Liberalismo armónico. La teoría política del primer krausismo español (1860-1868).
Keywords:
Liberalism, Spain, Krause, XIXth century.Abstract
What became known as Spanish Krausism was not just a philosophical school but also a well-defined political doctrine. Some years before the Krausist authors became leading lights in public life during the Restoration, they laid down the foundations of their future political ideas. As of 1860, Francisco de Paula Canalejas attempted to construct a new political science based on Krause’s philosophy and on Ahrens’ public law. First, via the La Razon journal and later through the pages of the Revista Ibérica, Canalejas expounded a new liberal credo informed by the ideas of reason, science, freedom and law. Harmonic liberalism rejected both the old Spanish moderate and progressive political parties and emerging political forces such as socialism. It tried to forge its own space within the spectrum of democratic groups. It proposed a kind of politics that would apply reforms and allow free association of individuals, seeing this as the best way to achieve progress in society. As a result of previous activity, when the 1868 revolution broke out in Spain, the group had already established a sound political theory that would exercise significant influence over the coming decades.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



