Bilateral subgaleal hematoma after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an uncommon complication

Authors

  • Iñigo Rubio Baines Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Clinica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-1910
  • Antonio Martínez Simón Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Clinica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España.
  • Francisco Javier Ancizu Urology. Clinica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España
  • Isidro Olavide Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Clinica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España.
  • Cristina Honorato-Cía Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Clinica Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona. España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1047

Keywords:

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Subgaleal hematoma, Steep Trendelenburg

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a relatively recent technique. Its advantages include less invasiveness, better pain management, and reduced length of hospital stay1. The surgical time, once the learning curve is over, is about two hours.

Some of the requirements when using this technique can be challenging for the anesthesiologist. The patient must be positioned in steep Trendelenburg (> 30º), a pneumoperitoneum established, and a deep muscular blockade is desirable. This potentially helps impair homeostasis, ventilation, and cervical and cephalic venous-lymphatic drainage. The presence of increased intraocular or intracranial pressures is a contraindication for performing this technique.

Common risks of the steep Trendelenburg position, which increase with time, include intraoperative hypotension, and soft-tissue edema (tongue, eyelids, conjunctiva, and scalp); severe complications are rare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

NIKLAS C, SAAR M, BERG B, STEINER K, JANSSEN M, SIEMER S et al. da Vinci and open radical prostatectomy: comparison of clinical outcomes and analysis of insurance costs. Urol Int 2016; 96(3): 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431104

ACETO P, BERETTA L, CARIELLO C, CLARONI C, ESPOSITO C, FORASTIERE EM et al. Joint consensus on anesthesia in urologic and gynecologic robotic surgery: specific issues in management from a task force of the SIAARTI, SIGO, and SIU. Minerva Anestesiol 2019; 85(8): 871-885. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13360-3

MONDZELEWSKI TJ, SCHMITZ JW, CHRISTMAN MS, DAVIS KD, LUJAN E, L’ESPERANCE JO et al. Intraocular pressure during robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures utilizing steep Trendelenburg positioning. J Glaucoma 2015; 24(6): 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000302

IQBAL H, GRAY M, GOWRIE-MOHAN S. Anaesthesia for robot-assisted urological surgery. Anaesthesia tutorial of the week 408. World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists, 2019. https://resources.wfsahq.org/wp-content/uploads/408_english.pdf

CHEN K, WANG L, WANG Q, LIU X, LU Y, LI Y et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position on cerebral hemodynamics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled study. Medicine 2019; 98(21): e15794. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000015794

COLOMINA MJ, GODET C, PELLISÉ F, BAGÓ J, VILLANUEVA C. Transcranial doppler monitoring during laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Anesth Analg 2003; 97 (6): 1675-1679. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000087880.88858.72

BARR C, MADHURI TK, PRABHU P, BUTLER-MANUEL S, TAILOR A. Cerebral oedema following robotic surgery: a rare complication. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290(5): 1041-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3355-9

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Rubio Baines, I., Martínez Simón, A., Ancizu, F. J., Olavide, I., & Honorato-Cía, C. (2023). Bilateral subgaleal hematoma after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an uncommon complication . Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra, 46(2), e1047. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1047

Issue

Section

Clinical notes