Lip eczema. Experience in the Contact Dermatitis Unit of a Spanish tertiary hospital

Authors

  • L. Loidi-Pascual
  • M. Hervella-Garcés
  • M. Larrea-García
  • R. Santesteban-Muruzábal
  • A. Agulló-Pérez
  • I. Yanguas-Bayona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0280

Keywords:

Cheilitis. Allergic contact dermatitis. Eczema. Patch tests. Cosmetics.

Abstract

            Background. Lip eczema is an infrequent problem in Contact Dermatitis Units (CDU). Very few series have been published to date that show the profiles of such patients and the causes of their eczemas, and none are Spanish. The goal of this study was to analyze the epidemiological profile of the patients who attend a CDU in our setting, the main diagnoses and the relevant allergens.

            Methods. A retrospective review was made of the patients referred to the CDU in the 2005-2014 period. Patch tests were carried out with the extended standard series of the Spanish Research Group on Allergic Contact Dermatitis (Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis Alérgica de contacto – GEIDAC), our own products and other complementary sets.

            Results. The most frequent diagnoses in the 78 patients studied were allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis. The most frequent relevant allergens were cosmetics and topical medications.

            Conclusions. It is essential to study the patients with lip eczema with patch tests to be able to correctly determine their etiology and accordingly to carry out the most suitable treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. LIM JTE, NG SK, GOH CL. Contact cheilitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27: 263-264.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb03264.x

2. FREEMAN S, STEPHENS R. CHEILITIS: analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic. Am J Contact Dermat 1999; 10: 198-200.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-199912000-00003

3. KANTHRAJ GR, SHENOI SD, SRINIVAS CR. Patch testing in contact cheilitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 40: 285.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06070.x

4. LIM SH, GOH CL. Epidemiology of eczematous cheilitis at a tertiary dermatological referral centre in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43: 322-326.

https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043006322.x

5. STRAUSS RM, ORTON DI. Allergic contact cheilitis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective study. Am J Contact Dermat 2003; 14: 75-77.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01634989-200306000-00005

6. ZOLI V, SILVANI S, VINCENZI C, TOSTI A. Allergic contact cheilitis. Contact dermatitis. 2006; 54: 296-297.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.0698b.x

7. SCHENA D, FANTUZZI F, GIROMOLONI G. Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2008; 18: 688-692.

8. ZUG KA, KORNIK R, BELSITO DV, DELEO VA, FOWLER JR. JF, MAIBACH HI et al. Patch- testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004. Dermatitis 2008; 19: 202-208.

https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2008.07046

9. KATSAROU A, ARMENAKA M, VOSYNIOTI V, LAGOGIANNI E, STAVROPOULOS PG, KALOGEROMITROS D. Allergic contact dermatitis in Athens. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59: 123-125.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01342.x

10. HERVELLA M, FERNÁNDEZ-REDONDO V. La dermatitis de contacto en el siglo XXI. La apuesta del Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutánea (GEIDAC). Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012;103: 345-347

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2011.12.004

11. EICHENFIELD LF, HANIFIN JM, LUGER TA, STEVENS SR, PRIDE HB. Consensus conference on pediatric atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 1088-1095.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(03)02539-8

12. MUÑOZ D, AUDICANA M, GASTAMINZA G, FERNÁNDEZ E. Dermatitis de contacto por galatos. Alergol Inmunol Clin 2002; 17: 173-177.

13. SCHNUCH A, GEIER J, UTER W, FROSCH PJ. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 467-476.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02126.x

14. HAUSEN BM, BEYER W. The sensitiziting capacity of the antioxidants propyl, octyl, and dodecyl gallate and some related gallic acid esters. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 253-258.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00238.x

15. GARCÍA-MELGARES ML, DE LA CUADRA J, MARTIN B, LAGUNA C, MARTINEZ L, ALEGRE V. Sensibilización por galatos. Revisión de 46 casos. Actas dermosifiliogr 2007; 98: 688-693.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-7310(07)70161-8

16. JACK AR, NORRIS PL, STORRS FJ. Allergic contact dermatitis to plant extracts in cosmetics. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2013; 32: 140-146.

https://doi.org/10.12788/j.sder.0019

17. HOLDINESS MR. Contact dermatitis from topical antiviral drugs. Contact dermatitis 2001; 44: 265-269.

https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440501.x

18. VERNASSIERE C, BARBAUD A, TRECHOT PH, WEBER-MULLER F, SCHMUTZ JL. Systemic acyclovir reaction subsequent to acyclovir contact allergy: which systemic antiviral drug should then be used? Contact Dermatitis 2003; 49: 155-157.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00199.x

19. SCHEMAN A, JACOB S, KATTA R, NEDOROST S, WARSHAW E, ZIRWAS M et al. Lip and common dental care products: trends and alternatives. Data from the American contact alternatives group. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011; 4: 50-53.

Published

2015-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Loidi-Pascual L, Hervella-Garcés M, Larrea-García M, Santesteban-Muruzábal R, Agulló-Pérez A, Yanguas-Bayona I. Lip eczema. Experience in the Contact Dermatitis Unit of a Spanish tertiary hospital. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 19];38(3):409-16. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/32397

Issue

Section

Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.