A social pedagogical intervention to support children in care: Back on Track
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2022.41.02Keywords:
children in care, resilience, intervention, school exclusion, social pedagogyAbstract
This paper focuses on an intervention project, Back on Track (BoT), implemented as a part of the Resilience Revolution: HeadStart Blackpool (RR:HS) programme in the UK. Whilst it is a famous family holiday resort, Blackpool is also one of the most deprived towns in England. This makes life challenging for young people (YP) to maintain wellbeing and reach their potential. Blackpool also has an above average and growing proportion of children in care. They are at a higher risk of developing mental health difficulties and of being permanently excluded from school. BoT aimed to support fostered children who have been referred by schools or social workers to the project for having emotional and behavioural struggles. As a consequence of their difficulties, they were at risk of permanent exclusion from the school. The intervention was grounded in a social pedagogical approach and Resilient Therapy. Resilience Coaches (i.e., wellbeing practitioners) had the role of enhancing communication between YP, family, social care, and school, whilst working with YP to co-produce coping strategies. Between November 2016 and June 2021, 39 YP (61.5% male) aged 10 to 15 (M = 12.74, SD = 1.60) received BoT support over a period lasting between 4 months to 2.5 years (M = 14 months, SD = 6.8 months). Using a mixed-methods design, this paper explored the BoT implementation. YP completed questionnaires before and after BoT. Triangulation interviews were conducted with a randomly selected YP, foster parent and the Resilience Coach. Results showed the benefit of equipping YP with ‘resilient moves’ and joining up systems to work together and better support YP and families. YP reported reduced difficulties, improved strengths (i.e., prosocial behaviour) and educational outcomes. This helped build resilience and reduce the risk of permanent exclusions from school. Policy and practice implications for children in care are discussed.
Downloads
References
Banks, S., Hart, A., Pahl, K., & Ward, P. (2018). Co-producing research: A community development approach. Policy Press.
Boingboing. (2021). Interactive Resilience Framework. https://www.boingboing.org.uk/interactive-resilience-framework
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Department for Education. (2019a). Children looked after in England (including adoption) year ending 31 March 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoption-2018-to-2019
Department for Education. (2019b). Special educational needs in England: January 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/special-educational-needs-in-england-january-2019
Department for Education. (2020a). Outcomes for children looked after by LAs: 31 March 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/outcomes-for-children-looked-after-by-local-authorities-31-march-2019
Department for Education. (2020b). Participation in education, training and employment: 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/participation-in-education-training-and-employment-2019
Department for Education. (2020c). Pupil absence in schools in England: 2018 to 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/pupil-absence-in-schools-in-england-2018-to-2019
Department for Education. (2020d). Permanent and fixed-period exclusions in England: 2018 to 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-in-england-2018-to-2019
Edbrooke-Childs, J., Jacob, J., Law, D., Deighton, J., & Wolpert, M. (2015). Interpreting standardized and idiographic outcome measures in CAMHS: What does change mean and how does it relate to functioning and experience? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12107
Eichsteller, G., & Holthoff, S. (2011). Conceptual foundations of social pedagogy: A transnational perspective from Germany. In C. Cameron, & P. Moss (Eds.), Social pedagogy and working with children and young people: Where care and education meet (pp. 33-52). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
Hart, A., & Aumann, K. (2017) Briefing paper: Building child and family resilience – Boingboing’s resilience approach in action. Totnes: Research in Practice. https://www.boingboing.org.uk/boingboings-resilience-approach-in-action/
Hart, A., Blincow, D., & Thomas, H. (2007). Resilient Therapy: Working with children and families. East Sussex: Routledge.
Hart, A., & Williams, L. (2014). The Academic Resilience Approach. Boingboing. https://www.boingboing.org.uk/resilience/the-academic-resilience-approach/
HeadStart Blackpool. (2020). HeadStart Blackpool annual report 2019-2020. Blackpool Council. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X6GhZmPl23ICux12unuGa4Nu12TCVw1S/view
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Kara, B., Morris, R., Brown, A., Wigglesworth, P., Kania, J., Hart, A., … & Eryigit-Madzwamuse, S. (2021). Bounce Forward: A school-based prevention programme for building resilience in a socioeconomically disadvantaged context. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 599669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599669
Law, D., & Jacob, J. (2015). Goals and Goal Based Outcomes (GBOs): Some useful information (3rd Ed). CAMHS Press.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. (2019). English Indices of Deprivation 2019: Research report. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/833947/IoD2019_Research_Report.pdf
National Lottery Community Fund. (2021). HeadStart. https://www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/funding/strategic-investments/headstart#section-1
Petrie, P., Boddy, J., & Cameron, C. (2006). Working with Children in Care: European Perspectives: European Perspectives. Open University Press.
Public Health England. (2021). Public Health Outcomes Framework. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework/data#page/1/gid/1000049/pat/6/par/E12000002/ati/402/are/E06000009/cid/4/tbm/1
Rahilly, T., & Hendry, E. (eds.). (2014). Promoting the wellbeing of children in care: messages from research. NSPCC. http://library.nspcc.org.uk/HeritageScripts/Hapi.dll/search2?searchTerm0=C5275
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
Rubin, D. M., O’Reilly, A. L. R., Luan, X., & Localio, A. R. (2007). The impact of placement stability on behavioral well-being for children in foster care. Pediatrics, 119, 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1995
Simkiss, D. (2012). Outcomes for looked after children and young people. Paediatrics and Child Health, 22, 388-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2012.05.004
Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47, 546-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.958965
Viner, R. M., & Taylor, B. (2005). Adult health and social outcomes of children who have been in public care: population-based study. Pediatrics, 115(4), 894-899. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1311
West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, R. (2010). Transition matters: Pupils' experiences of the primary-secondary school transition in the West of Scotland and consequences for well-being and attainment. Research Papers in Education, 25, 21-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802308677
Youth in Mind. (2016). Scoring the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for age 4-17 or 18+. https://sdqinfo.org/py/sdqinfo/b3.py?language=Englishqz(UK)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and right to archive
The published version of the articles can be self-archived by their authors in open access institutional and thematic repositories. However, Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria must authorize partial or global reutilisation on new papers or publications.
Published papers must be cited including the title of the journal Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, issue, pages and year of publication
Ethical responsibilities
Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria does not accept any material that has been previously published in other documents or publications. Authors are responsible for obtaining the required permissions for partial or global reproduction any material from other publications, and to correctly quote its origin.
Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria is obliged to detect and report fraudulent practices.
Only those who have intellectually contribute to the development of the paper must appear as authors.
The journal expects authors to declare any commercial partnership that might entail a conflict of interest with respect to the submitted article.
Authors must mention in the article, preferably in the “methodology” section, that the procedures used during the samplings and controls have been made after getting informed consent.
The journal will not use any received contribution in a way other than the goals described in these guidelines.
Copyright Notice
© Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria. Papers published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are property of Pedagogia Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, being required to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise stated, all content of this electronic journal is distributed under "Creative Commons Attribution-Non commercial 3.0 Spain" (CC-by-nc) license for use and distribution. The informative version and the legal text of this license is available here. This has to be expressly stated in this way when necessary.