Treatment of recalcitrant humeral nonunion in elderly patients

Authors

  • A. J. Garbayo Marturet Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
  • A. Tejero Ibáñez Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
  • F. J. Repáraz Pádros Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
  • A. Castaño Serrano Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0343

Keywords:

Humerus. Recalcitrant nonunion. Elderly.

Abstract

Background. Humeral nonunion that persists through various unsuccessful attempts at management, presents a real challenge. When combined with severe osteoporosis in elderly patients, the problems only increase. This study aims to investigate the best option for treating this combination of factors.

Materials and method. This study analyses the outcomes of five patients with the following inclusion criteria: nonunion of the humeral diaphysis, after at least two unsuccessful interventions and/or after a period of 18 months or more, associated with severe osteoporosis in patients aged over 65. All cases were treated by debridement of the site of nonunion and stabilisation with locking plates and bone graft.

Results. All cases consolidated after a mean follow-up period of 19 months (8-36 months). 

Conclusions. In cases of humeral nonunion in elderly patients with osteoporotic bones, locking plates have been proven to provide consistent, long-term stability, with better results than traditional compression plates. The authors consider that locking plates should be considered as a valid option in cases of extreme bone and biological instability, as is the case in recalcitrant humeral nonunion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. WALKER M, PALUMBO B, BADMAN B, BROOKS J, VAN GELDEREN J, MIGHELL M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030

2. KONTAKIS G, TOSOUNIDIS T, PASKALOS J. Humeral diaphyseal aseptic non-unions: An algorithm of management. Injury 2007; 385: 539-549.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(07)80008-8

3. PARIS H, TROPIANO P, CLOUET B, CHAUDET H, POITUOUT D. Fractures diaphysaires de l'humérus: ostéosyntèse systématique par plaque. Résultats d'une série de 156 cas et revue de la littérature. Rev Chir Orthop 2000; 86: 346-359.

4. CONSTANT CR, MURLEY AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987; 214: 160-164.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023

5. MARTI RK, VERHEYEN CC, BESSELAAR PP. Humeral shaft nonunion: evaluation of uniform surgical repair in fifty-one patients. Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 108-115.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200202000-00007

6. RING D, PEREY BH, JUPITER JB. The functional outcome of operative treatment of ununited fractures of the humeral diaphysis in older patients. J Bone Jt Surg 1999; 81A: 177-189.

https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199902000-00005

7. CANTU RV, KOVAL KJ. Las placas bloqueadas en el tratamiento de las fracturas. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (Ed Esp) 2006; 5: 137-144.

8. O'TOOLE RV, ANDERSEN RC, VESNOVSKY O, ALEXANDER M, TOPOLESKI LD, NASCONE JV et al. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 709-715.

https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb

9. GARDNER MJ, GRIFFITH MH, DEMETRAKOPOULOS D, BROPHY RH, GROSE A, HELFET DL et al. Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg 2006; 88A: 1962-1967.

https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200609000-00009

10. RING D, KLOEN P, KADZIELSKI J, HELFET D, JUPITER JB. Locking compression plates for osteoporotic nonunions of the diaphyseal humerus. Clin Orthop 2004; 425: 50-54.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000131484.27501.4b

11. GARDNER MJ, HELFET DL, LORICH DG. Has locked plating completely replaced conventional plating?. Am J Orthop 2004; 33: 439-446.

12. HAIDUKEWYCH GJ, RICCI W. Las placas bloqueadas en traumatología: actualización clínica. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (Ed Esp) 2008; 7: 371-379.

13. BORUS TD, YIAN EH, KARUNAKAR MA. A case series and review of salvage surgery for refractory humeral shaft non-union following two or more prior surgical procedures. Iowa Orthop J 2005; 25: 194-199.

14. HORNICEK FJ, ZYCH GA, HUTSON JJ, MALININ TI. Salvage of humeral nonunion with onlay bone plate allograft augmentation. Clin Orthop 2001; 386: 203-209.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200105000-00026

15. PATEL VR, MENON DK, POOL RD, SIMONIS RB. Nonunion of the humerus after failure of surgical management. J Bone Jt Surg 2000; 82B: 977-983.

https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.0820977

16. MURAMATSU K, DOI K, IHARA K, MITSUNORI S, KAWAI S. Recalcitrant posttraumatic non-union of the humerus. 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 95-97.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013734

17. PIÑAL F, GARCÍA-BERNAL FJ, DELGADO J, SANMARTÍN M, REGALADO J, CAGIGAL L et al. Colgajo microvascular corticoperióstico de cóndilo femoral para las pseudoartrosis diafisarias recalcitrantes de extremidad superior. Rev Ortop Traumatol 2007; 51: 62-68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0482-5985(07)74569-8

Published

2014-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Garbayo Marturet AJ, Tejero Ibáñez A, Repáraz Pádros FJ, Castaño Serrano A. Treatment of recalcitrant humeral nonunion in elderly patients. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2014 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Mar. 14];37(2):257-64. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/29441

Issue

Section

Short articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.