competencia digital: Análisis de los estudiantes universitarios en España. Educatio Siglo XXI, 3(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.6018/j/333081
Richey, R. & Klein, J. (2014). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
Salinas, J. (2013). Enseñanza Flexible y Aprendizaje Abierto, Fundamentos clave de los PLEs. En L. Castañeda & J. Adell (Eds.) Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red (pp. 53–70). Marfil.
Salinas, J. & de-Benito, B. (2020). Construcción de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje mediante métodos mixtos. Comunicar, 65, 31-42 https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-03
Santana, J. S. & Pérez, A. (2020). Codiseño educativo haciendo uso de las TIC en educación superior una revisión sistemática de literatura. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 74, 25-50. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1799
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development. Theory and Practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Tennyson, R. D. & Breuer, K. (2010). Psychological foundations for instructional design theory. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. M. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design: international perspectives, Theory, research and models, Vol. 1 (pp. 113–134). Routledge.
Tobón, S., Pimienta, J. H. & García, J. A. (2010). Didácticas: Aprendizaje y evaluación de competencias. Pearson-Prentice Hall. https://bit.ly/2LHK5Vk
Villatoro Moral, S. & de Benito, B. (2021). An Approach to Co-Design and Self-Regulated Learning in Technological Environments. Systematic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 234-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
Yang, F., Li1, F., & Lau, R. (2010). An Open Model for Learning Path Construction. En Luo, X. et al. (Eds.): ICWL 2010, LNCS 6483 (pp. 318–328). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_33
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Pixel-Bit. Media and Education Journal